Intersubjectivity: theoretical approaches and implications for early child development

Authors

  • Susana Engelhard Nogueira
  • Maria Lucia Seidl de Moura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.19839

Keywords:

Intersubjectivity, Early child development

Abstract

The intersubjectivity concept has been approached according to different interpretations in Psychology. The aim of this article is to present some theoretical bases pertaining to this concept, pointing out how its use has been treated by early child development studies in the last decades. We discuss and compare different theoretical perspectives that approach the function of intersubjectivity and of social interaction in child development. These perspectives may contribute to a conception of intersubjectivity as an inherent aspect in basic processes that involve reciprocity, such as early communication, social interaction, and affectivity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Penteado JRW. A técnica da comunicação humana. São Paulo: Pioneira; 1993.

Joppling D. Cognitive science, other minds and the philosophy of dialogue. In: Neisser U, editor. The perceived self. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1993. p.290-309.

Braten S. Introduction. In: Braten S, editor. Inter subjectivity communication and emotion in early ontogeny. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998. p.01-12.

Tomasello M. Social cognition before the revolution. In: Rochat P, editor. Early social cognition: understanding others in the first months of life. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1999. p.301-14.

Gopnik A, Meltzoff A. Imitation, cultural learning and the origins of “theory of mind”. Commentary. Behavioral and Brain Sciences1993; 16: 521-3.

Trevarthen C. Conversations with a two-month-old. New Scientist1974; 2: 230-5.

Trevarthen, C. The concept of foundations of infant inter subjectivity. In: Braten S, editor. Inter subjectivity communication and emotion in early ontogeny. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998. p.15-46.

Bateson MC. The interpersonal context of infant vocalization. Quarterly Progress Report of the Research Laboratory of Electronics. 1971; 100: 170-6.

Trevarthen C, Hubley P. Secondary inter subjectivity: confidence, confiding and acts of meaning in the first year. In: Lock A,editor. Action, gesture and symbol: the emergence of language. London: Academic Press; 1978. p.183-229.

Piaget J. The first year of life of the child. In: Gruber HE, Vonèche JJ, editors. The essential Piaget: an interpretive reference and guide. Northvale/London: Jason Aronson; 1996.p.199-214. (original publicado em 1927/1928).

Seidl de Moura ML, Ribas AFP. Evidências sobre características de bebês recém-nascidos: um convite a reflexões teóricas. In: Seidl de Moura ML, editor. O bebê do século XXI e a psicologia em desenvolvimento. São Paulo: Casa do Psicólogo; 2004. p.21-59.

Stern D. O mundo interpessoal do bebê. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas; 1992.

Mahler M. As psicoses infantis e outros estudos. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas; 1983.

Rochat P, Striano T. Social-cognitive development in the first year. In: Rochat P, editor. Early social cognition: understanding others in the first months of life. Mahwah, New Jersey & London: Lawrence Erlbaum;1999. p.03-34.

Trevarthen C. Modes of perceiving and modes of acting. In: Pick JH, editor. Psychological modes of perceiving and process inginformation. New Jersey: Erlbaum; 1978.p.99-136.

Rochat P. The infant’s world. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1991.

Downloads

Published

2007-08-01

Issue

Vol. 17 No. 2 (2007)

Section

Current Comments

License

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL  PUBLISHERS

 

Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:

 

Publishers should:

 

  • Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
  • Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
  • Protect intellectual property and copyright
  • Foster editorial independence

 

Publishers should work with journal editors to:

 

  • Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:

–         Editorial  independence

–         Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research

–         Authorship

–         Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards

–         Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor

–         Appeals and complaints

  • Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
  • Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
  • Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
  • Maintain the integrity of the academic record
  • Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
  • Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
  • Publish content on a timely basis