Participatory budgeting and municipal spending: a matching methods analysis for causal inference
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/1980-5330/ea216901Keywords:
participatory budgeting, matching methods, panel dataAbstract
The purpose is to evaluate the impact of participatory budgeting (PB) on the composition of public spending in Brazilian municipalities. We employ the matching methods for causal inference with panel data, which allows us to deal with issues previously ignored. First, the fact that there is high variability in the timing of treatment between municipalities. Second, the fact that several municipalities abandon or resume the PB at some point. Our results indicate that the adoption of the PB had the effect of redirecting a portion of public spending to the categories of “Health and Sanitation” and “Housing and Urban Planning”.
Downloads
References
ABERS, R. Fromclientelism to cooperation: local government, participatory policy, and civic organizing in Porto Alegre, Brazil. Politics & Society, v. 26, n. 4, p. 511–537, 1998.
AZEVEDO, R. R. et al. Efeitos políticos na descontinuidade do orçamento participativo em municípios. Revista de Administração Pública, v. 56, n. 3, p. 349–372, 2022.
BEUERMANN, D.W.; AMELINA, M. Does participatory budgeting improve decentralized public service delivery? Washington, DC, 2014.
BORUSYAK, K.; JARAVEL, X. Revisiting event-study designs: robust and eficiente estimation. The Review of Economic Studies, v. 91, n. 6, p. 3253–3285, 2024.
BOULDING, C.; WAMPLER, B. Voice, votes, and resources: evaluating the effect of participatory democracy on well-being. World Development, v. 38, p. 125–135, 2010.
CALABRESE, T.; WILLIAMS, D.; GUPTA, A.Does participatory budgeting alter public spending? Evidence from New York City. Administration & Society, v. 52, n. 9, p. 1382–1409, 2020.
CALLAWAY, B.; SANT’ANNA, P. H. C. Difference-in-differences with multiple time periods. Journal of Econometrics, v. 225, n. 2, p. 200–230, 2021.
DE CHAISEMARTIN, C.; D’HAULTFOEUILLE, X. Two-way fixed effects estimators with heterogeneous treatment effects. American Economic Review, v. 110, n. 9, p. 2964–2996, 2020.
FOSTER, A. D.; ROSENZWEIG, M. R. Democratization, decentralization and the distribution of local public goods in a poor rural economy. Amsterdam, 2001.
GONÇALVES, S. The effects of participatory budgeting on municipal expenditures and infant mortality in Brazil. World Development, v. 53, p. 94–110, 2014.
GONZALES-NAVARRO, M.; QUINTANA-DOMEQUE, C. On the returns to infrastructure for the urban poor and politicians: evidence from a street pavement experiment. Unpublished Manuscript. [S. l.], 2012.
GOODMAN-BACON, A. Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing. Journal of Econometrics, v. 225, n. 2, p. 254–277, 2021.
GOVINDASAMY, P. A comparison between propensity score matching, weighting, and stratification in multiple treatment groups: A simulation study. 2016. Tese (Doutorado) – University of Denver, Denver, CO.
GRILLOS, T. Participatory budgeting and the poor: tracing bias in amulti-staged process in Solo, Indonesia. World Development, v. 96, n. 100, p. 343–358, 2017.
HAM, D. W.; MIRATRIX, L. Benefits and costs of matching prior to a difference in differences analysis when parallel trends does not hold. [S. l.], 2022.
IMAI, K.; KIM, I. S. On the use of two-way fixed effects regression models for causal inference with panel data. Political Analysis, v. 29, n. 3, p. 405–415, 2021.
IMAI, K.; KIM, I. S.; WANG, E. H. Matching methods for causal inference with time-series cross-sectional data. American Journal of Political Science, v. 67, n. 3, p. 587–605, 2021.
IMAI, K.; RATKOVIC, M. Covariate balancing propensity score. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), v. 76, n. 1, p. 243–263, 2014.
JARAMILLO, M.; ALCÁZAR, L. Does participatory budgeting have an effect on the quality of public services? The case of Peru’s water and sanitation sector. In: PERRY, G.; NAQVI, R. A. (ed.). Improving access and quality of public services in Latin America: to govern and to serve. New York, NY: PalgraveMacmillan, 2017. p. 105–136.
KANG, J. D. Y.; SCHAFER, J. L. Demystifying double robustness: a comparison of alternative strategies for estimating a population mean from incomplete data. Statistical Science, v. 22, n. 4, p. 523–539, 2007.
KEEFER, P. Clientelism, credibility, and the policy choices of young democracies. American Journal of Political Science, v. 51, n. 4, p. 804–821, 2007.
LIMA, R. M. C. Experiências de orçamento participativo no Brasil–período de 1997 a 2000. Revista Brasileira de Estudos Urbanos e Regionais, v. 4, n. 1/2, p. 147–148, 2002.
MARQUETTI, A.; SILVA, C. E. S.; CAMPBELL, A. Participatory economic democracy in action: participatory budgeting in Porto Alegre, 1989-2004. Review of Radical Political Economics, v. 44, n. 1, p. 62–81, 2012. Disponível em: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0486613411418055. Acesso em: 30 set. 2026.
MARTINEZ-VASQUEZ, J.; LAGO-PENÃS, S.; SACCHI, A. The impact of fiscal decentralization: a survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, v. 31, n. 4, p. 1095–1129, 2016.
MCKERCHAR, M.; BLOOMQUIST, K.; POPE, J. Indicators of tax morale: an exploratory study. eJournal of Tax Research, v. 11, n. 1, p. 5–22, 2013.
MOBARAK, A. M.; RAJKUMAR, A. S.; CROPPER, M. The political economy of health services provision in Brazil. Economic Development and Cultural Change, v. 59, n. 4, p. 723–751, 2011.
MOHTADI, H.; ROE, T. L. Democracy, rent seeking, public spending and growth. Journal of Public Economics, v. 87, n. 3-4, p. 445–466, 2003.
SCHNEIDER, S. H.; BUSSE, S. Participatory budgeting in Germany–A review of empirical findings. International Journal of Public Administration, v. 42, n. 3, p. 259–273, 2019.
SHAH, A. Participatory Budgeting. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2007.
SHYBALKINA, J.; BIFULCO, R. Does participatory budgeting change the share of public funding to low income neighborhoods. Public Budgeting & Finance, v. 39, n. 1, p. 45–66, 2019.
SILVER, I. A. et al. Longitudinal propensity score matching: A demonstration of counterfactual conditions adjusted for longitudinal clustering. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, v. 37, n. 1, p. 267–301, 2021.
SINTOMER, Y.; HERZBERG, C.; RÖCKE, A. Participatory budgeting in Europe: potentials and challenges. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, v. 32, n. 1, p. 164–178, 2008.
SMITH, J. A.; TODD, P. E. Does matching overcome LaLonde’s critique of nonexperimental estimators? Journal of Econometrics, v. 125, n. 1-2, p. 305–353, 2005.
SPADA, P. Dataset on Brazilian Participatory Budgeting: 1989 to 2012. [S. l.]: Harvard Dataverse, 2017.
SPADA, P. The political and economic effects of Brazilian participatory budgeting. In: JACQUET, V.; RYAN, M.; VAN DER DOES, R. (ed.). The Impacts of Democratic Innovations. Colchester: ECPR Press, 2023. p. 209–231.
SPADA, P. et al. Variety of Brazilian participatory budgeting designs: 2012. [S. l.: s. n.], 2012.
SPADA, P. et al. Variety of Brazilian participatory budgeting designs: 2016. [S. l.: s. n.], 2016.
STONE, C. A.; TANG, Y. Comparing propensity score methods in balancing covariates and recovering impact in small sample educational program evaluations. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, v. 18, n. 1, p. 13, 2013.
STUART, E. A. Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward. Statistical Science: a Review Journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics, v. 25, n. 1, p. 1–21, 2010.
SUN, L.; ABRAHAM, S. Estimating dynamic treatment effects in event studies with heterogeneous treatment effects. Journal of Econometrics, v. 225, n. 2, p. 175–199, 2020.
TORGLER, B. Beyond punishment: a tax compliance experiment with taxpayers in Costa Rica. Revista de Análisis Económico, v. 18, n. 1, p. 27–56, 2003.
TOUCHTON, M.; WAMPLER, B. Improving social well-being through new democratic institutions. Comparative Political Studies, v. 47, n. 10, p. 1442–1469, 2014.
TOUCHTON, M.; WAMPLER, B.; PEIXOTO, T. Of governance and revenue: participatory institutions and tax compliance in Brazil.Washington, DC, 2019.
UNITED NATIONS. Urbanization. New York, NY: United Nations Development Programme, 2011.
WAMPLER, B.; AVRITZER, L. The expansion of participatory budgeting in Brazil: na analysis of the successful cases based upon design and socio-economic indicators. Washington, DC, 2008.
WAMPLER, B.; MCNULTY, S.; TOUCHTON, M. Participatory budgeting: spreading across the globe. [S. l.], 2018. Disponível em: https://old.transparency-initiative.org/participatory-budgeting-spreading-across-globe-report/. Acesso em: 30 set. 2026.
WAMPLER, B.; TOUCHTON, M. Participatory budgeting: adoption and transformation. Brighton, 2017.
WORLD BANK. Brazil: toward a more inclusive and effective participatory budget in Porto Alegre. Washington, DC, 2008.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Economia Aplicada
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
