Modes of irreductibility of emergent properties

Authors

  • Charbel Niño El-Hani Universidade Federal da Bahia. Instituto de Biologia
  • João Queiroz Universidade Federal da Bahia. Instituto de Biologia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-31662005000100002

Keywords:

Emergent properties, Irreducibility, Non-analisability, Non-deducibility, Reductionism, Emergentism

Abstract

This paper takes a review of the central tenets of emergentist philosophies and a characterization of some varieties of emergentism as a starting point for treating one of the most controversial theses related to that philosophical doctrine, namely, the 'irreducibility' thesis. The main contention here is that the meaning of this thesis should be refined, if we wish to advance in the discussion about the senses in which one can say that emergent properties are 'irreducible'. Based on works by Stephan and colleagues, two modes of the irreducibility of emergent properties are distinguished, irreducibility as non-analisability and irreducibility as non-deducibility. A detailed analysis of the irreducibility concept leads to the following question: What does it mean to say that a given class of emergent properties is irreducible? We argue here that different classes of properties can be irreducible in different senses, and, thus, according to different modes of irreducibility. The paper discusses, in particular, the mode of irreducibility which holds in the case of properties of biological systems. We argue that emergent properties of biological systems are irreducible in the sense that it is not possible to deduce their instantiation in living systems of a certain class from knowledge about simpler living systems only. In other words, biological emergent properties are irreducible in terms of their non-deducibility, but they aren't irreducible in terms of their non-analisability. A clear understanding of the mode of irreducibility which holds in the case of biological properties makes it possible that the requisites for the demonstration of their emergent nature be more realistic, and the discussions about the prospects and limits of reductionism in biological sciences advance in a consistent manner.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allen, T. F. H. & Starr, T. B. Hierarchy: perspectives for ecological complexity. In: Keller, D. R. & Golley,

F. B. (Ed.). The philosophy of ecology: from science to synthesis. Athens, The University of Georgia Press, 1982. p. 226-31.

Andersen, P. B.; Emmeche, C.; Finnemann, N. O.; Christiansen, P. V. (Ed.). Downward causation: minds, bodies, and matter. Aarhus, Aarhus University Press, 2000.

Audesirk, T.; Audersirk, G. & Byers, B. E. Biology: life on earth.La Salle, Prentice Hall, 2001.

Bailey, A. Supervenience and physicalism. Synthese, 117, p. 53-73, 1999.

Bechtel, W. & Richardson, R.C. Discovering complexity: decomposition and localization as strategies in scientific research. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1993.

Beckermann, A.; Flohr, H. & Kim, J. (Ed.). Emergence or reduction? Essays on the prospects of nonreductive physicalism. Berlim/Nova Iorque, Walter de Gruyter, 1992.

Bickhard, M. H. & Campbell, D. T. Emergence. In: Andersen, P. B.; Emmeche, C.; Finnemann, N. O.; Christiansen, P. V. (Ed.). Downward causation: minds, bodies, and matter. Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, 2000. p. 322-48.

Blitz, D. Emergent evolution: qualitative novelty and the levels of reality. Dordrecht, Kluwer, 1992.

Boogerd, F. C.; Bruggeman, F. J.; Richardson, R. C.; Stephan, A. & Westerhoff, H. Emergence and its place in nature: a case study of biochemical networks. Disponível em : Acesso em: 16 mar. 2004.

Boyd, R.; Gasper, P. & Trout, J. D. (Ed.). The philosophy of science. Cambridge, MIT Press, 1991.

Broad, C. D. Mechanical explanation and its alternatives. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 19, p. 86-124, 1919.

Broad, C. D. The mind and its place in nature. Londres, Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co, 1925.

Bruggeman, F. J.; Westerhoff, H. V. & Boogerd, F. C. Biocomplexity: a pluralist research strategy is necessary for a mechanistic explanation of the “live” state. Philosophical Psychology, 15, 4, p. 411-40, 2002.

Bunge, M. Levels and reduction. American Journal of Physiology, 233, p. R75-R82, 1977.

Campbell, N. A. & Reece, J. B. Biology. San Francisco, The Benjamim/Cummings, 2002.

Carrier, M. & Machamer, P. K. (Ed.). Mindscape: philosophy, science, and the mind. Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Press, 1997.

Castro, T. A. & El-Hani, C. N. O uso do conceito de propriedades emergentes e de conceitos relacionados em livros didáticos de biologia do ensino superior. Atas do III Encontro Nacional de Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências (ENPEC). Porto Alegre, ABRAPEC, 2003a.

Castro, T. A. & El-Hani, C. N. O uso do conceito de propriedades emergentes e de conceitos relacionados em livros didáticos de biologia do ensino superior: um estudo de caso. Coletânea do I Encontro Regional de Ensino de Biologia do Nordeste. Feira de Santana-BA, UEFS, 2003b. Cunningham, B. The reemergence of “emergence”. Philosophy of Science, 68, p. S62-S75, 2001. (PSA 2000 Proceedings)

El Hani, C. N. Níveis da ciência, níveis da realidade. São Paulo, 2000. Tese (Doutorado em Educação). Faculdade de Educação, Universidade de São Paulo.

El Hani, C. N. On the reality of emergents. Principia, 6, 1, p. 51-87, 2002.

El Hani, C. N. Pluralismo metodológico na pesquisa biológica: indo além do reducionismo. No prelo.

El-Hani, C. N. & Emmeche, C. On some theoretical grounds for an organism-centered biology: property emergence, supervenience, and downward causation. Theory in Biosciences, 119, p. 234-75, 2000.

El-Hani, C. N. & Pereira, A. M. Understanding biological causation. In: Hardcastle, V.G. (Ed.). Where biology meets psychology: philosophical essays. Cambridge, MIT Press, 1999. p. 333-56.

El-Hani, C. N. & Pereira, A. M. Higher-level descriptions: why should we preserve them? In: Andersen, P.B.; Emmeche, C.;

Finnemann, N.O.; Christiansen, P.V. (Ed.). Downward causation: minds, bodies, and matter. Aarhus, Aarhus University Press, 2000. p. 118-42.

El-Hani, C. N. & Pihlström, S. Emergence theories and pragmatic realism. Essays in Philosophy, 3, 2, 2002a.

El-Hani, C. N. & Pihlström, S. A pragmatic realist view of emergence. Manuscrito, 25, p. 105-54, 2002b.

El-Hani, C. N. & Pihlström, S. Realismo, pragmatismo e emergência. In: Silva Filho, W. J. (Ed.). Davidson e a filosofia. No prelo.

El-hani, C. N. & Queiroz, J. Semiose como processo emergente. No prelo.

El-Hani, C. N. & Videira, A. A. P. Causação descendente, emergência de propriedades e modos causais aristotélicos. Theoria, 16, 2, p. 301-29, 2001.

Emmeche, C.; Koppe, S. & Stjernfelt, F. Explaining emergence: towards an ontology of levels. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 28, p. 83-119, 1997.

Emmeche, C.; Koppe, S. & Stjernfelt, F. Levels, emergence and three versions of downward causation. In: Andersen, P.B.; Emmeche, C.; Finnemann, N.O.; Christiansen, P.V. (Ed.). Downward causation: minds, bodies, and matter. Aarhus, Aarhus University Press, 2000. p. 13-34.

Globus, G. G.; Maxwell, G. & Savodnik, I. (Ed.). Consciousness and the brain: a scientific and philosophical inquiry. Nova Iorque, Plenum Press, 1976.

Griffiths, D. Introduction to elementary particles. Nova Iorque, John Wiley & Sons, 1987.

Hardcastle, V.G. (Ed.). Where biology meets psychology: philosophical essays. Cambridge, MIT Press, 1999.

Heil, J. Supervenience deconstructed. European Journal of Philosophy, 6, p. 146-55, 1998.

Hiett, P. J. The place of life in our theories. Biosystems, 47, p. 157-76, 1998.

Honderich, T. (Ed.). The Oxford companion to philosophy. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1995.

Keller, D. R. & Golley, F. B. (Ed.). The philosophy of ecology: from science to synthesis. Athens, The University of Georgia Press, 1982.

Kim, J. “Downward causation” in emergentism and non-reductive materialism. In: Beckermann, A.; Flohr, H. & Kim, J. (Ed.). Emergence or reduction? Essays on the prospects of nonreductive physicalism. Berlim/Nova Iorque, Walter de Gruyter, 1992. p. 119-38.

Kim, J. (Ed.). Supervenience and mind. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1993.

Kim, J. Supervenience as a philosophical concept. In: Kim, J. (Ed.). Supervenience and mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993. p.131-60.

Kim, J. Philosophy of mind. Boulder, Westview Press, 1996.

Kim, J. Supervenience, emergence, and realization in the philosophy of mind. In: Carrier, M.&

Machamer, P. K. (Ed.). Mindscape: philosophy, science, and the mind. Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Press, 1997. p. 271-93.

Machamer, P. K. Mind in a physical world: an essay on the mind-body problem and mental causation. Cambridge/Londres, The MIT Press, 1998.

Machamer, P. K. Making sense of emergence. Philosophical Studies, 95, p. 3-36, 1999.

Levine, J. Materialism and qualia: the explanatory gap. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 64, p. 354-61, 1983.

Loehle, C. & Pechmann, J. H. K. Evolution: the missing ingredient in systems ecology. American Naturalist, 132, p. 884-99, 1988.

Mclaughlin, B. P. The rise and fall of british emergentism. In: Beckermann, A.; Flohr, H. & Kim, J. (Ed.). Emergence or reduction? Essays on the prospects of nonreductive physicalism. Berlin, Walter de Gruyter, 1992. p. 49-93.

O’Connor, T. Emergent properties. American Philosophical Quarterly, 31, p. 91-104, 1994.

Odum, E. P. The emergence of ecology as a new integrative discipline. Science, 195, p. 1289-93, 1977.

Odum, E. P. Ecologia. Rio de Janeiro, Guanabara, 1988.

Oppenheim, P. & Putnam, H. Unity of science as a working hypothesis. In: Boyd, R.; Gasper, P. & Trout, J. D. (Ed.). The philosophy of science. Cambridge, MIT Press, 1991 [1958]. p. 405-27.

Pihlström, S. The re-emergence of the emergence debate. Principia, 6, 1, p. 133-81, 2002.

Popper, K.R. & Eccles, J.C. The self and its brain. Londres, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1986 [1977].

Queiroz, J. & El-Hani, C. N. Semiosis as an emergent process. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. No prelo.

Rescher, N. Process metaphysics: an introduction to process philosophy. Nova Iorque, SUNY Press, 1996.

Ruppert, E. E. & Barnes, R. D. Zoologia dos invertebrados. São Paulo, Roca, 1996.

Ruse, M. Reductionism. In: Honderich, T. (Ed.). The Oxford companion to philosophy. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1995. p. 750-1.

Salthe, S. N. Evolving hierarchical systems: their structure and representation. Nova Iorque, Columbia University Press, 1985.

Schoener, T. W. Mechanistic approaches to ecology: a new reductionism? American Zoologist, 26, p. 81-106, 1986.

Schröder, J. Emergence: non-deducibility or downwards causation? Philosophical Quarterly, 48, p. 433-52, 1998.

Silva Filho, W. J. (Ed.). Davidson e a filosofia. No prelo.

Simon, H. The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MIT Press, 1969.

Stephan, A. Varieties of emergence in artificial and natural systems. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung, 53c, p. 639-56, 1998.

Stephan, A. Emergenz: von der Unvorhersagbarkeit zur Selbstorganisation. Dresden/München, Dresden University Press, 1999a.

Stephan, A. Varieties of emergentism. Evolution and Cognition, 5, p. 49-59, 1999b.

Wimsatt, W. C. Reductionism, levels of organization and the mind-body problem. In: Globus, G. G.; Maxwell, G. & Savodnik, I. (Ed.). Consciousness and the brain: a scientific and philosophical inquiry. Nova Iorque, Plenum Press, 1976. p. 199-267.

Wimsatt, W. C. Aggregativity: reductive heuristics for finding emergence. Philosophy of Science,64, p. S373–S384, 1997.

Published

2005-03-01

Issue

Section

Artigos

How to Cite

Modes of irreductibility of emergent properties . (2005). Scientiae Studia, 3(1), 9-41. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-31662005000100002