Refinements of the interpretation of complementarity from Afshar's experiment

Authors

  • Osvaldo Pessoa Júnior Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-31662013000100006

Keywords:

Afshar’s experiment, Complementarity, Foundations of quantum mechanics, Mach-Zehnder interferometer, Philosophy of physics, Quantum-mechanical state, Retrodiction, Unruh’s experiment, Wave-particle duality

Abstract

Afshar's experiment was recently proposed as a violation of the principle of complementarity. Acknowledging the novelty brought by the experiment, we argue that it allows a refinement of this principle, with the establishment of two points: (1) the possibility of modifying the "type" of phenomenon (wave or particle) without changing the quantum-mechanical state, and (2) the recognition that the type of phenomenon, associated to a detected quantum, refers to a specific region traversed by the quantum object. The first point is explored in Mach-Zehnder interferometers, with polarization devices and in Unruh's double setup. The second point emphasizes that a phenomenon can be corpuscular with respect one region and undulatory with respect to another. Afshar's originality lies in his proposal of a way of ascertaining both simultaneously. Restriction (1) turns out having a negligible effect in Afshar's experiment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afshar, S. S. Sharp complementary wave and particle behaviors in the same welcher weg experiment. 2003. Disponível em: <http://www.irims.org/quant-ph/030503>. Acesso em: 28 fev. 2012.

Afshar, S. S. et al. Paradox in wave-particle duality. Foundations of Physics, 37, p. 295-305, 2007.

Bohm, D. Quantum theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1951.

Bohr, N. O postulado quântico e o recente desenvolvimento da teoria atômica. In: Pessoa Jr., O. (Ed.). Fundamentos da física 1 – Simpósio David Bohm. São Paulo: Livraria da Física, 2000 [1928]. p. 135-59.

Bohr, N. A descrição da realidade física fornecida pela mecânica quântica pode ser considerada completa? Tradução C. W. Abramo. Cadernos de História e Filosofia da Ciência, 2, p. 97-106, 1981 [1935].

Bohr, N. O debate com Einstein sobre problemas epistemológicos na física atômica. In: Bohr, N. Física atômica e conhecimento humano, ensaios 1932-1957. Tradução V. Ribeiro. Rio de Janeiro: Contraponto, 1995 [1949]. p. 41-83.

Grangier, P. et al. Experimental evidence for a photon anticorrelation effect on a beam splitter: a new light on single-photon interferences. Europhysics Letters, 1, p. 173-9, 1986.

Heisenberg, W. The physical principles of the quantum theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1930.

Hellmuth, T. et al. Delayed-choice experiments in quantum interference. Physical Review A, 35, p. 2532-41, 1997.

Herzog, T. J. et al. Complementarity and the quantum eraser. Physical Review Letters, 75, p. 3034-7, 1995.

Kastner, R. E. Why the Afshar experiment does not refute complementarity. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 36, p. 649-58, 2005.

Jammer, M. The philosophy of quantum mechanics. New York: Wiley, 1974.

Marlow, A. R. (Ed.), Mathematical foundations of quantum theory. New York: Academic, 1978.

Pessoa Jr., O. Complementing the principle of complementarity. Physics Essays, 13, p. 50-67, 2000a.

Pessoa Jr., O. (Ed.). Fundamentos da física 1 – Simpósio David Bohm. São Paulo: Livraria da Física, 2000b.

Pessoa Jr., O. Conceitos da física quântica. São Paulo: Livraria da Física, 2003. v. 1.

Unruh, W. Shahriar Afshar – quantum rebel? 2004. Disponível em: <http://axion.physics.ubc.ca/rebel.html>. Acesso em: 28 fev. 2012.

Vaidman, L. et al. How to ascertain the values of sx, s y, and sz of a spin-½ particle. Physical Review Letters, 58, p. 1385-7, 1987.

Wheeler, J.A. The “past” and the “delayed-choice” double-slit experiment. In: Marlow, A. R. (Ed.), Mathematical foundations of quantum theory. New York: Academic, 1978. p. 9-48.

Wootters, W. K. & Zurek, W .H. Complementarity in the double slit experiment: quantum non-separability and a quantitative statement of Bohr’s principle. Physical Review D, 19, p. 473-84, 1979.

Published

2013-03-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Refinements of the interpretation of complementarity from Afshar’s experiment . (2013). Scientiae Studia, 11(1), 119-139. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-31662013000100006