Reflections on the practice of clinical supervision in a social constructionist orientation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6564e220147

Keywords:

professional education, clinical supervisión, narrative practices, narrative therapy, social constructionism

Abstract

The scientific literature and several theoretical approaches in professional practices value supervision as part of therapists’ continued education. Still, understandings of supervision differ, ranging from its name to its goals are and forms of conduction. This study reflects on the practice of clinical supervision based on a social constructionist epistemology. By dialoguing with authors, we describe supervision as a practice of intervision and offer useful conversational resources for its development. We discuss how the construction of the conversational context and the adoption of some narrative practices may contribute to broadening clients’ stories and therapists’ selves. We hope to contribute to a systematization of the ideas in the field to collaborate with professionals who are involved in the continued education of therapists.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Carla Guanaes-Lorenzi, University of São Paulo

    Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

  • Giovanna Cabral Doricci, University of Ribeirão Preto

    Universidade de Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil.

References

Andersen, T. (2002). Processos reflexivos (2a ed.). Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Instituto Noos. (Trabalho original publicado em 1991)

Anderson, H. (2000). “Supervision” as a collaborative learning community. American Association for Marital and Family Therapy Supervision Bulletin, 7-10. Recuperado de https://higherlogicdownload.s3.amazonaws.com/AAMFT/ebc06b6c-aaf5-4c76-b41f-c59c4691665d/UploadedImages/anderson_2000_collaborative.pdf

Anderson, H. (2016). Commentary I: Reflection on `Dialogical Research in Therapy Supervision`: Doing Supervising as a Relational Event. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 37(3), 297-298. doi: 10.1002/anzf.1162

Carlson, T. D., & Erickson, M. J. (2001). Honouring and privileging personal experience and knowledge: ideas for a narrative therapy approach to the training and supervision of new therapists. Contemporary Family Therapy, 23(2), 199-220. Recuperado de https://www.ndsu.edu/fileadmin/hdfs/TC_Honoring_and_Privileging_personal_experience.pdf

Copeland, P., Dean, R. G., & Wladkowski, S. P. (2011). The power dynamics of supervision: Ethical dilemmas. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 81(1), 26-40. doi: 10.1080/00377317.2011.543041

Cruz, H. M. (2011). Como ensinar a não saber? Nova Perspectiva Sistêmica, 20(41), 65-84. Recuperado de https://revistanps.com.br/nps/article/view/206

Doricci, G. C., Crovador, L. F., & Martins, P. P. S. (2017). O especialista relacional na terapia familiar de fundamentação epistemológica construcionista social. Nova Pespectiva Sistêmica, 26(59), 37-51. Recuperado de https://www.revistanps.com.br/nps/article/view/315

Flam, A. M. (2016). Dialogical research in supervision: practical guidelines from experienced supervisors in family therapy, child protection, and specialty mental health services. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 37(3), 282-296. doi: 10.1002/anzf.1158

Gergen, K. J., & Ness, O. (2016). Therapeutic practice as social construction. In: M. O’Reilly, J. N. Lester (Eds), The Palgrave Handbook of Adult Mental Health (pp. 502-519). London: Palgrave MacMillan.

Houaiss. (2015). Pequeno dicionário Houaiss da Língua Portuguesa. São Paulo, SP: Moderna.

London, S., & Rodriguez-Jazcilevich, I. (2020). Supervisão: um encontro com a vulnerabilidade. In: A. Arnold et al. (Eds), Construção Social em Ação: Contribuições da Conferência de 25 anos de Aniversário do Taos Institute (pp. 164-169). Chagrin Falls: Taos Institute Publications.

McNamee, S. (2014). Construindo conhecimento/construindo investigação: coordenando mundos de pesquisa. In: C. Guanaes-Lorenzi, M. Moscheta, C. M. Corradi-Webster, L. V. Souza (Orgs.), Construcionismo social: discurso, pratica e produção de conhecimento (pp. 105-131). Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Instituto Noos.

McNamee, S., & Gergen, K. (2020). Introdução. In: S. McNamee & K. Gergen, A terapia como construção social (pp. 19-26, 2a. Ed). São Paulo, SP: Instituto Noos. (Texto original publicado em 1995).

Rasera, E. F., & Japur, M. (2018). Grupo como construção social: aproximações entre o construcionismo social e a terapia de grupo (2a. ed). São Paulo, SP: Instituto Noos. (Trabalho original publicado em 2007).

Reynolds, V. (2013). Centring ethics in group supervision: fostering cultures of critique and structuring safety. The international Journal of Narrative Therapy and Community Work, (1), 1-13. Recuperado de https://vikkireynolds.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/2014reynoldscentering-ethics-in-group-supervision.pdf

Rosas, E., & Rapizo, R. (2011). Construcionismo social e a formação de terapeuta: Em busca de coerência. Nova Perspectiva Sistêmica, 20(41), 54-64. Recuperado de https://www.revistanps.com.br/nps/article/view/205

Vicente, A. T., Japur. M., Cesar, A. B. C., Ruffino, C. M. C., & Russo, R. (2015). The construction of the conversational context of the group. In: E. F. Rasera (Ed), Social Constructionist Perspectives on Group Work (pp. 61-71). Chagrin Falls: The Taos Institute Publication.

White, M. (1992). Training ad supervision in family therapy in a world of living and narrative. In: D. Epston & M. White, Experience, contradiction, narrative and imagination: Selected papers of David Epston & Michael White, 1989-1991. Adelaide: Dulwich Centre Publications.

White, M. (2012). Mapas da prática narrativa. Porto Alegre, RS: Pacartes. (Trabalho original publicado em 2006).

Published

2025-06-23

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Reflections on the practice of clinical supervision in a social constructionist orientation. (2025). Psicologia USP, 36, e220147. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6564e220147