Sensory evaluation tools stroke described in Portuguese: a systematic review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.590/1809-2950/13120122042015Abstract
Most survivors of stroke present, among other consequences, a sensory deficit. To assess the impact of this deficit on the activity and the effect of sensory reeducation protocols, it is important to use objective instruments. The objective of this systematic review was to analyze which sensory evaluation tools for post-stroke patients are available in Brazilian Portuguese and describe its features and/or properties. A search was conducted in the electronic databases SCIELO, LILACS, PUBMED, CINAHL, MEDLINE via OVDI, and EMBASE. The relevant studies were analyzed as to accessibility, objectivity of the score and measurement properties, adding articles through manual search when necessary. The search resulted in 96 studies, reduced to five eligible ones. A study was added through the list of references and the manual search was used for complementation. Among the seven reviewed articles, only three sensory evaluation tools are available in Portuguese: moving touch pressure (MTP), sensitivity domain of Fugl-Meyer Scale (FMS), and Nottingham Sensory Assessment (NSA). In addition, although the reliability of the FMS and of the NSA may be considered appropriate, the other properties of measurement need to be evaluated in future studies.Downloads
References
Garritano CR, Luz PM, Pires MLE, Barbosa MTS, Batista
KM. Análise da tendência da mortalidade por acidente
vascular cerebral no Brasil no século XXI. Arq Bras Cardiol.
;98(6):519-27.
Minelli C, Fen LF, Minelli DP. Stroke incidence, prognosis,
-day, and 1-year case fatality rates in Matao,
Brazil: a population-based prospective study. Stroke.
;38(11):2906-11.
Connell LA, Lincoln NB, Radford KA. Somatosensory
impairment after stroke: frequency of different deficits and
their recovery. Clin Rehabil. 2008;22(8):758.
Tyson SF, Hanley M, Chillala J, Selley AB, Tallis RC.
Sensory loss in hospital-admitted people with
stroke: characteristics, associated factors, and
relationship with function. Neurorehabil Neural Repair.
;22(2):166-72.
Kim JS, Choi-Kwon S. Discriminative sensory dysfunction
after unilateral stroke. Stroke. 1996;27(4):677-82.
Scalha TB, Miyasaki E, Lima NMFV, Borges G. Correlations
between motor and sensory functions in upper limb
chronic hemiparetics after stroke. Arq Neuropsiquiatr.
;69(4):624-9.
Carey LM. Somatosensory loss after stroke. Crit Rev Phys
Rehabil Med. 1995;7(1):51-91.
Reding MJ, Potes E. Rehabilitation outcome following initial
unilateral hemispheric stroke. Stroke. 1988;19(11):1354-8.
Han L, Law-gibson D, Reding M. Key neurological
impairments influence function-related group outcomes
after stroke. Stroke. 2002;33:1920-4.
Sommerfeld DM, von Arbin MH. The impact of
somatosensory function on activity performance and
length of hospital stay in geriatric patients with stroke. Clin
Rehabil. 2004;18(2):149-55.
Sullivan JE, Hedman LD. Sensory dysfunction following
stroke: incidence, significance, examination, and
intervention. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2008;15(3):200-17.
Wagner JM, Lang CE, Sahrmann SA, Hu Q, Bastian AJ,
Edwards DF, et al. Relationships between Sensorimotor
Impairments and Reaching Deficits in Acute Hemiparesis.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2006;20(3):406-16.
Lin SI. Motor function and joint position sense in relation to
gait performance in chronic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med
Rehabil. 2005;86(2):197-203.
Lin PY, Yang YR, Cheng SJ, Wang RY. The relation between
ankle impairments and gait velocity and symmetry in people
with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(4):562-8.
Lee MJ, Kilbreath SL, Refshauge KM. Movement detection
at the ankle following stroke is poor. Aust J Physiother.
;51(1):19-24.
Winward CE, Halligan PW, Wade DT. Current practice and
clinical relevance of somatosensory assessment after stroke.
Clin Rehabil. 1999;13(1):48-55.
Connell LA, Tyson SF. Measures of sensation in
neurological conditions: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil.
;26(1):68-80.
Dannenbaum RM, Michaelsen SM, Desrosiers J, Levin
MF. Development and validation of the two new sensory
tests of the hand for patients with stroke. Clin Rehabil.
;16(6):630-9.
Lima DHF, Queiroz AP, Salvo G, Yoneyama SM, Oberg TD,
Lima NMFV. Versão brasileira da Avaliação Sensorial de
Nottingham: validade, concordância e confiabilidade. Rev
Bras Fisioter. 2010;14(2):166-74.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and
meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med.
;151(4):264-9.
Terwee CB, Bot SDB, Boer MR, Van Der Windt DAWM, Knol DL,
Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement
properties of health status. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34-42.
Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW,
Knol DJ, et al. COSMIN checklist manual. 2012. Disponível
em: www.cosmin.nl
Brasil-Neto JP, Lima AC. Sensory Deficits in the unaffected
hand of hemiparetic stroke pacients. Cog Behav Neurol.
;21(4):202-5.
Faria-Fortini I, Michaelsen SM, Cassiano JG, TeixeiraSalmela LF. Upper Extremity Function in Stroke Subjects:
Relationships between the International Classification of
Functioning, Disability, and Health Domains. J Hand Ther.
;24(3):257-65.
Michaelsen SM, Rocha AS, Knabben RJ, Rodrigues LP,
Fernandes CGC. Translation, adaptation and inter-rater
reliability of the administration manual of Fugl-Meyer
assessment/Tradução, adaptação e confiabilidade
interexaminadores do manual de administração da escala
de Fugl-Meyer. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2011;15(1):80-8.
Faria I. Estudo da função do membro superior em
hemiplégicos crônicos [dissertação − mestrado em Ciências
da Reabilitação]. Belo Horizonte: Universidade Federal de
Minas Gerais. Escola de Educação Física, Fisioterapia e
Terapia Ocupacional, 2008.
Maki T, Quagliato EMAB, Cacho EWA, Paz LPS, Nascimento
NH, Inoue MMEA, et al. Estudo de confiabilidade da Escala de
Fugl-Meyer no Brasil. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2006;10(2):177-83.
Connell LA. Sensory impairment and recovery after stroke
[tese]. Nottingham: Universidade de Nottingham, 2007.
Disponível em: http://etheses.nottingham.ac.uk/247/1/
PHD_final.pdf
Lincoln NB, Crow JL, Jackson JM, Waters GR, Adams SA,
Hodgson P. The unreliability of sensory assessments. Clin
Rehabil. 1991;5:273-82.
Lincoln NB, Jackson JM, Adams SA. Reliability and revision
of the Nottingham sensory assessment for stroke patients.
Physiotherapy. 1998;84(8):358-65.
Dutil E, Arsenaut AB, Corriveau H, Prévost R. Protocole
d`évaluation de la fonction sensori-motrice:Test de FuglMeyer. Montréal: La librairie de I`Université de Montréal;
Gadotti IC, Vieira ER, Magge DJ. Importance and clarification
of measurement properties in rehabilitation. Rev Bras
Fisioter. 2006;10(2):137-46.
Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The
post stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of
physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7(1):13-31.
Sanford J, Moreland J, Swanson LR, Stratford PW, Gowland
C. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment for testing
motor performance in patients following stroke. Phys Ther.
;73:447-54.
Bell-Krotowski J, Tomancik E. The repeatability of testing
with Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments. J Hand Surg.
;12:155-61.
Silva FSR. Efeito da postura no controle da força de preensão
do membro superior não parético ao acidente vascular
encefálico [dissertação − pós-graduação strictu sensu em
Ciências do Movimento]. Florianópolis: Universidade do
Estado de Santa Catarina, 2011.
Torriani C, Mota EPO, Sales ALM, Ricci M, Nishida P, Marques
L, et al. Efeitos da estimulação motora e sensorial no pé de
pacientes hemiparéticos pós acidente vascular encefálico.
Rev Neurociênc. 2008;16(1):25-9.
Sousa MJN. Eficácia de um programa de estimulação
sensorial na mão em indivíduos com déficits sensoriais,
sequela de AVC [monografia − licenciatura em Fisioterapia].
Barcarena: Escola Superior de Saúde da Universidade
Atlântica, 2011.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Fisioterapia e Pesquisa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
