Neurociência (s): a divulgação científica entre a utopia e a distopia

Authors

  • Rita C. C. M. Couto Universidade de São Paulo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/khronos.v0i2.126103

Abstract

The text weaves considerations about the divulgation and the historical-social appropriation of the result of the research in neuroscience, considered plural by encompass different areas of knowledge. To discuss on its role as scientific practice, the utopian aspect of vision around the same is emphasized, while the dystopia shows up as counterpoint of utopia. The dystopian aspect presented is the "ghost" of eugenics, which to be avoided demand constant discussions about Neuroethics, as advocates Brazilian neuroscientist and scientific disseminator Roberto Lent, for whom science should be divulged and discussed, because the society is responsible for it

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2017-02-06

Issue

No. 2 (2016)

Section

Artigos

License

Copyright (c) 2017 Rita C. C. M. Couto

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License in the "Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International" (CC BY-NC 4.0) modality that allows sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
  2. Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (eg in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes, as well as increase impact and citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. Any doubts or complaints about copyright must be directed to the Editorial Board or qualify and express themselves in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publications Ethics (COPE).

 

How to Cite

Couto, R. C. C. M. (2017). Neurociência (s): a divulgação científica entre a utopia e a distopia. Khronos, 2, 71-85. https://doi.org/10.11606/khronos.v0i2.126103