Diversity of oviposition containers and buildings where Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti can be found

Authors

  • Vanderlei C da Silva Instituto Oswaldo Cruz; Departamento de Entomologia
  • Paulo O Scherer Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro; Instituto de Biologia
  • Simone S Falcão Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro; Instituto de Biologia
  • Jeronimo Alencar Instituto Oswaldo Cruz; Departamento de Entomologia
  • Sergio P Cunha Secretaria de Estado da Saúde do Rio de Janeiro; Centro de Estudos e Pesquisa em Antropozoonoses Máximo da Fonseca Filho
  • Iram M Rodrigues Secretaria Municipal de Saúde do Rio de Janeiro
  • Nadja L Pinheiro Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro; Instituto de Biologia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102006000700021

Keywords:

Aedes aegypti, Aedes albopictus, Larva^i2^sgrowth & developm, Spatial distribution of population, Insect vectors

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the diversity of oviposition containers and buildings where females of Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti can be found. METHODS: A study was carried out in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Southern Brazil, between 2002 and 2003. Larvae in different types of buildings were investigated, and immature forms found were then sent to the laboratory for identification. The larval frequency for both mosquitoes was estimated in the oviposition containers available. The Breteau index and the building infestation index were calculated and differences were tested using the Chi-square test. RESULTS: The types of buildings that were positive for Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti were: dwellings (83.9%); churches, schools, clubs (6.8%); vacant land (6.4%); and businesses (2.8%). Of 9,153 larvae collected, 12.0% were Aedes albopictus and 88.0% were Aedes aegypti. Aedes albopictus were mostly found in drains (25.4%); cans, bottles, empty bottles (23.9%); and plant vases (16.2%). Aedes aegypti was much more frequently found than Aedes albopictus (chi2=145.067; p<0.001). Both species were significantly more frequent in artificial than in natural oviposition containers (chi2=31.46; p<0.001). The building infestation index and Breteau index for Aedes albopictus were 0.3% and 0.28% in 2002 and 0.4% and 0.5 in 2003, respectively. For Aedes aegypti, they were 1.0%, 1.16 in 2002 and 3.5% and 4.35 in 2003, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The present study assessed the frequencies of Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti females in various types of oviposition containers and types of buildings. The abundant availability of artificial containers in dwellings, associated with the capacity of Ae. albopictus to be also found in natural oviposition containers, has greatly contributed for their gradual adaptation to human environment.

Published

2006-12-01

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Silva, V. C. da, Scherer, P. O., Falcão, S. S., Alencar, J., Cunha, S. P., Rodrigues, I. M., & Pinheiro, N. L. (2006). Diversity of oviposition containers and buildings where Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti can be found . Revista De Saúde Pública, 40(6), 1106-1111. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102006000700021