Signos, comunicação e mundo da vida: a abordagem sócio-fenomenológica da semiótica de Alfred Schütz
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2316-7114.sig.2004.65595Keywords:
Sign theory, Representation, Apresentation, Sociophenomenology, Communication and intersubjectivityAbstract
By analyzing the relation between individual and society, Alfred Schütz in his socio-phenomenological approach perceived the importance of medíating communication and sign processes, and consequently developed a semiotic theory. Representation, understood as essential for his sign concept, is seen here as a re1ation between signifier and signified which is installed by the user in a constructive act of interpretation. The subsequently developed concept of"appresentation" comprises the objective meaníng at the levei ofa) a sign system; b) subjective interpretation; c) situation or context; and, taking into account the communicative function o f the sign process, d) a sign producer and its complement, e) a sign recipient.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2004-12-23
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2004 Michael Hanke
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal must agree with the following terms:
- Authors keep their copyrights and grant the journal first time publication rights, having their articles simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows sharing texts with authorship recognition and first publication on this journal for non-commercial purposes.
- Authors are allowed to make additional contracts, for a non-exclusive distribution of the article’s version published on this journal (e.g.: publishing in institutional repositories of articles or as a book chapter), with authorship recognition and first publication on this journal.
How to Cite
Signos, comunicação e mundo da vida: a abordagem sócio-fenomenológica da semiótica de Alfred Schütz. (2004). Significação: Journal of Audiovisual Culture, 31(22), 79-97. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2316-7114.sig.2004.65595