Conceptions of physiotherapists and occupational therapists regarding theuse of motorized mobility by people with cerebral palsy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2238-6149.v36e240646Keywords:
Assistive technology, Cerebral palsy, Occupational therapy, Physiotherapy, WheelchairAbstract
Introduction: Cerebral Palsy can affect movement and interaction with the environment. Motorized mobility is a resource that promotes participation in activities, and its prescription is assigned to physical therapists and occupational therapists. Objectives: To analyze these professionals' perceptions of the use of motorized mobility by people with cerebral palsy. Methodological procedures: This was a descriptive, qualitative, and cross-sectional study with physical therapists and occupational therapists from a Specialized Rehabilitation Center at a public university in the Northeast region of Brazil. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and subjected to thematic content analysis. Results: Sixteen professionals were interviewed. The analysis resulted in two categories: the first related to experience in prescribing motorized mobility, in which most reported a lack of practice, associated with insecurity and lack of technical mastery; the second explored the benefits and difficulties perceived in prescribing and using these devices. Among the positive aspects, gains in independence, autonomy, and cognition were cited. Barriers identified were high cost and inadequate infrastructure. Conclusions: The need to expand knowledge and professional training on motorized mobility was identified, aiming to promote access for people with cerebral palsy to resources that promote autonomy, social participation, and quality of life.
Downloads
References
1. American Occupational Therapy Association. Occupational therapy practice framework: domain and process. 4th ed. Am J Occup Ther. 2020;74(Suppl 2):7412410010. doi:10.5014/ajot.2020.74S2001
2. World Health Organization. WHO guidelines on the provision of manual wheelchairs in less resourced settings. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2023. Disponível em: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/guidelines-on-the-provision-of-manual-wheelchairs-in-less-resourced-settings
3. Camargos ACR, Lacerda TTB, Barros TV, Silva GC, Parreiras JT, Vidal THJ. Relação entre independência funcional e qualidade de vida na paralisia cerebral. Fisio Mov. 2012;25(1): 83-92. doi:10.1590/S0103-51502012000100009
4. Pereira HV. Paralisia cerebral. Resid Pediatr. 2018;8(Supl 1):49-55. doi:10.25060/residpediatr-2018.v8s1-09
5. Miller G, Clark GD. Paralisias cerebrais: causas, consequências e condutas. São Paulo: Manole; 2002.
6. Palisano R, Rosenbaum P, Bartlett D, Livingston M. GMFCS – E & R gross motor function classification system expanded and revised. [Hamilton]: McMaster University; 2007. Disponível em: https://canchild.ca/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/GMFCS-ER_Translation-Portuguese2.pdf?license=yes
7. Silva EA. Uso da cadeira de rodas motorizada com comando nos pés: relato de experiência de uma jovem com paralisia cerebral [trabalho de conclusão de curso]. Goiânia: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás; 2023. Disponível em: https://repositorio.pucgoias.edu.br/jspui/handle/123456789/Ac591
8. Galvão CRC, Barroso BIL, Grutt DC. A tecnologia assistiva e os cuidados específicos na concessão de cadeiras de rodas no Estado do Rio Grande do Norte. Cad. Bras. Ter. Ocup. 2013;21(1):11-18. doi:10.4322/cto.2013.003
9. Ministério da Saúde (BR), Secretaria de Atenção Especializada à Saúde, Departamento de Atenção Especializada e Temática. Guia para prescrição, concessão, adaptação e manutenção de órteses, próteses e meios auxiliares de locomoção. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2019.
10. Rosen L, Arva J, Furumasu J, Harris M, Lange ML, McCarthy E et al. RESNA position on the application of power wheelchairs for pediatric users. Assist Technol. 2009;21(4):218-25. doi:10.1080/10400430903246076.PubMed PMID: 20066888.
11. Ministério da Saúde (BR), Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Portaria nº 661, de 2 de dezembro de 2010: Atualiza os atributos dos procedimentos da Tabela de Procedimentos, Medicamentos e OPM do SUS [Internet]. Diário Oficial da União. 2010. Disponível em: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/sas/Links%20finalizados%20SAS%202010/prt0661_02_12_2010.html
12. Bardin L. Análise de conteúdo. São Paulo: Edições 70; 2011.
13. Manship S, Hatzidimitriadou E, Moore J, Stein M, Towse D, Smith R. The experiences and perceptions of health-care professionals regarding assistive technology training: A systematic review. Assist Technol. 2024;36(2):123-146. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2023.2219294
14. Gonçalves VM, Moram CBM, Marinho FS. Terapia ocupacional e prescrição de cadeira de rodas: proposta de fluxograma de prescrições com base na revisão narrativa. Rev Interinst Bras Ter Ocup. 2022;6(2):1008-26. doi:10.47222/2526-3544.rbto43657
15. Ministério da Saúde (BR). Portaria nº 1.272, de 25 de junho de 2013 [Internet]. Diário Oficial da União; 2013 jun 26:Seção 1:63. Disponível em: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/gm/2013/prt1272_25_06_2013.html
16. Ministério da Saúde (BR), Comissão Nacional de Incorporação de Tecnologias no SUS (CONITEC). Relatório nº 50: procedimento cadeira de rodas motorizada na tabela de órteses, próteses e materiais especiais não relacionados ao ato cirúrgico do SUS. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2013.
17. Logan SW, Sloane BM, Kenyon LK, Feldner HA. Powered Mobility Device Use and Developmental Change of Young Children with Cerebral Palsy. Behav Sci (Basel). 2023;13(5):399. doi:10.3390/bs13050399
18. Pontes FV. Adequação postural em cadeiras de rodas de pessoas com deficiência: estudo retrospectivo [dissertação]. São Paulo: Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo; 2017. doi:10.11606/D.5.2017.tde-18122017-100521
19. Cunha R. Diagnóstico situacional das oficinas ortopédicas habilitadas pelo Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) no estado do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto Federal do Rio de Janeiro; 2020. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ifrj.edu.br/xmlui/handle/20.500.12083/927
20. Livingstone R, Paleg G. Practice considerations for the introduction and use of power mobility for children. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2014;56(3):210-21. doi:10.1111/dmcn.12245
21. Frank AO, De Souza LH. Problematic clinical features of children and adults with cerebral palsy who use electric powered indoor/outdoor wheelchairs: a cross-sectional study. Assist Technol. 2017;29(2):68-75. doi:10.1080/10400435.2016.1201873
22. Vassbo AM, Mork G. Children’s opportunities and rights for mobility and participation: occupational therapists’ experiences with paediatric powered mobility. Scand J Occup Ther. 2025;32(1):1-12. doi:10.1080/11038128.2025.2520863
