Deux versions du modèle dans le Timée
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1981-9471.v9i1p1-21Keywords:
Platon, Timée, Modèle, Ancient Philosophy, demiurgeAbstract
The purpose of this article is to emphasize two alternatives introduced by Plato in the Timaeus in order to describe the model. In her argumentation developed in Nature and Divinity in Plato's Timaeus, S. Broadie affirms that a metaphysical reading of the Timaeus should be rejected in favor of a cosmological interpretation. To justify this idea, Broadie distinguishes between two ways of understanding what could be the model at which the demiurge looks in order to shape the cosmos, namely an original or a plan. According to Broadie, since it is the second alternative that is present in the Timaeus, and since this alternative is closely related to a cosmological interpretation of the dialogue, then it would be a mistake to offer a metaphysical reading of Timaeus’ discourse. However, as we shall see, the Timaeus associates the model not only with a plan but also with an original, which suggests that the cosmological reading of this dialogue should be connected with a metaphysical interpretation. Far from leading to a contradiction, the fact that Plato offers two versions of the model could mean that the question of the nature of Forms is not completely absent from the dialogue. In providing a double description of the model, and in offering metaphysical considerations within his cosmological discourse, Plato seems to provide an account of the nature of the intelligible and its explanatory role with regards to an understanding of what is the universe in all its complexity, for the two versions will allow to justify 1) the nature of cosmos as the best possible realization and 2) the ontological status of the sensible which possesses its own degree of being. Are these two versions fully compatible? We will suggest in our conclusion that the tension induced by their presence in the same dialogue actually allows a better understanding of Timaeus’ speech.
Downloads
References
Brisson, L. (2001). Timée, Critias. Paris: GF Flammarion.
Broadie, S. (2011). Nature and Divinity in Plato's Timaeus. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511997815
Bury, R. G. (1966). Plato: Timaeus, Critias, Cleitophon, Menexenus and Epistles. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Cherniss, H. (1977). A Much Misread Passage of the Timaeus (Timaeus 49c7-50b5). In H. Cherniss & L. Tarán (Eds.), Selected Papers (pp. 346–363). Leiden: Brill. (first published in 1954; DOI: 10.2307/292030)
Cornford, F. M. (1997). Plato's Cosmology: The Timaeus of Plato / translated, with a running commentary by Francis MacDonald Cornford. Indianapolis, Ind: Hackett Pub. Co.
Frede, D. (1996). The Philosophical Economy of Plato's Psychology: Rationality and Common Concepts in the Timaeus. In M. Frede & G. Striker (Eds.), Rationality in Greek thought (pp. 29–58). New York: Oxford University Press.
Lee, E. N. (1966). On the Metaphysics of the Image in Plato's Timaeus. The Monist, 50, 341–368. DOI: 10.5840/monist196650326
Lee, E. N. (1967). On Plato's Timaeus 49c7-50b5. Apeiron, 2(1), 1–11.
Morrow, G. R. (1950). Necessity and Persuasion in Plato's Timaeus. The Philosophical Review, 59(2), 147–163.
Pradeau J.F., & Fronterotta F. (2005). Hippias majeur: Suivi de Hippias mineur. Paris: GF Flammarion.
O'Meara, D. (2012). Who is the Demiurge in Plato's Timaeus? Horizons, 3(1), 3–18.
Rivaud, A. (1956). Timée ; Critias (3rd ed.). Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Santas, G. X. (2006). The Blackwell Guide to Plato's Republic. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub. DOI: 10.1002/9780470776414.fmatter
Sedley, D. N. (2007). Creationism and its Critics in Antiquity. The Joan Palevsky imprint in classical literature: Vol. 66. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI: 10.1525/california/9780520253643.003.0007
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC By 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).