The Cartesian metaphysics of the causes of motion: mechanism and divine agency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-31662003000300003Keywords:
Mechanical philosophy, Descartes, Motion, Force, Cause, Divine agency, Physics and metaphysicsAbstract
The mechanist program presented by Descartes in the Principles of the Philosophy is intended to provide explanations of the causal mechanisms of the physical world exclusively in terms of the geometrical properties of matter and motion. Thus understood, matter cannot contain in itself the sources of its own activity, mobility, or diversity, which means that forces or any other active principles do not play any role in the Cartesian mechanist ontology. This paper attempts to clarify Descartes' claim that divine agency can replace in his mechanical universe the banished forces.Downloads
References
BARRA, E. S. O. Omnis philosophiae difficultas: o conceito de força na filosofia natural de Newton. Dissertação de mestrado. São Paulo, FFLCH/USP, 1994.
BLACKWELL, R. J. “Descartes’ laws of motion.” Isis, 57, 2, 1966, p. 220-34.
BOYLAN, M. “Henry More’s space and the spirit of nature.” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 18, 4,
, p. 395-405.
DESCARTES, R. “Principia philosophiae”. In: ADAM, Ch. & TANNERY, P. (eds.). Oeuvres de Descartes. Vol. VIII/1. Paris, Vrin, 1982.
DESCARTES, R. Oeuvres de Descartes. 12 vols. Ed. Ch. Adam e P. Tannery. Paris, Vrin, 1980-1989.
DESCARTES, R. Meditações. Trad. de J. Guinsburg e B. Prado Jr. Col. “Os Pensadores”. São Paulo, Nova Cultural, 1988.
DESCARTES, R. Principes de la philosophie. In: ADAM, Ch. & TANNERY, P. (eds.). Oeuvres de Descartes. Vol. IX/2. Paris, J. Vrin, 1989. (Pr)
GABBEY, A. “New doctrines of motion.” In: GARBER, D. & AYERS, M. (eds.). The Cambridge history of seventeenth-century philosophy. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1998, p. 649-79.
GARBER, D. Descartes’ metaphysical physics. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 1992.
GARBER, D. Descartes embodied: reading Cartesian philosophy through Cartesian science. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2001.
GARBER, D. & AYERS, M. (eds.). The Cambridge history of seventeenth-century philosophy. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1998.
GUÉROULT, M. “Metaphysique et physique de la force chez Descartes et chez Malebranche.” Revue de Metaphysique et de Morale, 59, 1, 1954, p. 1-37.
HATFIELD, G. “Force (God) in Descartes’ physics.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 10, 2, 1979, p. 113-40.
HUTCHINSON, K. “What happened to occult qualities in the scientific revolution.” Isis, 73, 1982, p. 233-53.
KOYRÉ, A. Études newtoniennes. Paris, Gallimard, 1968.
LIMONGI, M. I. “Hobbes e o conatus: da física à teoria das paixões.” Discurso, 31, 2000, p. 417-39.
NADLER, S. “Doctrines of explanation in late scholasticism and in the mechanical philosophy.” In:
GARBER, D. & AYERS, M. (eds.). The Cambridge history of seventeenth-century philosophy. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1998, p. 513-52.
NEWTON, I. O peso e o equilíbrio dos fluidos. Trad. de L. J. Baraúna. Col. “Os Pensadores”. São Paulo, Abril Cultural, 1979.
WESTFALL, R. S. Force in Newton’s physics: the science of dynamics in the seventeenth century. Londres, MacDonald, 1971.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2003 Scientiae Studia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
A revista detém os direitos autorais de todos os textos nela publicados. Os autores estão autorizados a republicar seus textos mediante menção da publicação anterior na revista. A revista adota a Licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.
