The polarization of “La Manada”: the public debate in Spain and the risks of digital political communication
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/0103-2070.ts.2019.159680Keywords:
Digital polarization, Online social networks, The pack, Twitter, Political communicationAbstract
Several authors have raised in recent years that the new scenario generated by digital communication causes citizens to have a role with greater prominence in the public debate. However, apart from the multiple political and communicative opportunities arising from the irruption of digital social networks, we find some risks and limitations relevant to political communication such as lack of civility (Incivility). The objective of this research is to analyze, through the study of the case of “La Manada” (of great social and political repercussion in Spain) and making use of Big data techniques, the possible polarization of public debate in the social network Twitter and the existence of this type of negative practices, especially when they affect women. We find a scenario of extreme polarization in which both parties tend to use the subject of debate as a pretext to reinforce the positions that separate the left and the right in Spain.
Downloads
References
Adamic, L. A. & Glance, N. (2005), “The political blogosphere and the 2004 us election: divided they blog”. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on Link discovery. Nova York, acm, pp. 36-43.
Benkler, Y. & Nissenbaum, H. (2006), “Commons‐based peer production and virtue”. Journal of Political Philosophy, 14 (4): 394-419.
Bennett, W. L. & Segerberg, A. (2013), The logic of connective action: digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Nova York, Cambridge University Press.
Borondo, J.; Morales, A. J.; Losada, J. C. & Benito, R. M. (2012), “Characterizing and modeling an electoral campaign in the context of Twitter: 2011 Spanish presidential election as a case study”. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 22 (2): 123-138.
Boxell, L.; Gentzkow, M. & Shapiro, J. M. (2017), Is the internet causing political polarization? Evidence from demographics. Washington, National Bureau of Economic Research.
Caldarelli, G.; Chessa, A.; Pammolli, F.; Pompa, G.; Puliga, M.; Riccaboni, M. & Riotta, G. (2014), “A multi-level geographical study of Italian political elections from Twitter data”. PloS One, 9 (5): 95-104. Disponible en https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095809.
Cárdenas, J. P.; Vidal, G.; Urbina, C.; Olivares, G.; Rodrigo, P. & Fuentes, M. (2018), “Research article social crises: signatures of complexity in a fast-growing economy”. Complexity, 1:11-22.
Castells, M. (2009), Comunicación y poder. Madrid, Alianza.
Citron, D. K. (2009), “Cyber civil rights”. Bul Rev., 89: 61-77.
Gentzkow, M. (2016), Polarization in 2016. Toulouse Network of Information Technology White Paper.
Gervais, B. T. (2015), “Incivility online: affective and behavioral reactions to uncivil political posts in a web-based experiment”. Journal of Information Technology y Politics, 12 (2): 167-185.
Gibson, R. & Ward, S. (2009), “Parties in the digital age, a review article”. Representation, 45 (1): 87-100.
Hague, B. & Loader, B. D. (1999), Digital democracy: discource and decision-making in the information age. Londres, Routledge.
Haidt, J. & Hetherington, M. J. (2012). “Look how far we’ve come apart”. The New York Times.
Herbst, S. (2010). Rude democracy: civility and incivility in American politics. Philadelphia, Temple University Press.
Jane, E. (2012). “‘Your a ugly, whorish, slut’: understanding e-bile”. Feminist Media Studies, 23: 115-128.
Lazarsfeld, P. F. & Merton R. K. (1954), “Friendship as a social process: a substantive and methodological analysis”. In: Berger, M.; Abel, T. & Page, C. H. (eds.). Freedom and control in modern society. Nova York, Octagon Books, pp. 18-66.
Lelkes, Y. (2016), “Mass polarization: manifestations and measurements”. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80 (S1): 392-410.
Lutz, C.; Hoffmann, C. P. & Meckel, M. (2014). “Beyond just politics: asystematic literature review of online participation”. First Monday, 19 (7): 1-36.
Martin-Gutierrez, S.; Losada, J. C. & Benito, R. M. (2018). “Recurrent patterns of user behavior in different electoral campaigns: a twitter analysis of the Spanish general elections of 2015 and 2016”. Complexity, 1: 35-48.
Megarry, J. (2014). “Online incivility or sexual harassment? Conceptualising women’s experiences in the digital age”. Women’s Studies International Forum, 47: 46-55.
Papacharissi, Z. (2004), “Democracy online: civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups”. New Media and Society, 6 (2): 259-283.
Park R. E. & Burgess E. W. (1921), Introduction to the Science of Sociology. Chicago, University Chicago Press.
Rains, S. A.; Kenski, K.; Coe, K. & Harwood, J. (2017), “Incivility and political identity on the internet: intergroup factors as predictors of incivility in discussions of news online”. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 22 (4): 163- 178.
Reingold, B. (2003), Representing women: sex, gender, and legislative behavior in Arizona and California. Los Angeles, University of North Carolina Press.
Robles, José Manuel; Velez, Daniel; De Marco, Stefano; Rodríguez, J. Tinguaro & Gomez, Daniel. (2018), “Affective homogeneity in the Spanish general election debate: a comparative analysis of social networks political agents”. Information, Communication & Society.
Rowe, I. (2015), “Civility 2.0: a comparative analysis of incivility in online political discussion”. Information, Communication & Society, 18 (2): 121-138.
Schradie, J. (2011), “The digital production gap: the digital divide and Web 2.0 Collide”. Poetics, 39 (2): 145-168.
Sobieraj, S. & Berry, J. M. (2011), “From incivility to outrage: political discourse in blogs, talk radio, and cable news”. Political Communication, 28 (1): 19-41.
Spender, D. (1995), Nattering on the net: women, power and cyberspace. North Melbourne, Spinifex Press.
Sunstein, C. (2017), #RepublicDivided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Surowiecki, J. (2004), The wisdom of crowds. Nova York, Anchor.
Vaccari, C., Valeriani, A., Barberá, P., Jost, J. T., Nagler, J., & Tucker, J. A. (2016). “Of echo chambers and contrarian clubs: exposure to political disagreement among German and Italian users of Twitter”. Social Media + Society, 2 (3): 35-48.
Van Haperen, S.; Nicholls, W. & Uitermark, J. (2018). “Building protest online: engagement with the digitally networked# not1more protest campaign on Twitter”. Social Movement Studies, 17 (4): 408-423.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Tempo Social
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
