Online Submission
Submission of original manuscripts
|
Manuscripts must be submitted through the ScholarOne system Rights and Permission RC&F does not charge a fee for submitting articles. The submission of an article(s) to RC&F implies the authorization of the author(s) for its publication, without payment of copyright. |
|
Target public Publication ethics policy The ethics policy controls the relationships between the various agents in the publication of scientific articles. It is not intended to exhaust the subject, but address the most relevant aspects, also operational, in the relationship between editors, authors, reviewers, readers, and the community as a whole. In this sense, it is in line with guidelines from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) which is an active member, the Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), the Sao Paulo State Research Foundation (FAPESP), and the Brazilian National Association of Research and Graduate Studies in Administration (ANPAD). It is divided into: Copyright Upon acceptance of an article, authors will be asked to complete the “Statement of Original Authorship” and “License for Reproducing and Translating a Copyrighted Work.” Creative Commons The use of a Creative Commons license and CC-BY, always giving credit to the authors and the journal with regard to the research. Research funding When the research that has led to the submitted article is funded by some organization, this fact should be informed by the authors at the time of submitting the paper, in the system ScholarOne. Conflict of interest If there is any conflict of interest between authors and any other person or entity, it should be informed by the authors at the time of submitting the paper, in the system ScholarOne. Inadequate practices In the case of identifying any potential misconduct, such as redundancy, plagiarism, problems regarding the use of databases, conflicts between authors, unexplained conflicts of interest, among others, once unsolved, should be discussed by the editors group. If this fails to solve the issue, a commission from the editors will be created to assess and decide on the issue and its existence and solution shall be reported to the Editorial Board. Internal politics will guide the sequence. In case of any doubts, the authors shall ask the Review by e-mail to the Editor-In-Chief. Guidelines for authors, reviewers, and editors Peer review, in all of its forms, plays a key role in the process to ensure the quality and integrity of academic research. This process largely depends on trust, and it requires that all individuals involved act in a responsible and ethical manner. The Ethical Guidelines of COPE for External Reviewers establish the basic principles and standards to which all reviewers must adhere in the peer review process (http://publicationethics.org). Guidance for cases of data human collection through surveys, interview and experiments In cases of human data collection through surveys, interview and experiments it is essential for the authors to request consent to use the data before the answers are given. Similarly, it is essential for the researchers to keep the individual’s data confidential from any other agents. The researchers are entirely responsible for the storage and destination of the data and should ensure they are kept confidential. To check our complete publication ethics policy, please access http://rcf.fea.usp.br/index.php/cope2/ Guidelines for Systematic Review Articles Accounting & Finance Review (Revista Contabilidade & Finanças) accepts articles that carry out systematic reviews or meta-analyses on topics aligned with the journal’s scope. Bibliometric articles, as well as those limited to descriptive or purely conceptual literature reviews, do not fall within the scope of the publication. Review articles must include a literature review section that offers adequate contextualization of the study, clarifies existing knowledge and gaps in the field, and justifies the need for the review itself. This section contributes to defining the scope of the research, guiding methodological choices (such as inclusion criteria and search strategies), and demonstrating the authors’ expertise in the field. While generally more concise than in empirical articles, it is crucial for structuring the research question and guiding the entire review process. Review articles must adhere to the same methodological rigor required for empirical articles. This includes a detailed description of the search strategy and databases used, as well as explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria for the studies analyzed. The methodology should be transparent and replicable, allowing for rigorous data extraction, synthesis, and analysis. Furthermore, the study should clearly answer the research question, identifying patterns and gaps that may guide future investigations. It is important to note that review articles should not be limited to mapping and summarizing key studies on a topic. A critical analysis of the literature is expected—one that identifies gaps, contradictions, and opportunities for advancing knowledge. Authors are encouraged to consider previous reviews on the same topic in order to highlight relevant additional contributions. The review should emphasize its theoretical and practical/social implications, indicating how the generated knowledge can be synthesized to offer a new understanding of the field—whether through a theoretical model linking key variables, a novel perspective, or an original critique—and how this knowledge can be applied by organizations in addressing social challenges. The formatting of review articles must follow the same editorial guidelines required for empirical articles published by RC&F, including text structure, citation and reference style, length limits, and other editorial requirements. Guidelines for manuscript submission
|
Manuscript form and preparation
|
Structure As a general rule, manuscripts should be structured as follows:
Results and contributions:
Format:
Tutorials on Standards of the American Psychological Association (APA) available at: https://apastyle.apa.org/6th-edition-resources |
updated: 25/05/2022


