Exploring the Guianas Region through the "Lens" of Geography in Four Fieldworks (2017-2022)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2179-0892.geousp.2025.230026

Keywords:

Borders, Territorialities, Guianas Region, Fieldwork

Abstract

This article presents the results of four field expeditions conducted between 2017 and 2022 in the Guianas region. Exploring territorial and cultural dynamics, the research focused on cross-border interactions between Brazil, France (French Guiana), the Republic of Guyana, Suriname, and Venezuela. Through direct observation, interviews with local residents, and analysis of daily practices, the study systematizes new information on flows of people, goods, and cultures, showing how these interactions reshape local territorialities and geographical space. Daily practices and socioeconomic challenges were documented based on direct observations at the borders, revealing dynamics not previously captured. The fieldwork allowed a critical perspective on regional geopolitics and emerging territorialities, highlighting the relevance of mobility for understanding changes in the Amazonian geographical space.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Clicia Di Miceli, Governo do estado do Amapá

    Professora de Geografia da rede estadual de educação do Governo do Estado do Amapá, Macapá, AP, Brasil. Mestra em Estudos Fronteiriços (PPGEF-UNIFAP).

  • Gutemberg de Vilhena Silva, UNIFAP

    I graduated (UNIFAP), Master (UFRGS) and Doctorate (UFRJ) in Geography with Post-Doctorate from the University of São Paulo (USP), in 2015, and from the Sorbonne Nouvelle University, Paris 3, in 2016. I created and coordinate the Group Policy Research and Development (POTEDES). My current interests focus on assessing geopolitical aspects of the Guyana region.

References

ABBOTT, D. Disrupting the “whiteness” of fieldwork in geography. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, v. 27, n. 3, p. 326–341, 2006. Disponível em: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9493.2006.00265.x

ABREU DE AZEVEDO, D.; RIBEIRO, R. W. Expedições, excursões e trabalhos de campo no entendimento geográfico. Boletim Goiano de Geografia, 2024. Disponível em: https://revistas.ufg.br/bgg/article/view/77736

ALENTEJANO, P. R. R.; ROCHA-LEÃO, O. M. Trabalho de campo: Uma ferramenta essencial aos geógrafos ou um instrumento banalizado ? Boletim Paulista De Geografia, n. 84, p. 51–68, 2006. Disponível em: https://publicacoes.agb.org.br/boletim-paulista/article/view/727

BENEDETTI, A. Claves para pensar las fronteras desde una perspectiva geográfica. Geousp - espaço e tempo, v. 22, n. 2, p. 309–328, 2018. Disponível em: https://www.revistas.usp.br/geousp/article/view/133707

BÖHM, H. Five Roles of Cross-border Cooperation Against Re-bordering. Journal of Borderlands Studies, v. 38, n. 3, p. 487–506, 2023. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08865655.2021.1948900

BOSWELL, J.; CORBETT, J.; RHODES, R. A. Fieldwork. In: BOSWELL, J.; CORBETT, J.; RHODES, R. A. (Eds.). The Art and Craft of Comparison. 1. ed. [s.l.] Cambridge University Press, 2019.

BRANDÃO, C. M. M. B. Escritas Urbanas: sobre expressões artísticas na fronteira. RELACult – Revista Latino-Americana de Estudos em Cultura e Sociedade, 2016. Disponível em: https://periodicos.claec.org/index.php/relacult/article/view/272

BREEN, R. L. A practical guide to focus-group research. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, v. 30, n. 3, p. 463–475, 2006. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03098260600927575

BRUNET-JAILLY, E. Theorizing borders: An interdisciplinary perspective. Geopolitics, v. 10, n. 4, p. 633–649, 2005. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14650040500318449

BYKLUM, D. Geography and music: Making the connection. Journal of Geography, v. 93, n. 6, p. 274–278, 1994. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00221349408979833

CARNEIRO, S. M.. O Trabalho de campo e o Estudo em Laboratório: Importância e Viabilidade no Ensino de Geografiua segundo posicionamentro de professores das escolas de primeiro e segundo graus de Curitiba. Educar: Curitiba, 1987. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/j/er/a/vqGGH8qxzB7skCMVBcByBkf/?lang=pt

DILLA ALFONSO, H.; CHAVEZ, M. La formación de las regiones transfronterizas: la experiencia latinoamericana. Geopolítica(s). Revista de estudios sobre espacio y poder, v. 14, n. 2, p. 195–215, 5 dez. 2023. Disponível em: https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/GEOP/article/view/85395

FOUCHER, M. Le retour des frontières. CNRS Éditions (Débats), 2016. Disponível em:

KATZ, C. Playing the field: Questions of fieldwork in geography. Professional Geographer, v. 46, n. 1, p. 67–72, 1994. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240518445_Playing_the_Field_Questions_of_Fieldwork_in_Geography

KOLOSSOV, V. Border studies: Changing perspectives and theoretical approaches. Geopolitics, v. 10, n. 4, p. 606–632, 2005. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/248945508_Border_Studies_Changing_Perspectives_and_Theoretical_Approaches

LAMBERT, D.; REISS, M. J. The place of fieldwork in geography qualifications. Geography, v. 101, n. 1, p. 28–34, 2016. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00167487.2016.12093980

MAINS, S. P. Fieldwork, heritage and engaging landscape texts. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, v. 38, n. 4, p. 525–545, 2014. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03098265.2014.958655

MARGARIT, E. A ressignificação da navegação no Baixo amazonas a partir da integração ao circuito produtivo do agronegócio. Revista Terceira Margem Amazônica, v. 3, p. 38–55, 2018. Disponível em: https://www.revistaterceiramargem.com/index.php/terceiramargem/article/view/231/169

MAY, J. Developing fieldwork in social and cultural geography: Illustrations from a residential field class in Los Angeles and Las Vegas. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, v. 23, n. 2, p. 207–225, 1999. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03098269985470

MUKHERJEE, F. Exploring cultural geography field course using story maps. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, v. 43, n. 2, p. 201–223, 2019. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338921636_Exploring_cultural_geography_field_course_using_story_maps

NEWMAN, D. Borders and bordering: Towards an interdisciplinary dialogue. Journal of Asian and African Studies, v. 41, n. 3, p. 171–186, 2006. Disponível em: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1368431006063331

NEWMAN, D. Contemporary Research Agendas in Border Studies: An Overview. The Ashgate Research Companion to Border Studies, p. 33–48, 2016. Disponível em: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315612782-12/contemporary-research-agendas-border-studies-overview-david-newman

PAASI, A. et al. Locating the territoriality of territory in border studies. Political Geography, v. 95, n. December 2021, p. 102584, 2022. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357809506_Locating_the_territoriality_of_territory_in_border_studies

Autor 1, 2020

Autor 1, 2023

Autor 1; GRANGER, 2021

Autor 1; 2, 2023

STOKES, A.; MAGNIER, K.; WEAVER, R. What is the use of fieldwork? Conceptions of students and staff in geography and geology. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, v. 35, n. 1, p. 121–141, 2011. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03098265.2010.487203

Published

2025-12-02

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

DI MICELI, Clicia; SILVA, Gutemberg de Vilhena. Exploring the Guianas Region through the "Lens" of Geography in Four Fieldworks (2017-2022). GEOUSP Espaço e Tempo (Online), São Paulo, Brasil, v. 29, n. 2, 2025. DOI: 10.11606/issn.2179-0892.geousp.2025.230026. Disponível em: https://revistas.usp.br/geousp/article/view/230026. Acesso em: 1 feb. 2026.