A propósito de la jurema. Reflexiones sobre el campo religioso brasileño
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-77012005000200001Keywords:
popular religiosity, catimbó, jurema, umbanda, religious studiesAbstract
Taking two Jurema ritual ceremonies as the starting point, this study concentrates on the analysis of some issues regarding the Brazilian religious universe. The main aspects brought into focus are, basically, the interactions between religious agencies and scholarly sectors interested in the study of marginal, secondary religions; the agencies networks - their cohesiveness, the various crossing paths they allow, the bonds between agents of different legitimacy etc.; the search for an operational value for syncretism; the homogenization of the universe, namely, the assimilation of rituals based on weak logical systems by rituals based on strong logical systems.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2005-01-01
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Authors who intend to publish in this journal must agree with the following terms:
- a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication. The work is simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows the work to be shared as long as the author and the initial publication in this journal are appropriately credited.
- b) Authors are authorized to sign additional contracts for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., to publish it as a book chapter), as long as the author and the initial publication in this journal are appropriately credited.
- c) Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. on their personal webpage) after the editorial process, for this can generate productive changes as well as increase the impact and citation of the work. See The Effect of Open Access Publications.
How to Cite
Brumana, F. G. (2005). A propósito de la jurema. Reflexiones sobre el campo religioso brasileño. Revista De Antropologia, 48(2), 423-471. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-77012005000200001