Cognitive, communicative and emotional deficits after a right hemispheric lesion: looking for the features of the Right Hemisphere Syndrome

Authors

  • Rochele Paz Fonseca Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul image/svg+xml
  • Gabriela Damasceno Ferreira Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul image/svg+xml
  • Francéia Veiga Liedtke Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul image/svg+xml
  • Juliana de Lima Müller Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul image/svg+xml
  • Thaís Ferrugem Sarmento Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul image/svg+xml
  • Maria Alice de Mattos Pimenta Parente Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-65642006000400013

Keywords:

Neuropsychology, Cognition, Communication, Emotion, Right hemisphere

Abstract

The group of signs and symptoms observed after a right hemisphere damage can be called Right Hemisphere Syndrome & RHS. This paper aims to present a description of the mentioned neuropsychological pathology. Cognitive deficits, such as disorders of attention and perception (anosognosia, hemineglect and prosopagnosia), memory (visual and spatial amnesia and working memory disorder), praxis (constructional disability) and executive functions (executive dysfunctions) characterize the RHS. When it comes to communicative abilities, the RHS is characterized by discoursive, pragmatic, lexical-semantic and prosodic deficits. Emotional disorders include inaccurate emotions comprehension and production from facial expressions and vocal intonation; besides these deficits, there are neuropsychiatric symptoms. However, a great heterogeneity in RHS manifestation is observed. For a deeper knowledge of RHS, it is necessary to promote more single case and group studies with the right brain damaged population.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Published

2006-01-01

How to Cite

Cognitive, communicative and emotional deficits after a right hemispheric lesion: looking for the features of the Right Hemisphere Syndrome. (2006). Psicologia USP, 17(4), 241-262. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-65642006000400013