From field to laboratory: the institutionalization of molecular biology in Argentine

Authors

  • Pablo Ariel Pellegrini Universidad Nacional de Quilmes. Instituto de Estudios sobre la Ciencia y la Tecnología

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-31662013000300005

Abstract

This article aims to investigate the process of institutionalization of a new scientific discipline. In particular, the displacements that occur between disciplines with the emergence of a new one: molecular biology. The case presented in this article is the National Institute of Agricultural Technology (INTA) of Argentina, institution created in 1956 for research, innovation and extension to the agricultural sector. Thus, the paper presents the changes in the disciplines from which INTA's researchers come, since its inception in 1956 until 2010. The research presented in this article focuses on a quantitative analysis in relation to the disciplines of origin of the researchers who joined the institution. By showing the displacements between disciplines, this article aims to contribute to the study of the conflicts between them. For it suggests that the emergence of a new discipline involves not only the opening of new professions, institutions, research subjects and techniques, but also the displacement of other previously installed. These displacements would be at the root of the tensions that occur in the institutionalization of a new discipline.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ben-David, J. Roles and innovations in medicine. American Journal of Sociology, 65, 6, p. 557-68, 1960.

Ben-David, J. & Collins, R. Social factors in the origins of a new science: the case of psychology. American Sociological Review, 31, 4, p. 451-65, 1966.

Bourdieu, P. Le champ scientifique. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, 2, 2, p. 88-104, 1976.

Castoriadis, C. El mundo fragmentado. Buenos Aires: Editorial Altamira, 1990.

Durkheim, É. Las reglas del método sociológico. Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva, 2006 [1895].

Favret, E. Ewald Alfredo Favret: un eximio concertista en la sinfonía de los genes. Manejo Integrado de Plagas y Agroecología, 74, p. 1-3, 2005.

Ferrari, V. & Ronfani, P. A deeply rooted scientific discipline: origins and development of sociology of law in Italy. The American Sociologist, 32, 2, p. 61-77, 2001.

Foucault, M. La arqueología del saber. Buenos Aires: Siglo Veintiuno, 2006 [1969].

Freudenthal, G. & Löwy, I. Ludwik Fleck’s roles in society: a case study using Joseph Ben-David’s paradigm for a sociology of knowledge. Social Studies of Science, 18, p. 625-51, 1988.

Gullahorn, J. T. & Gullahorn, J. E. Role conflict and its resolution. The Sociological Quarterly, 4, 1, p. 32-48, 1963.

Harten, A. M. van. Mutation breeding: theory and practical applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

Inta. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. El Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Agropecuarias. Buenos Aires, 1959.

Inta. Nota N° 634 del 14 de diciembre de 1987. Asunto: formulación del Programa de ‘Biotecnología de Avanzada’, 1987a.

Inta. Nota N° D.A. 663 del 24 de noviembre de 1987. Asunto: comentarios sobre borrador Programa de Biotecnología, 1987b.

Inta. Informe anual del Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias Veterinarias, 1989.

Inta. INTA, medio siglo al servicio del campo argentino. Buenos Aires, 2006.

Katz, J. & Bercovich, N. Innovación genética, esfuerzos públicos de investigación y desarrollo y la frontera tecnológica internacional: nuevos híbridos en el INTA. Desarrollo Económico, 28, 110, p. 209-43, 1988.

Knorr-Cetina, K. Scientific communities or transepistemic arenas of research? A critique of quasieconomic models of science. Social Studies of Science, 12, 1, p. 101-30, 1982.

Knorr-Cetina, K. Epistemic cultures: how the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999.

Kohler, R. E. From medical chemistry to biochemistry. The making of a biomedical discipline. Cambrige: Cambridge University Press, 1982.

Kreimer, P. Ciencia y periferia: nacimiento, muerte y resurrección de la biología molecular en la Argentina. Buenos Aires: Eudeba, 2010.

Krohn, W. & Schäfer, W. The origins and structure of agricultural chemistry. In: Lemaine, G. et al. (Ed.). Perspectives on the emergence of scientific disciplines. Chicago: Aldine, 1976. p. 27-52.

Kutschera, U. Palaeobiology: the origin and evolution of a scientific discipline. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 22, 4, p. 172-3, 2007.

Ledesma-Mateos, I. Biología, institución y profesión: centros y periferias. México: Educación y Cultura, 2009.

Lemaine, G. et al. (Ed.). Perspectives on the emergence of scientific disciplines. Chicago: Aldine, 1976.

Lemaine, G. Introduction: problems in the emergence of new disciplines. In: Lemaine, G. et al. (Ed.). Perspectives on the emergence of scientific disciplines. Chicago: Aldine, 1976. p. 1-23.

Lenoir, T. The discipline of nature and the nature of disciplines. In: Messer-Davidow, E.; Shumway, D. R. & Sylvan, D. J. (Ed.). Knowledges: historical and critical studies in disciplinarity. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1997. p. 70-102.

Messer-Davidow, E.; Shumway, D. R. & Sylvan, D. J. (Ed.). Knowledges: historical and critical studies in disciplinarity. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1997.

Morange, M. A history of molecular biology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1994.

Mudry, M. D. & Wisnivesky, M. C. Aportes a la discusión sobre la reforma curricular de la licenciatura en ciencias biológicas. Buenos Aires: La Copia, 2000.

Mullins, N. C. The development of a scientific specialty: the Phage Group and the origins of molecular biology. Minerva, 10, p. 51-82, 1972.

Nun, J. Argentina: el Estado y las actividades científicas y tecnológicas. Redes, 2, 3, p. 59-98, 1995.

Nye, M. J. From chemical philosophy to theoretical chemistry: dynamics of matter and dynamics of disciplines, 1800-1950. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1993.

Nyhart, L. K. Biology takes form: animal morphology and the German universities, 1800-1900. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.

Ota. Office of Technology Assessment. Commercial biotechnology: an international analysis. U.S. Congress, Washington, DC, 1984.

Pellegrini, P. A. Transgénicos, ciencia, agricultura y controversias en la Argentina. Bernal: Editorial de la Universidad Nacional de Quilmes, 2013.

Pellegrini, P. A. Anomalías en los comienzos de la transgénesis vegetal. Intereses e interpretaciones en torno a las primeras plantas transgénicas. História, Ciências, Saúde. Manguinhos. En prensa.

Roy, A. L’influence des cultures du risque sur l’expertise scientifique. Le cas des OGM. Économie Rurale, 271, p. 35-48, 2002.

Servos, J. W. Physical chemistry from Ostwald to Pauling: the making of a science in America. Princeton: Princeton Academic Press, 1996.

Shinn, T. Intellectual cohesion and organizational divisions in science. Revue Française de Sociologie, 43, Supplement: An Annual English Selection, p. 99-122, 2002.

Stent, G. S. That was the molecular biology that was. Science, 160, 3826, p. 390-5, 1968.

Suárez-Díaz, E. Molecular evolution: concepts and the origin of disciplines. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 40, p. 43-53, 2009.

Tuunainen, J. When disciplinary worlds collide: the organizational ecology of disciplines in a university department. Symbolic Interaction, 28, 2, p. 205-28, 2005.

Uba. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Plan de estudios de la carrera de Agronomía, 1999.

Uba. Plan de estudios de la carrera de Agronomía, 2008a.

Uba. Plan de estudios de la licenciatura en Ciencias Biológicas, 2008b.

Zabala, J. P. Vacunas y vacunos: la lucha antiaftosa y la producción de conocimientos científicos y tecnológicos en Argentina. In: Hernández, A. A. et al. (Org.). Ciencias agrícolas y cultura científica en América Latina. Buenos Aires: Prometeo Libros, 2005. p. 273-89.

Downloads

Published

2013-01-01

Issue

Section

Artigos

How to Cite

From field to laboratory: the institutionalization of molecular biology in Argentine . (2013). Scientiae Studia, 11(3), 531-556. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-31662013000300005