Intersectionality Theory, Challenges for Empirical Research and Contributions to Psychology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4327e3327Keywords:
intersectional framework, empirical research, psychologyAbstract
The Theory of Intersectionality is an important contribution from feminist epistemologies to the scientific field. This narrative literature review aims to discuss methodological possibilities and challenges in producing and analyzing empirical evidence based on the Theory of Intersectionality, as well as its contributions to Psychology. While this theory is increasingly being cited as the basis for empirical research, articulating its assumptions in knowledge production processes is still a difficulty. Qualitative approaches prevail in the field, but advancements in statistical analysis methods allow for an intersectional interpretation in quantitative studies. Intersectionality contributes to understanding psychological processes and challenging dominant and exclusionary assumptions in the field of Psychology. Embracing this theory requires a commitment to the imperative of social transformation and entails placing claims, values, practices, and power relations at the core of scientific knowledge production, regardless of the field under study.
Downloads
References
Alvarez, C. H., & Evans, C. R. (2021). Intersectional environmental justice and population health inequalities: A novel approach. Social Science & Medicine, 269, 113559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113559
Anzaldúa, G. (1987). Borderlands/la frontera: The new mestiza. Aunt Lute Books.
American Psychological Association. (2006). Evidence-based practice in psychology. The American Psychologist, 61(4), 271-285. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.4.271
Bauer, G. R., Churchill, S. M., Mahendran, M., Walwyn, C., Lizotte, D., & Villa-Rueda, A. A. (2021). Intersectionality in quantitative research: A systematic review of its emergence and applications of theory and methods. SSM - Population Health, 14, 100798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100798
Bohrer, A. J. (2019). Marxism and intersectionality: Race, gender, class and sexuality under contemporary capitalism. Transcript Publishing.
Bowleg, L. (2017). Intersectionality: An underutilized but essential theoretical framework for social psychology. In B. Gough (Ed.), The Palgrave handbook of critical social psychology (pp. 507–529). Palgrave Macmillan/Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51018-1_25
Burman, E. (2004). Taking women’s voices: The psychological politics of feminisation. Psychology of Women Section Review, 6(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpspow.2004.6.1.3
Clauss-Ehlers, C. S., Chiriboga, D. A., Hunter, S. J., Roysircar, G., & Tummala-Narra, P. (2019). APA Multicultural Guidelines executive summary: Ecological approach to context, identity, and intersectionality. American Psychologist, 74(2), 232–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000382
Collins, P. H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, counciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Routledge.
Collins, P. H. (2022). Bem mais que ideias: A interseccionalidade como teoria social crítica [Intersectionality as critical social theory]. Boitempo.
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139-167. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8
Diniz, D. (2007). O que é deficiência [What is disability?]. Brasiliense.
Else-Quest, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (2020). Implementing intersectionality in psychology with quantitative methods. In S. Crasnow & K. Intemann (Eds.), Routledge handbook of feminist philosophy of science (pp. 340-352). Routledge.
Evans, C. R. (2019). Modeling the intersectionality of processes in the social production of health inequalities. Social Science & Medicine, 226, 249-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.01.017
Federici, S. (2018). El patriarcado del salario: Críticas feministas al marxismo [Patriarchy of the wage: Notes on Marx, gender and feminism]. Traficantes de Sueños.
Gonzalez, L. (2020). Por um feminismo afro-latino-americano: Ensaios, intervenções e diálogos [For an afro-latin-american feminism: Essays, interventions and dialogues]. Zahar.
Grzanka, P. R. (2018). Intersectionality and feminist psychology: Power, knowledge, and process. In C. B. Travis, J. W. White, A. Rutherford, W. S. Williams, S. L. Cook, & K. F. Wyche (Eds.), APA handbook of the psychology of women: History, theory, and battlegrounds (pp. 585–602). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000059-030
Hancock, A. M. (2007). Intersectionality as a normative and empirical paradigm. Politics & Gender, 3(2), 248-254. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X07000062
Harding, S. G. (1987). Feminism and methodology: Social science issues. Indiana University Press.
May, V. M. (2015). Pursuing intersectionality, unsettling dominant imaginaries. Routledge.
McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs, 30(3), 1771-1800. https://doi.org/10.1086/426800
Oyeùmí, O. (2020). Conceituando o gênero: Os fundamentos eurocêntricos dos conceitos feministas e o desafio das epistemologias africanas [Conceptualizing gender: The eurocentric foundations of feminist concepts and the challege of african epistemologies]. In H. B. Hollanda (Org.), Pensamento feminista hoje: Perspectivas decoloniais [Feminist thought today: decolonial perspectives]. Bazar do Tempo.
Piscitelli, A. (2008). Interseccionalidades, categorias de articulação e experiências de migrantes brasileiras [Intersectionalities, articulations and experiences of brazilian migrants]. Sociedade e Cultura, 11(2), 263-274. https://doi.org/10.5216/sec.v11i2.5247
Rice, C., Harrison, E., & Friedman, M. (2019). Doing justice to intersectionality in research. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 19(6), 409–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708619829779
Saffioti, H. (2013). A mulher na sociedade de classes: Mito e realidade [Women in class society: Myths and truths] (2a ed.). Expressão Popular.
Scheim, A. I., & Bauer, G. R. (2019). The intersectional discrimination index: Development and validation of measures of self-reported enacted and anticipated discrimination for intercategorical analysis. Social Science & Medicine, 226, 225–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.12.016
Silva, R. A., & Menezes, J. A. (2020). A interseccionalidade na produção científica brasileira [Intersectionality in Brazilian scientific production]. Revista Pesquisas e Práticas Psicossociais, 15(4), 1-16. http://seer.ufsj.edu.br/revista_ppp/article/view/e3252/2468
Teo, T. (2005). The critique of psychology: From Kant to postcolonial theory. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/b107225
Warner, L. R., Settles, I. H., & Shields, S. A. (2016). Invited reflection: Intersectionality as an epistemological challenge to psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(2), 171-176. https://doi-org.ez67.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1177/0361684316641384
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Regarding the availability of contents, Paideia adopts the Creative Commons License, CC-BY. With this licence anyone is allowed to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, as well as to remix, transform, and create from the material for any purpose, even commercial, giving the proper copyright credits to the journal, providing a link to the licence and indicating if changes have been made.
Partial reproduction of other publications
Quotations of more than 500 words, reproductions of one or more figures, tables or other illustrations must have written permission from the copyright holder of the original work for the reproduction specified in the Paidéia journal. Permission should be addressed to the author of the submitted manuscript. Secondarily obtained rights will not be transferred under any circumstance.
