Deux versions du modèle dans le Timée
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1981-9471.v9i1p1-21Palavras-chave:
Platon, Timée, Modèle, Ancient Philosophy, demiurgeResumo
The purpose of this article is to emphasize two alternatives introduced by Plato in the Timaeus in order to describe the model. In her argumentation developed in Nature and Divinity in Plato's Timaeus, S. Broadie affirms that a metaphysical reading of the Timaeus should be rejected in favor of a cosmological interpretation. To justify this idea, Broadie distinguishes between two ways of understanding what could be the model at which the demiurge looks in order to shape the cosmos, namely an original or a plan. According to Broadie, since it is the second alternative that is present in the Timaeus, and since this alternative is closely related to a cosmological interpretation of the dialogue, then it would be a mistake to offer a metaphysical reading of Timaeus’ discourse. However, as we shall see, the Timaeus associates the model not only with a plan but also with an original, which suggests that the cosmological reading of this dialogue should be connected with a metaphysical interpretation. Far from leading to a contradiction, the fact that Plato offers two versions of the model could mean that the question of the nature of Forms is not completely absent from the dialogue. In providing a double description of the model, and in offering metaphysical considerations within his cosmological discourse, Plato seems to provide an account of the nature of the intelligible and its explanatory role with regards to an understanding of what is the universe in all its complexity, for the two versions will allow to justify 1) the nature of cosmos as the best possible realization and 2) the ontological status of the sensible which possesses its own degree of being. Are these two versions fully compatible? We will suggest in our conclusion that the tension induced by their presence in the same dialogue actually allows a better understanding of Timaeus’ speech.
Downloads
Referências
Brisson, L. (2001). Timée, Critias. Paris: GF Flammarion.
Broadie, S. (2011). Nature and Divinity in Plato's Timaeus. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511997815
Bury, R. G. (1966). Plato: Timaeus, Critias, Cleitophon, Menexenus and Epistles. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Cherniss, H. (1977). A Much Misread Passage of the Timaeus (Timaeus 49c7-50b5). In H. Cherniss & L. Tarán (Eds.), Selected Papers (pp. 346–363). Leiden: Brill. (first published in 1954; DOI: 10.2307/292030)
Cornford, F. M. (1997). Plato's Cosmology: The Timaeus of Plato / translated, with a running commentary by Francis MacDonald Cornford. Indianapolis, Ind: Hackett Pub. Co.
Frede, D. (1996). The Philosophical Economy of Plato's Psychology: Rationality and Common Concepts in the Timaeus. In M. Frede & G. Striker (Eds.), Rationality in Greek thought (pp. 29–58). New York: Oxford University Press.
Lee, E. N. (1966). On the Metaphysics of the Image in Plato's Timaeus. The Monist, 50, 341–368. DOI: 10.5840/monist196650326
Lee, E. N. (1967). On Plato's Timaeus 49c7-50b5. Apeiron, 2(1), 1–11.
Morrow, G. R. (1950). Necessity and Persuasion in Plato's Timaeus. The Philosophical Review, 59(2), 147–163.
Pradeau J.F., & Fronterotta F. (2005). Hippias majeur: Suivi de Hippias mineur. Paris: GF Flammarion.
O'Meara, D. (2012). Who is the Demiurge in Plato's Timaeus? Horizons, 3(1), 3–18.
Rivaud, A. (1956). Timée ; Critias (3rd ed.). Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Santas, G. X. (2006). The Blackwell Guide to Plato's Republic. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub. DOI: 10.1002/9780470776414.fmatter
Sedley, D. N. (2007). Creationism and its Critics in Antiquity. The Joan Palevsky imprint in classical literature: Vol. 66. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI: 10.1525/california/9780520253643.003.0007
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:- Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution (CC 4.0) que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).