La filosofía trascendental y la interpretación de Bohr de la teoría cuántica

Authors

  • Hernán Pringe Universidad de Buenos Aires

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-31662012000100008

Keywords:

Kant, Bohr, Objectivity, Complementarity

Abstract

Kant's transcendental philosophy makes a distinction between the conditions of objectivity of knowledge and those of its systematic unity. In this article we aim to show that these two moments of scientific knowledge articulate Bohr´s interpretation of quantum theory. We shall see that the demand of objectivity of knowledge grounds the classical character of the description of quantum phenomena, while the demand of their systematic unity grounds the objectivity of quantum objects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bense, M. Quantenmechanik und Daseinsrelativität, Welsel-Druck, Köln-Kalk, 1938.

Bohr, N. Atomic theory and the description of nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1934.

Bohr, N. Causality and Complementarity. Philosophy of Science, 4, p. 289-98, 1937. In: Bohr, N. Discussion with Einstein on epistemological problems in atomic physics. In: Bohr, N. Atomic physics and human knowledge. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1958. p. 32-66).

Bohr, N. Mathematics and natural philosophy. Scientific Monthly, 82, p. 85-8, 1956.

Bohr, N. Atomic physics and human knowledge. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1958.

Bohr, N. Essays 1958 – 1962 on atomic physics and human knowledge. London: Wiley, 1963.

Bohr, N. Causality and complementarity. In: Faye, J. & Folse, H. (Ed.). The philosophical writings of Niels Bohr. Connecticut: Woodbridge, 1998 [1937]. v. 4, p. 83-91.

Cassirer, E. Die Kantischen Elemente in Wilhelm von Humboldts Sprachphilosophie. In: Orth, E. (Ed.). Geist und Leben. Reclam, Leipzig, 2003 [1923]. p. 236-73.

Falkenburg, B. Particle metaphysics. New York: Springer, 2007.

Favrholdt, D. Niels Bohr´s philosophical background. Historisk-filosofiske Meddeleser, 63. Copenhagen: The Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters, 1992.

Faye, J. Niels Bohr: his heritage and legacy. An anti-realist view of quantum mechanics. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1991.

Faye, J. & Folse, H. (Ed.). Causality and Complementarity. The philosophical writings of Niels Bohr. Connecticut: Woodbridge, 1998. v. 4.

Heisenberg, W. The physical principles of the quantum theory. Mineola: Dover, 1949.

Høffding, H. Historia de la filosofía moderna. Madrid: Jorro, 1907. 2 v.

Høffding, H. Der Menschliche Gedanke. Leipzig: Reisland, 1911.

Høffding, H. La relativité philosophique, Paris: Alcan, 1924.

Kant, I: Crítica de la razón pura. Estudio preliminar, traducción y notas M. Caimi. Buenos Aires: Colihue, 2007. (KrV).

Laurikainen, K. Beyond the atom. The philosophical thought of Wolfgang Pauli. Berlin: Springer, 1988.

Orth, E. (Ed.). Geist und Leben. Reclam, Leipzig, 2003.

Pringe, H. Critique of the quantum power of judgment. A transcendental foundation of quantum objectivity. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter, 2007.

Pringe, H. Kant and Bohr on symbolic knowledge in quantum theory. In: Rohden, V. et al (Ed.). Akten des X. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2008. p. 757-67.

Rohden, V. et al. (Ed.). Akten des X. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2008.

Rosenfeld, L. et al. (Ed.). Bohr’s collected works. Amsterdam/New York: North-Holland/American Elsevier, 1972. v. 6. (BCW).

Zöller, G. Theoretische Gegenstandbeziehung bei Kant, de Gruyter, Berlin, 1984.

Downloads

Published

2012-01-01

Issue

Section

Artigos

How to Cite

La filosofía trascendental y la interpretación de Bohr de la teoría cuántica. (2012). Scientiae Studia, 10(1), 179-194. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-31662012000100008