PROFILE OF TECHNOLOGY-DEPENDENT CHILDREN IN RIBEIRÃO PRETO-SP
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.46356Keywords:
pediatric nursing, child care, chronic lllness.Abstract
The aim of this descriptive and exploratory research with a quantitative approach was to characterize technology-dependent children living in Ribeirão Preto – SP regarding gestation and birth conditions, origin of the special health needs and care demands. Participants were 102 mothers or responsible caregivers. Data were collected between January and April 2011 through the application of a form during home visits. The results revealed that 57% of the children are male; the predominant age range was between 1 and 4 years; 7.8% of the mothers had no prenatal follow-up; 96% were born in hospitals; 63.7% through c-section and, in 29.3% of cases, the children were premature. As for the origin of the special health needs, 65.7% had some congenital problem, 30.4% experienced problems during delivery and/or in the neonatal period and 30.4% experienced problems during the lifetime, defined as acquired causes. Regarding special care demands, all children display technological care demands, 92 need medication care, 74 developmental care and 102 modified habitual care. The study appoints relevant data to broaden these clients’ visibility in official rates and public policies, so as to guarantee qualified and comprehensive care delivery.
Downloads
References
Macinko J, Guanais FC, Souza MFM. Evaluation of the impact of the family health program on infant mortality in Brazil, 1990-2002. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006; 60(1):13-19.
Ministério da Saúde. Saúde Brasil 2004: uma análise da situação de saúde. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2004. 364p.
Drumond EF, Machado CJ, França E. Óbitos neonatais precoces: análise de causas múltiplas de morte pelo método Grade of Membership. Cad Saúde Pública. 2007; 23(1):157-166.
Kirk S, Glendinning C, Callery P. Parent or nurse? The experience of being the parent of a technology – dependent child. J Adv Nurs. 2005; 51(5): 456-64.
Brown-Hellsten M. Doença Crônica, Incapacidade ou Tratamento Terminal para a Criança e Família. In: Hockenberry MJ, Wlison D, Winkelstein ML. Wong Fundamentos de Enfermagem Pediátrica. 7ª ed. Rio de Janeiro (RJ): Guanabara- Koogan, 1999. p. 549-88.
McPherson MG, Arango P, Fox H, Lauver C, McManus M, Newachek PW, et al. A new definition of children with special health care needs. Pediatrics. 1998; 102(1):137-41.
Kirk S, Glendinning C. Supporting “expert” parents- professional support and families caring for a child with complex health care needs in the community. Int J Nurs Stud. 2002; 39: 625-35.
Neves-Vernier ET. O empoderamento de cuidadoras de crianças com necessidades especiais de saúde: interfaces com o cuidado de enfermagem. [tese]. Rio de Janeiro: Escola de Enfermagem Anna Nery, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro; 2007. p. 172.
Leal RJ. Os (des) caminhos dos cuidados às crianças com necessidades especiais de saúde no discurso das famílias: subsídios para uma política de seguimento. [tese]. Rio de Janeiro: Escola de Enfermagem Anna Nery, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro; 2007. p. 141.
Vernier ETN, Cabral IE. Caracterização das crianças com necessidades especiais de saúde e seus familiares cuidadores, Santa Maria (RS), 2004-2005: subsídios para intervenções de enfermagem. Rev Soc Bras Enferm Ped. 2006; 6(1): 37-45.
Dyck PC, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of children with special health care needs. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004; 158: 885-90.
Glendinning C, Kirk S., Guiffrida AE, Lawton D. Techonology- dependent children in community: definitions, numbers and costs. Child Care Health Dev. 2001; 27(4): 321-334.
Cabral IE, Silva JJ, Zillmann DO, Moraes JRMM, Rodrigues EC. A criança egressa da terapia intensiva pediátrica na luta pela sobrevida. Rev Bras Enferm. 2004; 57(1): 35-9.
Polit D, Beck CT, Hungler B. Delineamentos para a pesquisa em Enfermagem. In: Polit D, Beck CT, Hungler B. Fundamentos de pesquisa em enfermagem: métodos, avaliação e utilização. 5ª ed. Porto Alegre (RS): Artmed; 2004. p. 161-244.
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Estatuto da Criança e do Adolescente. Lei nº 8.069 de 13 de julho de 1990. Dispõem sobre a proteção integral da criança e do adolescente. Diário Oficial [da] Republica Federativa do Brasil, Brasília,
jul.1990.
Ribeirão Preto, 2009. Relatório de Gestão da Secretária Municipal de Saúde do Município de Ribeirão Preto - 2010 (endereço http://www.ribeiraopreto.sp.gov.br/ssaude).
Kirk S. How children and young people construct and negotiate living with medical technology. Social Science & Medicine. 2010;71: 1796-1803.
Cabral IE, Moraes JRMM, Santos FF. O egresso da terapia intensiva neonatal de três instituições públicas e a demanda de cuidados especiais. Esc Anna Nery Rev Enferm. 2003; 7(2):210-217.
Reis AT. O significado da cirurgia neonatal na presença de malformações congênitas: a visão materna para o cuidar de enfermagem. [tese]. Rio de Janeiro: Escola de Enfermagem Anna Nery, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro; 2010.
Gaíva MAM, Corrêa ER, Santo EARE. Perfil clínico-epidemiológico de crianças e adolescentes que vivem e convivem com espinha bífida. Rev Bras Crescimento Desenvolvimento Hum. 2011; 21(1): 99-110.
Silva MAI, Pan R, Melo L, Bortoli OS, Nascimento LC. Perfil dos atendimentos a crianças e adolescentes vítimas de causas externas de morbimortalidade, 2000-2006. Rev Gaúcha Enferm. 2010; 31(2): 351-8.
Fracolli RA, Angelo MA Experiência da família que possui uma criança dependente de tecnologia. Rev Min Enferm. 2006; 10(2): 125-131.
Wang KW, Barnard A. Technology-dependent children and their families: a review. J Adv Nurs. 2004; 45(1): 36-46.
Pinto JP, Ribeiro CA, Pettengill MAM. O processo de recuperação da criança após a alta hospitalar: revisão integrativa. Acta Paul Enferm. 2010; 23(6): 837-42.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis
