Historiographical Trajectory of Artificial Intelligence: Contexts and Influences
Keywords:
history of science, artificial intelligence, social influences, social and work psychology, historiographyAbstract
The history of artificial intelligence (AI) spans various contexts, including culture, science, businesses, and government. Over time, theoretical advances have guided technological research, propelling development in six dimensions: capture, representation, storage, processing, modeling, and action. The integration of AI into society has entailed changes influenced by these four contexts. From myths and alchemy to the Industrial Revolution and the emergence of research institutions, AI has traversed cultures and commercial interests, shaping its course throughout history. This work provides an analysis of the trajectory of artificial intelligence, highlighting significant contributions that have shaped its development, aiming to identify the interests that have directed it. Understanding such interests can facilitate a technological and socio-political understanding over time, demystifying artificial intelligence as a recent subject and enabling critical analyses of its history.
Downloads
References
BUCHANAN, Bruce. A (Very) Brief History of Artificial Intelligence, em AI Magazine, v. 26, n. 4, p. 53-60, 2005.
Data Protection Laws of the World, por DLA Piper. Disponível em https://www.dlapiperdataprotection.com/.
DREYFUS, Hubert. Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time, Division I. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1991.
DREYFUS, Hubert. What Computers Can’t Do: The Limits of Artificial Intelligence. 1972. Disponível em https://archive.org/details/whatcomputerscan017504mbp/page/n7/mode/2up .
DREYFUS, Hubert. Why Heideggerian Artificial Intelligence failed and how fixing it would require making it more Heideggerian, em Philosophical Psychology. Londres: 2007.
DURAND, Gilbert. Champs de l’Imaginaire. Ellug, 1996. Tradução por Maria João Batalha Reis.
FAUR, Mirella. Ragnarök: o Crepúsculo dos Deuses. São Paulo: Cultrix, 2011.
FEIGENBAUM, Edward A.; FELDMAN, Julian. Computers and Thought. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963.
FLEMING, Nic. Machine that can taste coffee invented, em The Telegraph, 2008. Disponível em telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/3324864/Machine-that-can-taste-coffee-invented.html .
HEADRICK, Daniel. Technology: A World History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
IDEL, Moshe. Golem: Jewish Magical and Mystical Traditions on the Artificial Anthropoid. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1990.
Introducing ChatGPT, por OpenAI, em 30/11/2022. Disponível em https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt .
JUNG, Carl. Alchemical Studies, em The Collected Works of C. G. Jung. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1968.
MCCORDUCK, Pamela. Machines Who Think. Natick: A. K. Peters Ltd., 2004. Publicação original em 1979.
MCCULLOCH, Warren S.; PITTS, Walter H.. A Logical Calculus of the Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity, em BODEN, Margaret A. (Org.). The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990. Publicação original de 1943.
MINSKY, Marvin. Semantic Information Processing. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1968.
NEUMANN, John von. First Draft of a Report on the EDVAC. University of Pennsylvania, 1945.
NOF, Shimon. Handbook of Industrial Robotics. Hoboken: Wiley, 1999.
NUNES, Luiz J.. Artifício: Um estudo introdutório dos aspectos psicossociais da artificialização das inteligências. São Paulo: Dialética, 2023.
ONGWESO JR., Edward. Everybody Please Calm Down About ChatGPT, no site Vice. 2022. Disponível em https://www.vice.com/en/article/everybody-please-calm-down-about-chatgpt/ .
OpenAI API, por OpenAI, em 11/06/2020. Disponível em https://openai.com/blog/openai-api .
PIAGET, Jean. Psychology of Intelligence. New Jersey: Littlefield, Adams & Co., 1960.
ROSENBLATT, Frank. The Perceptron: a Perceiving and Recognizing Automaton. Buffalo: Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory, Inc., 1957.
ROSENBLATT, Frank. The Perceptron: a Probabilistic Model for Information Storage and Organization in the Brain, em Psychological Review, v. 65, n. 6, p. 386-408, 1958.
RUSSELL, Stuart Jonathan & NORVIG, Peter. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1995.
SCHANK, Roger; ABELSON, Robert. Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding: an Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures. Hillsdale: Erlbaum, 1977.
TURING, Alan M.. Computing machinery and intelligence, em Mind, número 49. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1950.
WEIZENBAUM, Joseph. ELIZA: A Computer Program for the Study of Natural Language Communication Between Man and Machine. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1965.
WEIZENBAUM, Joseph. Computer Power and Human Reason. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1976.
WINOGRAD, Terry. A Procedural Model of Language Understanding, em SCHANK, Roger & COLBY, Kenneth, Computer Models of Thought and Language. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1973.
WU, Shijie, IRSOY, Ozan, LU, Steven, DABRAVOLSKI, Vadim, DREDZE, Mark, GEHRMANN, Sebastian, KAMBADUR, Prabhanjan, ROSENBERG, David & MANN, Gideon. BloombergGPT: A Large Language Model for Finance. 2023. Disponível em https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.17564 .
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License in the "Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International" (CC BY-NC 4.0) modality that allows sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
- Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (eg in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes, as well as increase impact and citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- Any doubts or complaints about copyright must be directed to the Editorial Board or qualify and express themselves in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publications Ethics (COPE).
