Maxwell, the field theory and the demechanization of physics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-31662006000200003Keywords:
Action at distance, Aether, Demechanization, Einstein, Electromagnetic field, Electromagnetism, Faraday, Maxwell, Mechanical analogies, MechanismAbstract
This paper surveys the conceptual development of classical field theoy - particularly Maxwell's electrodynamics, as it was presented in the pioneer papers of 1856, 1861/1862 and 1864 and in the Treatise on electricity and magnetism - aiming at getting an understanding of the role it played in the crisis of the mechanistic image of nature. Maxwell's role as a transition character between the mechanistic and the post-mechanistic views stands out clearly when one analyzes the tension that builds up in his texts on electrodynamics between his scientific methodology, on the one hand, and his ontology and cognitive axiology, on the other. This tension reflects the very tension existing between mechanism and demechanization. Special attention is given to an analysis of the role played by the field concept, the mechanical models, analogies, the Lagrangian formalism and the ever-chaning concept of ether. In order to carry out this analysis, we develop a taxonomy of the different kinds of mechanism, and also avail ourselves of concepts brought forth by Larry Laudan's reticulational model of scientific rationality. Some features of the phase prior to Maxwell are discussed besides his electrodynamics - in particular the debate concerning action-at-a-distance, as well as Faraday's views on fields and forces - thus allowing one to better bring into context his research program in electrodynamics. Some latter developments in field theory are also discussed, aiming at getting a clearer notion of how did the demechanization process proceed in the ensuing years, until being finally brought to completion in the twentieth century, with the coming of special and general relativity theory, the full emancipation of the concept of field, and the ultimate demise of the mechanistic worldview.Downloads
References
Abrantes, P. Imagens de natureza, imagens de ciência. Campinas: Papirus, 1998.
Barros, A. L. R. (Ed.). Perspectivas em física teórica: anais do simpósio de física em homenagem ao 70 o aniversário do Prof. Mário Schenberg. São Paulo: Instituto de Física da USP, 1987.
Bezerra, V. A. Racionalidade, consistência, reticulação e coerência: o caso da renormalização na teoria quântica do campo. Scientiae Studia, 1, 2, p. 151-81, 2003a.
Bezerra, V. A. Schola quantorum: progresso, racionalidade e inconsistência na antiga teoria atômica. Parte I: desenvolvimento histórico, 1913-1925. Scientiae Studia, 1, 4, p. 463-517, 2003b.
Bezerra, V. A. Reticulação metodológica na ciência: o caso da renormalização nas teorias de campo de gauge. In: Martins, R. A.; Martins, L. A. C. P.; Silva, C. C. & Ferreira, J. M. H. (Ed.). Filosofia e história da ciência no Cone Sul: 3° encontro. Campinas: AFHIC, 2004a. p. 461-70.
Bezerra, V. A. Schola quantorum: progresso, racionalidade e inconsistência na antiga teoria atômica. Parte II: crítica à leitura lakatosiana. Scientiae Studia, 2, 2, p. 207-37, 2004b.
Bork, A. M. Maxwell and the vector potential. Isis, 58, 2, p. 210-22, 1967.
Bunge, M. Lagrangian formulation and mechanical interpretation. American Journal of Physics, 25, 4, p. 211-8, 1957.
Bunge, M. Mach’s critique of Newtonian mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 34, p. 585-96, 1966.
Chalmers, A. The limitations of Maxwell’s electromagnetic theory. Isis, 64, 4, p. 469-83, 1973.
Chalmers, A. Maxwell, mechanism, and the nature of electricity. Physics in Perspective, 3, p. 425-38, 2001.
Darrigol, O. Electrodynamics from Ampère to Einstein. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Doran, B. G. Origins and consolidation of field theory in nineteenth century Britain: from the mechanical to the electromagnetic view of nature. Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 6, p. 133-260, 1975.
Doughty, N. A. Lagrangian interaction: an introduction to relativistic symmetry in electrodynamics and gravitation. Sydney/Readwood (CA): Addison-Wesley, 1990.
Einstein, A. Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper. Annalen der Physik, ser. 4, 17, p. 891-921, 1905.
Frenkel, J. Princípios de eletrodinâmica clássica. São Paulo: Edusp, 1996.
Goldstein, H.; Poole, C. & Safko, J. Classical mechanics. 3. ed. San Francisco: Addison-Wesley, 2002.
Hesse, M. B. Action at a distance in classical physics. Isis, 46, 4, p. 337-53, 1955.
Hirosige, T. The ether problem, the mechanistic worldview, and the origins of the theory of relativity. Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 7, p. 3-82, 1976.
Jackson, J. D. Classical electrodynamics. 3. ed. New York: Wiley, 1999.
Klein, M. J. Mechanical explanation at the end of the nineteenth century. Centaurus, 17, p. 58-82, 1972.
Lanczos, C. The variational principles of mechanics. 4. ed. New York: Dover, 1986 [1970].
Laudan, L. Science and hypothesis: historical essays on scientific methodology. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1981.
Laudan, L. Science and values: the aims of science and their role in scientific debate. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.
Lévy-Leblond, J.-M. O pensar e a prática da ciência: antinomias da razão. Trad. de M. L. Panzoldo. Bauru: Edusc, 2004.
Martins, R. A.; Martins, L. A. C. P.; Silva, C. C. & Ferreira, J. M. H. (Ed.). Filosofia e história da ciência no Cone Sul: 3° encontro. Campinas: AFHIC, 2004.
Maxwell, J. C. A treatise on electricity and magnetism. New York: Dover, 1954 [1891]. 2 v.
Maxwell, J. C. On Faraday’s lines of force. In: Niven, W. D. (Ed.). The scientific papers of James Clerk Maxwell. Mineola (New York): Dover, 2003a [1856]. v. 1, p. 155-229.
Maxwell, J. C. On physical lines of force. In: Niven, W. D. (Ed.). The scientific papers of James Clerk Maxwell. Mineola (New York): Dover, 2003b [1861/1862]. v. 1, p. 451-513.
Maxwell, J. C. A dynamical theory of the electromagnetic field. In: Niven, W. D. (Ed.). The scientific papers of James Clerk Maxwell. Mineola (New York): Dover, 2003c [1864]. v. 1, p. 526-97.
McMullin, E. The origins of the field concept in physics. Physics in Perspective, 4, p. 13-39, 2002.
Niven, W. D. (Ed.). The scientific papers of James Clerk Maxwell. Mineola (New York): Dover, 2003 [1890]. 2v.
Paty, M. A gênese da causalidade física. Scientiae Studia, 2, 1, p. 9-32, 2004a.
Paty, M. A noção de determinismo na física e seus limites. Scientiae Studia, 2, 4, p. 465-92, 2004b.
Penrose, R. The road to reality: a complete guide to the laws of the universe. London: Jonathan Cape, 2004.
Pyle, A. Atomism and its critics: from Democritus to Newton. Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 1995.
Roche, J. The present status of Maxwell’s displacement current. European Journal of Physics, 19, p. 155-66, 1998.
Romano, R. & Gil, F. (Ed.). Enciclopédia Einaudi: física. Lisboa: Imprensa Nacional/Casa da Moeda, 1993.
Rossi, P. O nascimento da ciência moderna na Europa. Trad. de A. Angonese. Bauru: Edusc, 2001.
Sparzani, A. Força / campo. Trad. de M. Bragança. In: Romano, R. & Gil, F. (Ed.). Enciclopédia Einaudi: física. Lisboa: Imprensa Nacional/Casa da Moeda, 1993. v. 24, p. 287-307.
Stein, H. On the notion of field in Newton, Maxwell, and beyond. In: Stuewer, R. H. (Ed.). Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1970. v. 5: Historical and philosophical perspectives of science, p. 264-310.
Stuewer, R. H. (Ed.). Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1970.
Thidé, B. Electromagnetic field theory. Uppsala: Upsilon Books, 2001.
Turner, J. E. The distinction between “mechanics” and “mechanism”. Philosophy of Science, 7, 1, p. 49-55, 1940
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2006 Scientiae Studia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
A revista detém os direitos autorais de todos os textos nela publicados. Os autores estão autorizados a republicar seus textos mediante menção da publicação anterior na revista. A revista adota a Licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.
