Cosmology and theoretical pluralism

Authors

  • Marcelo Byrro Ribeiro Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de Física
  • Antonio Augusto Passos Videira Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-31662004000400004

Keywords:

Cosmology, Boltzmann, Epistemology, Theoretical pluralism, Dogmatism, Philosophy of science

Abstract

This work discusses the presence of a dogmatic tendency in the main stream of modern cosmology. By means of a detailed reading of some texts which represent researchers in this area, we conclude that a dogmatic thinking does seem to exist in this particular area of research. We also discuss how badly this kind of thinking affects the development of modern cosmology, as well as a possible way of neutralizing its influence. The proposed solution lies in the philosophical thinking of the Austrian physicist Ludwig Boltzmann (1844-1906). In particular, we use his two main epistemological theses, theoretical pluralism and scientific theories as representation of nature, to show that once these theses are absorved into the scientific practice, there is no longer any reason for dogmatic attitudes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Boltzmann, L. Über die Unentbehrlichkeit der Atomistik in der Naturwissenschaft. In: Boltzmann, L. Populäre Schrifte. Leipzig, J. A. Barth, 1905 [1896]. p. 141-57.

Coleman, P. H. & Pietronero, L. The fractal structure of the Universe. Physics Reports, 213, p. 311-89, 1992.

Dingle, H. Science and modern cosmology. Science, 120, p. 513-21, oct. 1954.

Ellis, G.; Lanza, A. & Miller, J. C. (Ed.). The renaissance of general relativity and cosmology (A survey to celebrate the 65th birthday of Dennis Sciama). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1993.

Krasinski, A. Inhomogeneous cosmological models. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1997.

MacCallum, M. A. H. Strengths and weakness of cosmological big bang theory. In: Stoeger, W. R. (Ed.). Theory and observational limits in cosmology (Proceedings of the Vatican Observatory Conference). Vaticano, Specola Vaticana, 1987. p. 121-41.

MacCallum, M. A. H. Anisotropic and inhomogeneous cosmologies. In: Ellis, G.; Lanza, A. & Miller, J. C. (Ed.). The renaissance of general relativity and cosmology (A survey to celebrate the 65th birthday of Dennis Sciama). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1993. p. 213-33.

North, J. D. The measure of the Universe. A history of modern cosmology. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1965.

Rothman, T. & Ellis, G. F. R. Has cosmology become metaphysical? Astronomy, 15, 2, p. 6-22, 1987.

Sciama, D.W. Modern cosmology and the dark matter problem. Cambridge, Cambridge Universiy Press, 1993.

Stoeger, W. R. (Ed.). Theory and observational limits in cosmology (Proceedings of the Vatican Observatory Conference). Vaticano, Specola Vaticana, 1987.

Tolman, R.C. Effect of inhomogeneity on cosmological models. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, Washington, 20, p. 169-76, 1934.

Vaucouleurs, G. de. The case for a hierarchical cosmology. Science, 167, p. 1203-13, 1970.

Videira, A. A. P. Atomisme epistémologique et pluralisme théorique dans la pensée de Boltzmann. Paris, 1992. Tese (Doutorado em História da Ciência). Universidade de Paris 7 – Denis Diderot.

Videira, A. A. P. Boltzmann: um físico-filósofo. Ciência Hoje, 96, p. 44-9, dez. 1993.

Videira, A. A. P. O atomismo epistemológico de Boltzmann. Cadernos de História e Filosofia das Ciências, 7, 1, p. 48-91, 1997.

Videira, A. L. L. & Videira, A. A. P. Boltzmann and the Luebeck meeting of 1895: atomism, energetism and physical theory. In: Videira, A. A. P. & Salinas, S. (Org.). A cultura da física: contribuições em homenagem a Amélia Império Hamburger. São Paulo, Editora Livraria da Física, 2001. p. 163-73.

Wesson, P. S. Problems with the way in which cosmology is done. In: Stoeger, W. R. (Ed.). Theory and observational limits in cosmology (Proceedings of the Vatican Observatory Conference). Vaticano, Specola Vaticana, 1987. p. 559-63.

Published

2004-12-01

Issue

Section

Artigos

How to Cite

Cosmology and theoretical pluralism . (2004). Scientiae Studia, 2(4), 519-535. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-31662004000400004