Icon and cognition: pure icon, perceptual icons, and hypoicons

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1980-4016.esse.2025.238723

Keywords:

Icon, Hybrid icons, Hypoicon, Perception, Cognition

Abstract

Unfortunately, the graduated variations of C. S. Peirce's concept of icon have been very little explored. Frequently, the concept is reduced to its simplest and most limited version, restricted to its position within the triad of icon, index, and symbol, even neglecting the elementary fact that the icon refers only to the relationship of the sign with its object of possible reference, and that this could be more productively understood when considering that, to be an icon, the sign can only be in itself a quali-sign and, in relation to the interpretant, a rheme. Moreover, hybrid forms of the icon with the classes of signs relating to secondness and thirdness are not usually explored. As if that weren't enough, the habit is to treat the icon in its aspect as a hypoicon, ignoring other possible variations of iconicity. Given these gaps, this text aims to analytically present the many possibilities of the semiotic functioning of the icon.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Lucia Santaella, Pontifical Catholic University of São Paulo

    Professora titular do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Comunicação e Semiótica da Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP), São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

References

BERNSTEIN, Richard J. Peirce's theory of perception. In: MOORE, Edward C.; ROBIN, Richard S. (eds.). Studies in the philosophy of Charles Sanders Peirce. Amherst: The University of Massachusetts Press, 1964. p. 165-189.

BORGES, Jorge Luis. El hacedor. Buenos Aires: Emecé, 1971.

HAUSMAN, Carl R. In and out of Peirce's percept. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, v. 26, n. 3, p. 271-308, 1990.

PEIRCE, Charles Sanders. Collected Papers. In: HARTSHORNE, Charles; WEISS, Arthur W. (eds.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1931-1958. [Citado como CP seguido pelo n. do volume]

RANSDELL, Joseph. Charles Peirce. The idea of representation. Tese de doutoramento, inédita. New York: Columbia University, 1966.

ROSENTHAL, Sandra. Beyond foundationalism and anti-foundationalism: Peirce’s pragmatic path. Face, v. 4, n. 1, p. 11-29, 1992.

ROSENTHAL, Sandra. Peirce's theory of perceptual judgement: An ambiguity. Journal of History of Philosophy, v. 7, n. 3, p. 303-314, 1969.

SANTAELLA, Lucia. A teoria geral dos signos. Semiose e autogeração. São Paulo: Pioneira, 1995.

SANTAELLA, Lucia. From pure icon to metaphor: Six degrees of iconicity. In: COLAPIETRO, Vincent; OLSHEWSKY, Thomas M. (eds.). Peirce's doctrine of signs. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1996. p. 252-262.

SANTAELLA, Lucia. Matrizes da linguagem e pensamento: sonora, visual, verbal. São Paulo: Fapesp/Iluminuras, 2001. p. 105-111.

SANTAELLA, Lucia; NÖTH, Winfried. Imagem. Cognição, semiótica, mídia. São Paulo: Iluminuras, 1998. p. 59-73.

SANTAELLA, Lucia. O método anticartesiano de C. S. Peirce. São Paulo: Unesp, 2004.

SANTAELLA, Lucia. Percepção. Fenomenologia, ecologia, semiótica. São Paulo: Cengage, 2012.

SAVAN, David. An introduction to C. S. Peirce’s full system of semiotic. The Victoria College of the University of Toronto (Monograph series of the Toronto Semiotic Circle 1), 1976.

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

Santaella, L. (2025). Icon and cognition: pure icon, perceptual icons, and hypoicons. Estudos Semióticos, 21(3), 01-21. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1980-4016.esse.2025.238723