Risk-based justification for a 10µg/kg Default Residue Limit to establish withdrawal periods for veterinary medicinal products lacking Maximum Residue Limits
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2026.246390Keywords:
Veterinary medical products, Withdrawal period, Brazilian legislation, Default limit, Consumer safetyAbstract
The ultimate objective of risk assessment is to establish a safe level of intake of residues of Pharmacologically Active Substances (PAS) present in foods of animal origin. Under a gold-standard assessment scenario, toxicological reference values used to establish Maximum Residue Limits (MRLs) and withdrawal periods are derived from complete toxicological data packages for the substance. However, situations may arise in which the available dataset for toxicological evaluation and subsequent determination of MRLs for PAS used in veterinary medicinal products (VMPs) is incomplete, thereby limiting the regulatory establishment of withdrawal periods. To address this limitation, the Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock (MAPA) established, through Article 2 of Ordinance N° 200 of January 22, 2021, the possibility of applying a Default Limit of 10 ppb (10 µg/kg) as a cut-off value in residue depletion curves in edible tissues and animal-derived products for the determination of withdrawal periods. This article demonstrates that the adopted value of 10 ppb is not arbitrary but is scientifically supported by the Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) concept, originally proposed by Cramer for the toxicological classification of chemical substances and incorporated into international risk assessment approaches, with references to the Codex Alimentarius and related regulatory frameworks. Dietary exposure estimations further demonstrate that a residual level of 10 ppb is scientifically justifiable and methodologically appropriate to ensure consumer safety regarding foods of animal origin, representing a conservative approach consistent with internationally accepted risk management principles.
Downloads
References
Brasil. Lei nº 9.782, de 26 de janeiro de 1999. Define o Sistema Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária, cria a Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária, e dá outras providências [Internet]. Diário Oficial da União; Brasília; 1999 Jan 27 [cited 2026 Mar 10]. Available from: https://www2.camara.leg.br/legin/fed/lei/1999/lei-9782-26-janeiro-1999-344896-publicacaooriginal-1-pl.html
Brasil. Decreto nº 5.053, de 22 de abril de 2004. Aprova o Regulamento de Fiscalização de Produtos de Uso Veterinário e dos Estabelecimentos que os fabriquem ou comerciem [Internet]. Diário Oficial da União; Brasília; 2004 Abr 23 [cited 2026 Mar 10]. Available from: https://www.gov.br/agricultura/pt-br/assuntos/insumos-agropecuarios/insumospecuarios/produtos-veterinarios/legislacao-1/decreto-leie-lei/decreto-federal-no-5053-de-22-04-2004.pdf/view
Brasil. Decreto nº 9.013, de 29 de março de 2017. Regulamenta a Lei nº 1.283/1950 e a Lei nº 7.889/1989, que dispõem sobre a inspeção industrial e sanitária de produtos de origem animal (RIISPOA) [Internet]. Diário Oficial da União; Brasília; 2017 Mar 30 [cited 2026 Mar 10]. Available from: https://legislacao.presidencia.gov.br/atos/?tipo=DEC&numero=9013&ano=2017&ato=4edkXWU9EeZpWT3a4
Brasil. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. Portaria nº 200, de 14 de junho de 2021. Estabelece critérios para determinação de períodos de carência de medicamentos veterinários. Diário Oficial da União; 2021 Jun 14.
Brasil. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária . Resolução RDC nº 730, de 6 de julho de 2022. Dispõe sobre a avaliação do risco à saúde humana de medicamentos veterinários, os limites máximos de resíduos (LMR) e os métodos de análise para fins de avaliação da conformidade [Internet]. Diário Oficial da União; Brasília; 2022a Jul 6 [cited 2026 Mar 10]. Available from: https://anvisalegis.datalegis.net/action/ActionDatalegis.php?acao=abrirTextoAto&link=S&tipo=RDC&numeroAto=00000730&seqAto=002&valorAno=2022&orgao=RDC/DC/ANVISA/MS&cod_modulo=310&cod_menu=9431
Brasil. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Instrução Normativa nº 162, de 1º de julho de 2022. Estabelece os limites máximos de resíduos (LMR), as ingestões diárias aceitáveis (IDA) e as doses de referência aguda (ARfD) de medicamentos veterinários em alimentos de origem animal [Internet]. Diário Oficial da União; Brasília; 2022b Jul 6 [cited 2026 Mar 10]. Available from: https://anvisalegis.datalegis.net/action/ActionDatalegis.php?acao=abrirTextoAto&tipo=INM&numeroAto=00000162&seqAto=000&valorAno=2022&orgao=ANVISA/MS&codTipo=&desItem=&desItemFim=&cod_menu=9434&cod_modulo=310&pesquisa=true
Boobis A, Brown P, Cronin MTD, Edwards J, Galli CL, Goodman J, Jacobs A, Kirkland D, Luijten M, Marsaux C, Martin M, Yang C, Hollnagel HM. Origin of the TTC values for compounds that are genotoxic and/or carcinogenic and an approach for their re-evaluation. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2017;47(8):710-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408444.201 7.1318822. PMid:28510487.
Cheeseman MA, Machuga EJ, Bailey AB. A tiered approach to threshold of regulation. Food Chem Toxicol. 1999;37(4): 387-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-6915(99)00024-1. PMid:10418955.
Cramer GM, Ford RA, Hall RL. Estimation of toxic hazard: a decision tree approach. Food Cosmet Toxicol. 1978;16(3): 255-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-6264(76)80522-6. PMid:357272.
European Food Safety Authority. Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain. Scientific opinion on exploring options for providing advice about possible human health risks based on the concept of threshold of toxicological concern (TTC). EFSA J. 2012;10(7):2750. PMid:42016077.
European Food Safety Authority. World Health Organization – WHO. EN-1006: review of the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) approach and development of new TTC decision tree. Parma; 2016a.
European Food Safety Authority. World Health Organization – WHO. EN-1000: outcome of a public consultation on the conclusions and recommendations of the EFSA-WHO workshop on the TTC approach. Parma; 2016b.
European Food Safety Authority. World Health Organization – WHO. Guidance on the use of the threshold of toxicological concern approach in food safety assessment. EFSA J. 2019;17(6):5708.
European Medicines Agency. Guidance on the assessment of genotoxicity of herbal substances/preparations. London: EMA; 2012.
European Union. Commission Decision of 23 January 2002 amending Decision 1999/217/EC as regards the register of flavoring substances used in or on foodstuffs. Official Journal of the European Union; Luxembourg; 2002, L48:1-160.
European Union. Guidance document on the assessment of the relevance of metabolites in groundwater of substances regulated under Council Directive 91/414/EEC. Brussels: European Commission; 2003.
European Union. Regulation (EC) No 470/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 laying down Community procedures for the establishment of residue limits of pharmacologically active substances in foodstuffs of animal origin. Official Journal of the European Union; Luxembourg; 2009, L152:11-22.
European Union. Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/1871 of 7 November 2019 on reference points for action for nonallowed pharmacologically active substances present in food of animal origin. Official Journal of the European Union; Luxembourg; 2019. L289:41-6.
Food and Agriculture Organization; World Health Organization. Principles and methods for the risk assessment of chemicals in food. Geneva: WHO; 2009a. Chapter 2, Risk assessment and its role in risk analysis. (Environmental Health Criteria; no. 240).
Food and Agriculture Organization; World Health Organization . Principles and methods for the risk assessment of chemicals in food. Geneva: WHO; 2009b. Chapter 6, Dietary exposure assessment of chemicals in food. (Environmental Health Criteria; no. 240).
Food and Agriculture Organization; World Health Organization . Principles and methods for the risk assessment of chemicals in food. Geneva: WHO; 2009c. Chapter 8, Maximum residue limits for pesticides and veterinary drugs. (Environmental Health Criteria; no. 240).
Food and Agriculture Organization; World Health Organization. Principles and methods for the risk assessment of chemicals in food. Geneva: WHO; 2009d. Chapter 9, Principles related to specific groups of substances. (Environmental Health Criteria; no. 240).
Food and Agriculture Organization; World Health Organization. Principles and methods for the risk assessment of chemicals in food. Geneva: WHO; 2009e. Chapter 7, Risk characterization. (Environmental Health Criteria; no. 240).
Food and Agriculture Organization; World Health Organization. Codex alimentarius commission procedural manual. Geneva: WHO; 2024.
Food and Drug Administration (US). Food additives: threshold of regulation for substances used in food-contact articles. Fed Regist. 1995;60:36582-96.
Food and Drug Administration (US). Toxicological principles for the safety assessment of direct food additives and color additives used in food. Fed Regist. 1993;58:16536-63.
Frawley JP. Specific evidence and common sense as a basis for food-packing regulations. Food Cosmet Toxicol. 1967;5(3): 293-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-6264(67)83055-4. PMid:4861454.
Gold LS, Sawyer CB, Magaw R, Backman GM, de Veciana M, Levinson R, Hooper NK, Havender WR, Bernstein L, Peto R, Pike MC, Ames BN. A carcinogenic potency database of the standardized results of animal bioassays. Environ Health Perspect. 1984;58:9-319. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.84589. PMid:6525996.
Gold LS, Manley NB, Slone TH, Rohrbach L. Supplement to the carcinogenic potency database (CPDB). Environ Health Perspect. 1999;107(Suppl 4):527-600. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.99107s4527. PMid:10421768.
International Council for Harmonisation. Assessment and control of DNA-reactive (mutagenic) impurities in pharmaceuticals to limit potential carcinogenic risk (M7). Geneva: ICH; 2014.
Kroes R, Kleiner J, Renwick A. The threshold of toxicological concern concept in risk assessment. Toxicol Sci. 2000;57: 195-8. PMid:15829616.
Kroes R, Renwick AG, Cheeseman M, Kleiner J, Mangelsdorf I, Piersma A, Schilter B, Schlatter J, van Schothorst F, Vos JG, Würtzen G. Structure-based thresholds of toxicological concern (TTC). Food Chem Toxicol. 2004;42(1):65-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2003.08.006. PMid:14630131.
Munro IC. Safety assessment procedures for indirect food additives: an overview. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1990;12(1): 2-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-2300(05)80042-X. PMid:2217916.
Munro IC, Ford RA, Kennepohl E, Sprenger JG. Correlation of structural class with no-observed-effect levels. Food Chem Toxicol. 1996;34(9):829-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-6915(96)00049-X. PMid:8972878.
Munro IC, Kennepohl E, Kroes R. A procedure for the safety evaluation of flavouring substances. Food Chem Toxicol. 1999;37(2-3):207-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-6915(98)00112-4. PMid:10227744.
Munro IC, Renwick AG, Danielewska-Nikiel B. The threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) in risk assessment. Toxicol Lett. 2008;180(2):151-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2008.05.006. PMid:18573621.
Ramsey LL. The food additive problem of plastics used in food packing. In: Proceedings of the National Technical Conference of the Society of Plastics Engineers; 1969 Nov 4-6. Danbury: Society of Plastics Engineers; 1969.
United States. Code of Federal Regulations. Title 21, §170.39—Threshold of regulation for substances used in food-contact articles [Internet]. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Publishing Office; 2024 [cited 2026 Mar 10]. Available from: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-B/part-170/subpart-B/section-170.39
World Health Organization. Safety evaluation of certain food additives. Geneva: WHO; 1999. (WHO Food Additives Series; no. 42).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The journal content is authorized under the Creative Commons BY-NC-SA license (summary of the license: https://