Os dinossauros de Hennig: sobre a importância do monofiletismo para a sistemática biológica
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-31662008000200003Keywords:
Cladistics, Cladogram, Darwin, Evolution, Hennig, Natural group, Phylogeny, Monophyly, SystematicsAbstract
Biological systematics is the branch of natural sciences that deals with nomenclature, description, and organization of biological diversity in hierarchical schemes. It has been developed since the human first efforts toward the summarization of biological information in order to group organisms in classes, and to identify, among them, which ones are natural entities. From Aristotle to Hennig, many forms of systematizing the biological knowledge have been proposed, with the intention of delimiting and representing the natural affinities among organisms. Even after Darwin-Wallace's theory, biological systematics presented few changes in its foundations until the works of the German entomologist Willi Hennig. He introduced a method that was as objective and explicit as phenetics, and deeply connected to the Darwinian evolutionary perspective. Hennigian phylogenetics aims to create a classificatory reference system which reflects evolution. In this sense, Hennig proposed that only monophyletic groups are natural ones, since they were the unique that really respects the evolutionary concept of common descent. A monophyletic group is defined as the reunion of all descendants of a common ancestor, including it. Based on the recognition of monophyletic (natural) groups, the phylogenetic systematics is a powerful tool to reconstruct the evolution of the organisms with objective and scientific criteria, helping to solve the problem of systematizing the biological information that has worried mankind since the dawn of language.Downloads
References
Benton, M. J. Diversification and extinction in the history of life. Science, 268, p. 52-8, 1995.
Bowler, P. Evolution: the history of an idea. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2003.
Brochu, C. A. Progress and future directions in archosaur phylogenetics. Journal of Paleontology, 75, p. 1185–201, 2001.
Brower, A. V. Z. et al. Gene trees, species trees and systematics: a cladistic perspective. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 27, p. 423–50, 1996.
Darwin, C. On the tendency of species to form varieties, and on the perpetuation of varieties and species by means of natural selection. Journal of the Proceedings of the Linnean Society (Zoology), 3, p. 45-62, 1858.
Darwin, C. On the origin of species by means of natural selection or the preservation of favored races in the struggle for life. London: Murray, 1859.
Dawkins, R. Universal darwinism. In: Hull, D. L. & Ruse, M. (Ed.). The philosophy of biology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998. p. 15-37.
Dawkins, R. O capelão do diabo. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2005.
Dingus, L. & Rowe, T. The mistaken extinction. Dinosaur evolution and the origin of birds. New York: W. H. Freeman & Co., 1998.
Ebach, M. C. & Williams, D. M. Congruence and language. Taxon, 53, p. 113-8, 2004.
Ebach, M. C. et al. Assumption 2: opaque to intuition? Journal of Biogeography, 32, p. 781-7, 2005.
Ehrlich, P. R. Systematics in 1970: some unpopular predictions. Systematic Zoology, 10, p. 157-8, 1961.
Faith, D. P. From species to supertrees: popperian corroboration and some current controversies in systematics. Australian Systematic Botany, 17, p. 1-16, 2004.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2008 Scientiae Studia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
A revista detém os direitos autorais de todos os textos nela publicados. Os autores estão autorizados a republicar seus textos mediante menção da publicação anterior na revista. A revista adota a Licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.