Ciencia, tecnología y democracia: distinciones y conexiones

Authors

  • Andrew Feenberg Simon Fraser University. Canada Research Chair in Philosophy of Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-31662009000100004

Keywords:

Science, Technology, Truth, Utility, Democratic control, Entangled hierarchy

Abstract

This paper argues that despite considerable overlap, science and technology must be distinguished. Research aimed at understanding of nature is controlled by the community of researchers. This distinguishes it from activities aimed at the production of products under the control of organizations such as corporations and government agencies. Even where one and the same activity aims at both truth and utility, it is controlled in these two different contexts. This distinction is traced in the paper through the post-War history of science and society in America, through direct comparison of several cases and their implications, and through a discussion of the paradoxical structure of technology-society relations. These relations constitute an "entangled hierarchy" because social groups form around technical mediations which they in turn mediate and transform. The politics of science and technology differ in that the contribution of social groups to scientific change is far less direct than to technological change.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bridgman, P. W. Scientists and social responsibility. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 4, 3, p. 69-75, 1948.

Callon, M.; Lascoumbes, P. & Barthe, Y. Agir dans un monde incertain. Paris: Seuil, 2001.

Epstein, S. Impure science. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996.

Feenberg, A. Questioning technology. New York: Routledge, 1999.

Hofstadter, D. Gödel, Escher, Bach. New York: Basic Books, 1979.

Kammen, J. Who represents the users? Critical encounters between women’s health advocates and scientists in contraceptive R&D. In: Oudshoorn, N. & Pinch, R. (Ed.). How users matter: the co-construction of users and technology. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 2003. p. 151-71.

Meijers, A. (Ed.). Philosophy of technology and engineering sciences. Amsterdan: North-Holland/Elzevier. No prelo.

Michaels, D. Doubt is their product: how industry’s assault on science threatens your health. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

Oudshoorn, N. & Pinch, R. (Ed.). How users matter: the co-construction of users and technology. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 2003.

Radder, H. Science, technology and the science-technology relationship. In: Meijers, A. (Ed.). Philosophy of technology and engineering sciences. Amsterdan: North-Holland/Elzevier. No prelo. p. 71-87.

Simon, B. Undead science: science studies and the afterlife of cold fusion. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2002.

Downloads

Published

2009-03-01

Issue

Section

Artigos

How to Cite

Ciencia, tecnología y democracia: distinciones y conexiones. (2009). Scientiae Studia, 7(1), 63-81. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-31662009000100004