Perspectivism in philosophy of science: a case-study in quantum physics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-31662013000100008Abstract
In this article we present a particular view of the development of scientific theories which (following Ortega y Gasset), we term "perspectivism". Making use of this view, we discuss how we can accommodate distinct and apparently incompatible descriptions of a supposed reality under investigation. We distinguish between a "reality" (R) and its "empirical description", (Re). Acknowledging that we can have diverse empirical descriptions of the same reality, we discuss the particular case in which the view is applied to current debates on the ontology of quantum physics, especially of non-relativistic quantum mechanics. As it is well known, this theory is compatible with treating quantum objects either as individuals or as non-individuals. Both ontologies are possible and deserve to be developed. We propose that the perspectivism developed here is neutral not only with respect to the choice of an ontology, but also concerning the debates among realists and anti-realists in the philosophy of science. We conclude that to go beyond the pluralism accepted by perspectivism, and to adopt realism or anti-realism, involves commitment to strong theses about the relation between reality and its descriptions.Downloads
References
Adams, R. M. Primitive thisness and primitive identity. The Journal of Philosophy, 76, 1, 1979. p. 5-26.
Arenhart, J. R. B. & Krause, D. Indistinguibilidade, não reflexividade, ontologia e física quântica. Scientiae Studia, 10, 1, p. 41-69, 2012.
Auyang, S., How is quantum field theory possible? Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.
Brading, K. & Castellani, E. (Ed.). Symmetries in physics: philosophical reflections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
Bridges, D. Constructive mathematics. In: Zalta, N. (Ed.). The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, 2012. Disponível em: <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2012/ entries/mathematics-constructive/>. Acesso em: 20 jun. 2012.
Cao, T. Y. (Ed.). Conceptual foundations of quantum field theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Castellani, E. (Ed.). Interpreting bodies: classical and quantum objects in modern physics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998.
da Costa, N. C. A. & Krause, D., The logic of complementarity. In: van Benthem, J.; Heinzmann, G.; Rebuschi, M. & Visser, H. (Ed.). The age of alternative logics: assessing philosophy of logic and mathematics today. Dordrecht: Springer, 2006. p. 103-20.
da Costa, N. C. A. & Krause, D. Physics, inconsistencies, and quasi-truth, Synthese. No prelo.
da Costa, N. C. A. et al. Sobre uma fundamentação não reflexiva da mecânica quântica. Scientiae Studia, 10, 1, p. 71-104, 2012.
D’Espagnat, B. Veiled reality: an analysis of present day-quantum mechanical concepts. Colorado: Westview Press, 2003.
D’Espagnat, B. On physics and reality. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006.
Devitt, M. Underdetermination and realism. Philosophical Issues, 12, p. 26-50, 2002.
Falkenburg, B. Particle metaphysics: a critical account of subatomic reality. Berlin/ Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2007.
French, S. On the withering away of physical objects. In: Castellani, E. (Ed.). Interpreting bodies: classical and quantum objects in modern physics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998. p. 93-113.
French, S. Metaphysical underdetermination: why worry? Synthese, 180, p. 205-21, 2011. French, S. & Krause, D. Identity in physics. A historical, philosophical and formal analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
French, S. & Rickles, D. Understanding permutation symmetry. In: Brading, K. & Castellani, E. (Ed.). Symmetries in physics: philosophical reflections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. p. 212-38.
Ortega y Gasset, J. El espectador. Madrid: Editorial EDAF, 1998.
Groner, R.; Groner, M. & Bischof, W. F. (Ed.). Methods of heuristics. Hillsdale: Erlbaum, 1983.
Heisenberg, W. A parte e o todo: encontros e conversas sobre física, filosofia, religião e política. Rio de Janeiro: Contraponto, 1996.
Krause, D. The metaphysics of non-individuality. In: Krause, D. & Videira, A. A. (Ed.). Brazilian studies in philosophy and history of science. Boston: Springer, 2010. (Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 290). cap. 19, p. 257-67.
Krause, D. & Videira, A. A. (Ed.). Brazilian studies in philosophy and history of science. Boston: Springer, 2010. (Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 290).
Krause, D. et al. Axiomatization and models of scientific theories. Foundations of Science, 16, p. 363-82, 2011.
Ladyman, J. What is structural realism? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 29, 3, p. 409-24, 1998.
Ladyman, J. Structural Realism. In: Zalta, N. (Ed.). The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, 2009. Disponível em: <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2009/ entries/structural-realism/>. Acesso em: 20 jun. 2012.
Mortensen, C. Inconsistent mathematics. In: Zalta, N. (Ed.). The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, 2008. Disponível em: <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/mathematics-inconsistent/>. Acesso em: 20 jun. 2012.
Paul, L. A., Metaphysics as modeling: the handmaiden’s tale. Philosophical Studies, 160, 1, p. 1-29, 2012.
Popper, K. R. Three worlds. Michigan: The Tanner Lecture on Human Values, Delivered at the University of Michigan, 1978.
Rohrlich, F. On the ontology of QFT. In: Cao, T. Y. (Ed.). Conceptual foundations of quantum field theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. p. 357-67.
Suppes, P. Heuristics and the axiomatic method. In: Groner, R.; Groner, M. & Bischof, W. F. (Ed.). Methods of heuristics. Hillsdale: Erlbaum, 1983. p. 79-88.
Suppes, P. Representation and invariance of scientific theories. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information, 2002.
van Benthem, J.; Heinzmann, G.; Rebuschi, M. & Visser, H. (Ed.). The age of alternative logics: assessing philosophy of logic and mathematics today. Dordrecht: Springer, 2006.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2013 Scientiae Studia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
A revista detém os direitos autorais de todos os textos nela publicados. Os autores estão autorizados a republicar seus textos mediante menção da publicação anterior na revista. A revista adota a Licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.
