Utopia e sociabilidade: imagens de sofrimento e caridade no Juazeiro do Norte
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-77012003000100005Keywords:
gift, moral sentiments, messianic expectationAbstract
This article provides a discussion on how images of charity are related to an ideal image of society - a Utopia. By going deeper into the relation between images of suffering, poverty and mendicancy I explore how a group of penitents ''the Ave de Jesus'' from Juazeiro Norte creates a sociality based on generosity, hospitality and sharing whereby they realise a messianic expectation. The major argument leads to a more general discussion of the bases of social life, the material on the Ave de Jesus serving to stress the significance of sociality based on charity and a whole complex organized around it that challenges some classical athropological theory on gift-reciprocity.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2003-01-01
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Authors who intend to publish in this journal must agree with the following terms:
- a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication. The work is simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows the work to be shared as long as the author and the initial publication in this journal are appropriately credited.
- b) Authors are authorized to sign additional contracts for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., to publish it as a book chapter), as long as the author and the initial publication in this journal are appropriately credited.
- c) Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. on their personal webpage) after the editorial process, for this can generate productive changes as well as increase the impact and citation of the work. See The Effect of Open Access Publications.
How to Cite
Campos, R. B. C. (2003). Utopia e sociabilidade: imagens de sofrimento e caridade no Juazeiro do Norte . Revista De Antropologia, 46(1), 211-250. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-77012003000100005