Technology as a philosophical problem: three perspectives

Authors

  • Alberto Cupani Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Centro de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-31662004000400003

Keywords:

Philosophy of technology, Mario Bunge, Albert Borgmann, Andrew Feenberg

Abstract

The philosophical study of technology is rather recent and diversified, according to different theoretical orientations and their corresponding social stances. This heterogeneity notwithstanding, or perhaps due to it, philosophy of technology helps us to acknowledge technology as a dimension of human life, not merely as a historical event. This is what I want to show here by means of presenting three modes of philosophical investigation of technology: Mario Bunge's, Albert Borgmann's, and Andrew Feenberg's. They illustrate, respectively, an analytical point of view, a phenomenological approach, and an examination inspired by the School of Frankfurt. The main purpose of this article is to divulge those investigations, which are not very well known among us. Nevertheless, the article also contains a brief critical judgment of them.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arendt, H. A condição humana. Rio de Janeiro, Forense, 1983 [1958].

Borgmann, A. Technology and the character of contemporary life. A philosophical inquiry. Chicago/Londres, The University of Chicago Press, 1984.

Borgmann, A. Reply. In: Durbin, P. T. (Ed.). Technology and contemporary life. Dordrecht, Reidel, 1988. p. 29-44.

Bunge, M. La investigación científica. Barcelona, Ariel, 1969.

Bunge, M. Treatise on basic philosophy. Dordrecht, Reidel, 1984-1989. 8 v.

Bunge, M. Epistemologia. São Paulo, T. A. Queiros/Edusp, 1980.

Bunge, M. Seudociencia e ideología. Madri, Alianza, 1985a.

Bunge, M. Treatise on basic philosophy. Dordrecht, Reidel, 1985b. Tomo 7: Philosophy of science and technology.

Bunge, M. Treatise on basic philosophy. Dordrecht, Reidel, 1989. Tomo 8: The good and the right.

Carpenter, S. R. A discussion. In: Durbin, P. T. (Ed.). Technology and contemporary life. Dordrecht, Reidel, 1988. p. 1-12.

Durbin, P. T. (Ed.). Technology and contemporary life. Dordrecht, Reidel, 1988.

Feenberg, A. Transforming technology. A critical theory revisited. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002.

Habermas, J. Theorie und Praxis. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp, 1968.

Heidegger, M. Sein und Zeit. Tübingen, Max Niemeyer, 1967.

Heidegger, M. A questão da técnica. Cadernos de tradução, n. 2, Departamento de Filosofia-USP, 1997 [1954].

Lacey, H. Is science value free? Londres, Routledge, 1999.

Ladrière, J. Os desafios da racionalidade. Petrópolis, Vozes, 1979.

Mitcham, C. Thinking through technology. The path between engineering and philosophy. Chicago/Londres, The University of Chicago Press, 1994.

Ortega y Gasset, J. Meditación de la técnica. Madri, Espasa-Calpe, 1965.

Stanley, M. A critical appreciation. In: Durbin, P. T. (Ed.). Technology and contemporary life. Dordrecht, Reidel, 1988. p. 13-28.

Published

2004-12-01

Issue

Section

Artigos

How to Cite

Technology as a philosophical problem: three perspectives . (2004). Scientiae Studia, 2(4), 493-518. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-31662004000400003