Is there any change in the function of the pelvic floor and abdominal muscles of primigravidae in the second and third trimester of pregnancy?

Authors

  • Ana Silvia Moccellin Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS); Departamento de Fisioterapia. SE. Brasil
  • Mariana Tirolli Rett Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS); Departamento de Fisioterapia. SE. Brasil
  • Patricia Driusso Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar); Departamento de Fisioterapia. São carlos. SP. Brasil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-2950/14156523022016

Abstract

The purpose was to compare the function of the pelvic floor muscles in the second and third trimester of pregnancy of primigravidae. The study was carried out in two Family Health Units of the municipality of Aracaju, state of Sergipe, Brazil. Pregnant women have undergone three evaluations of the function of the pelvic floor muscles, through surface electromyography: until 16 weeks of pregnancy, between the 24th-28th and 34th-36th week of pregnancy. We recorded resting values, maximum voluntary contractions and sustained contractions. Data was tabulated in Excel and analyzed statistically in the Statistica program. A 5% significance level (p ≤ 0.05) was adopted. Nineteen primigravidae participated in this study, with an average age of 21.74 ± 3.65 years. There was an increase in body mass in the third trimester of pregnancy compared with the pre-pregnancy period, decrease in the average of the pelvic floor muscle signal during rest, along the three assessments and, in relation to the abdominal muscles, there was a decrease in the average signal at rest and during the sustained contraction in assessments 2 and 3 when compared with assessment 1. We concluded that other factors, besides those related to increased maternal body mass, may be associated with overload on PFMs during pregnancy in the first trimester. This overload can cause pregnant women to have muscle tone near the upper reference limit, thus changing the pattern of electromyographic activity, especially at rest, to maintain its support function of the continence and pelvic organs.

Downloads

References

Hebert J. Pregnancy and childbirth: the effects on pelvic

floor muscles. Nurs Times. 2009;105(7):38-41.

Oliveira E, Takano CC, Sartori JP, Araujo MP, Pimentel SHC,

Sartori MGF, et al. Trato urinário, assoalho pélvico e ciclo

gravídico-puerperal. Femina. 2007;35(2):89-94.

Brown SJ, Donath S, MacArthur C, McDonald EA, Krastev

AH. Urinary incontinence in nulliparous women before and

during pregnancy: prevalence, incidence and associated risk

factors. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21:193-202.

Scarpa KP, Herrmann V, Palma PCR, Riccetto CLZ, Morais S.

Prevalência de sintomas urinários no terceiro trimestre da

gestação. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2006;52(3):153-6.

Solans-Domènech M, Sánches E, Espuña-Pons M. Urinary

and anal incontinence during pregnancy and postpartum.

Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115(3):618-28.

O’Boyle AL, O’Boyle JD, Ricks RE, Patience TH, Calhoun B,

Davis G. The natural history of pelvic organ support during

pregnancy. Int Urogynecol J. 2003;14:46-9.

Batista RL, Franco MM, Naldoni LM, Duarte G, Oliveira AS,

Ferreira CH. Biofeedback and the electromyographic activity

of pelvic floor muscles in pregnant women. Rev Bras Fisioter.

;15(5):386-92.

Botelho S, Riccetto C, Herrmann V, Pereira LC, Amorim C,

Palma P. Impact of delivery mode on electromyographic

activity of pelvic floor: comparative prospective study.

Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(7):1258-61.

WHO. Physical status: the use and interpretation of

anthropometry. Report of a WHO Expert Committee.

Technical Report Series: 854. Geneva: World Health

Organization; 1995.

Alexander GR, Tompkins ME, Cornely DA. Gestational

age reporting and preterm delivery. Public Health Rep.

;105(3):267-75.

Rossavick LK, Fishburne JI. Conceptional age, menstrual

age, and ultrasound age: A second trimester comparison of

pregnancies of known conceptional date with pregnancies

dated from the last menstrual period. Obstet Gynecol.

;73(2):243-9.

Atalah SE, Castillo LC, Castro SR, Aldea PA. Propuesta de un

nuevo estándar de evaluación nutricional en embarazadas.

Rev Med Chile. 1997;125(12):1429-36.

Soderberg GL, Knutson LM. A guide for use and

interpretation of kinesiologic electromyographic data. Phys

Ther. 2000;80(5):485-98.

Marchetti PH, Duarte M. Laboratório de Biofísica.

Instrumentação em Eletromiografia. Escola de Educação

Física e Esporte. Universidade de São Paulo. São Paulo,

, 28p.

Olsen AL, Rao SS. Clinical neurophysiology and

electrodiagnostic testing of the pelvic floor. Gastroenterol

Clin North Am. 2001;30(1):33-54.

Shafik A, Doss S, Assad S. Etiology of the resting myoelectric

activity of the levator ani muscle: physioanatomic study with

a new theory. Wold J Surg. 2003;27(3):309-14.

Ervilha UF, Duarte M, Amadio AC. Estudos sobre

procedimentos de normalização do sinal eletromiográfico

durante o movimento humano. Rev Bras Fisiot.

;3(1):15-20.

Grape HH, Dedering A, Jonasson AF. Retest reliability of

surface electromyography on the pelvic floor muscles.

Neurourol Urodyn. 2009;28(5):395-9.

Vodusek DB, Janko M, Lokar J. EMG, single fibre EMG and

sacral reflexes in assessment of sacral nervous system

lesions. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1982;45(11):1064-6.

Wehbe SA, Whitmore K, Kellogg-Spadt S. Urogenital

complaints and female sexual dysfunction (part 1). J SEX

MED. 2010;7(5):1704-13.

Lien KC, Mooney B, DeLancey JOL, Ashton-Miller JA. Levator

ani muscle stretch induced by simulated vaginal birth. Obstet

Gynecol. 2004;103(1):31-40.

Kudish BI, Iglesia CB, Sokol RJ, Cochrane B, Richter HE,

Larson J et al. Effect of weight change on natural history of

pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113(1):81-8.

Greer WJ, Richter HE, Bartolucci AA, Burgio KL. Obesity and

pelvic floor disorders: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol.

;112(2 Pt 1):341-9.

Stothers L, Friedman B. Risk factors for the development

of stress urinary incontinence in women. Curr Urol Rep.

;12(5):363-9.

Wijma J, Potters AE, de Wolf BT, Tinga DJ, Aarnoudse JG.

Anatomical and functional changes in the lower tract during

pregnancy. BJOG. 2003; 110(7):658-63.

Resende AP, Petricelli CD, Bernardes BT, Alexandre SM,

Nakamura MU, Zanetti MR. Electromyographic evaluation of

pelvic floor muscles in pregnant and nonpregnant women.

Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(8):1041-5.

Tincello DG, Teare J, Fraser WD. Second trimester

concentration of relaxin and pregnancy related incontinence.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003;106(2):237-8.

Wester C, Brubaker L. Normal pelvic floor physiology. Obstet

Gynecol Clin North Am. 1998;25(4):707-22.

Gilleard WL, Brown JMM. Structure and function of

the abdominal muscles in primigravid subjects during

pregnancy and the immediate posbirth period. Phys Ther.

;76(7):750-62.

Sapsford RR, Hodges PW, Richardson CA, Cooper DH,

Markwell SJ, Jull GA. Co-activation of the abdominal and

pelvic floor muscles during voluntary exercises. Neurourol

Urodyn. 2001;20(1):31-42.

Hodges PW, Sapsford R, Pengel LHM. Postural and

respiratory function of the pelvic floor muscles. Neurourol

Urodyn. 2007;26(3):362-71.

Brasil. Portaria nº 1459, de 24 de junho de 2011. Institui no

âmbito do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) a Rede Cegonha.

[acesso em 7 jul 2014]. Disponível em: http://www.ibfan.org.

br/legislacao/pdf/doc-693.pdf.

Published

2016-06-06

Issue

Section

Original Research

How to Cite

Is there any change in the function of the pelvic floor and abdominal muscles of primigravidae in the second and third trimester of pregnancy? . (2016). Fisioterapia E Pesquisa, 23(2), 136-141. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-2950/14156523022016