Intersubjetividade: perspectivas teóricas e implicações para o desenvolvimento infantil inicial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.19839Palabras clave:
Intersubjetividade, Interação social, Desenvolvimento infantil inicial, Social interactionResumen
O conceito de intersubjetividade tem sido abordado segundo diferentes interpretações no campo da Psicologia. Este artigo tem como objetivo apresentar fundamentos teóricos desse conceito, apontando sua utilização em estudos sobre o desenvolvimento infantil inicial nas últimas décadas. Busca-se ainda discutir e comparar diferentes perspectivas teóricas que abordam o papel da intersubjetividade e da interação social no desenvolvimento infantil. Entende-se que as perspectivas discutidas não esgotam plenamente o tema, mas contribuem para uma reflexão sobre como a intersubjetividade pode ser vista como aspecto indissociado de processos básicos que envolvem reciprocidade como a comunicação inicial, interação social e afetividade.Descargas
Referencias
Penteado JRW. A técnica da comunicação humana. São Paulo: Pioneira; 1993.
Joppling D. Cognitive science, other minds and the philosophy of dialogue. In: Neisser U, editor. The perceived self. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1993. p.290-309.
Braten S. Introduction. In: Braten S, editor. Inter subjectivity communication and emotion in early ontogeny. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998. p.01-12.
Tomasello M. Social cognition before the revolution. In: Rochat P, editor. Early social cognition: understanding others in the first months of life. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1999. p.301-14.
Gopnik A, Meltzoff A. Imitation, cultural learning and the origins of “theory of mind”. Commentary. Behavioral and Brain Sciences1993; 16: 521-3.
Trevarthen C. Conversations with a two-month-old. New Scientist1974; 2: 230-5.
Trevarthen, C. The concept of foundations of infant inter subjectivity. In: Braten S, editor. Inter subjectivity communication and emotion in early ontogeny. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998. p.15-46.
Bateson MC. The interpersonal context of infant vocalization. Quarterly Progress Report of the Research Laboratory of Electronics. 1971; 100: 170-6.
Trevarthen C, Hubley P. Secondary inter subjectivity: confidence, confiding and acts of meaning in the first year. In: Lock A,editor. Action, gesture and symbol: the emergence of language. London: Academic Press; 1978. p.183-229.
Piaget J. The first year of life of the child. In: Gruber HE, Vonèche JJ, editors. The essential Piaget: an interpretive reference and guide. Northvale/London: Jason Aronson; 1996.p.199-214. (original publicado em 1927/1928).
Seidl de Moura ML, Ribas AFP. Evidências sobre características de bebês recém-nascidos: um convite a reflexões teóricas. In: Seidl de Moura ML, editor. O bebê do século XXI e a psicologia em desenvolvimento. São Paulo: Casa do Psicólogo; 2004. p.21-59.
Stern D. O mundo interpessoal do bebê. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas; 1992.
Mahler M. As psicoses infantis e outros estudos. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas; 1983.
Rochat P, Striano T. Social-cognitive development in the first year. In: Rochat P, editor. Early social cognition: understanding others in the first months of life. Mahwah, New Jersey & London: Lawrence Erlbaum;1999. p.03-34.
Trevarthen C. Modes of perceiving and modes of acting. In: Pick JH, editor. Psychological modes of perceiving and process inginformation. New Jersey: Erlbaum; 1978.p.99-136.
Rochat P. The infant’s world. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1991.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis