Biowaiver requirements based on the Biopharmaceutical Classification System in Brazil and worldwide

Authors

  • Valéria Sant'Anna Dantas Esteves Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde. Rio de Janeiro/RJ, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8318-5968
  • Laís Bastos da Fonseca, Dra. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro/RJ, Brazil
  • Kátia Christina Leandro, Dra. Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde. Rio de Janeiro/RJ, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1151-7358

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2316-9044.rdisan.2021.165557

Keywords:

Biowaiver, Dipyrone, Biopharmaceutical Classification System, Health Surveillance, Pharmaceutical equivalence

Abstract

Access to medicines can be facilitated by global pharmaceutical development programs, but there is a need for regulatory agencies and the pharmochemical and pharmaceutical industries to interact and to have a consensus on the requirements for drug registration. This article examined the specific legislation concerning to biowaiver based on the  Biopharmaceutical Classification System, comparing the scenario in Brazil and worldwide. Based on this analysis, it identified the obstacles to the application of international criteria in the national regulatory reality, identifying some weaknesses of the legislation, as in the case of prodrugs.  The criteria of five regulatory bodies (European Medicines Agency, Food and Drug Administration, Health Canada, International Council for Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use and World Health Organization) were analyzed in relation to the requirements of the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa), pointing out the differences and what has already been settled regarding the accepted class of the Biopharmaceutical Classification System, the comparability between test and reference formulations, solubility, intestinal permeability and in vitro dissolution profile. It was concluded that Anvisa should internalize the percepts and criteria of the biowaiver based on Biopharmaceutical Classification System, through a new regulatory framework. Moreover, for this regulatory framework to be successful and produce tangible results, especially in the area of public health and health surveillance, Anvisa must be open to dialogue with the regulated sector and to innovations and guidance from academia, without losing focus of its institutional mission.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Valéria Sant'Anna Dantas Esteves, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde. Rio de Janeiro/RJ, Brazil

    PhD candidate in Health Surveillance at the Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde of the Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (INCQS/Fiocruz); Master in Public Health by the Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública (ENSP/Fiocruz); undergraduate in Pharmacy from the Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ).

  • Laís Bastos da Fonseca, Dra., Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro/RJ, Brazil

    PhD in Chemical Engineering from the Instituto Alberto Luiz Coimbra for Graduate Studies and Engineering Research of the Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ); Master in Pharmaceutical Sciences from the Faculdade de Farmácia da UFRJ; undergraduate degree in Pharmacy from UFRJ

  • Kátia Christina Leandro, Dra., Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde. Rio de Janeiro/RJ, Brazil

    PhD in Analytical Chemistry from the Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio); degree in Chemistry from Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF). Professor of the Graduate Program in Health Surveillance at the Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde of the Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (INCQS/Fiocruz). Member of the Multiprofessional Residency Committee, INCQS/Fiocruz

References

AGÊNCIA NACIONAL DE VIGILÂNCIA SANITÁRIA – ANVISA. Agenda regulatória 2017-2020. Brasília-DF: Anvisa, 2017. Disponível em: http://portal.anvisa.gov.br/2017-2020. Acesso em: 20 dez. 2019.

AGÊNCIA NACIONAL DE VIGILÂNCIA SANITÁRIA - ANVISA. Institucional. Disponível em: http://portal.anvisa.gov.br/institucional. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2019.

AMIDON, Gordon L. et al. A theoretical basis for a Biopharmaceutic Drug Classification: the correlation of in vitro drug product dissolution and in vivo bioavailability. Pharmaceutical Research, v. 12, n. 3, p. 413-420, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/ A%3A1016212804288. Acesso em: 24 ago. 2013.

AULTON, Michael E.; TAYLOR, Kevin M. G. (Ed.). Aulton's pharmaceutics: the design and manufacture of medicines. 5. ed. England: Elsevier, 2018.

BENET, Leslie Z.; BROCCATELLI, Fabio; OPREA, Tudor I. BDDCS applied to over 900 drugs. The AAPS Journal, v. 13, n. 4, p. 519–547, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-011-9290-9. Acesso em: 15 jan. 2019.

BLUME, Henning H.; SCHUG, Barbara S. The biopharmaceutics classification system (BCS): Class III drugs - better candidates for BA/BE waiver? European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, v. 9, n. 2, p. 117-121, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-0987(99)00076-7. Acesso em: 24 nov. 2018.

BOU-CHACRA, Nadia et al. Evolution of choice of solubility and dissolution media after two decades of Biopharmaceutical Classification System. The AAPS Journal, v. 19, n. 4, p. 989-1001, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-017-0085-5. Acesso em: 24 nov. 2018.

BUTLER, James M.; DRESSMAN, Jennifer B. The developability classification system: application of biopharmaceutics concepts to formulation development. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, v. 99, n. 12, p. 4940-4954, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.22217. Acesso em: 14 nov. 2018.

CARDOT, J. M. et al. Implementing the additional strength biowaiver for generics: EMA recommended approaches and challenges for a US-FDA submission. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, v. 111, p. 399-408, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2017.10.013. Acesso em: 18 dez. 2018.

CARDOT, J. M. et al. Implementing the Biopharmaceutics Classification System in drug development: reconciling similarities, differences, and shared challenges in the EMA and US-FDA-Recommended Approaches. The AAPS Journal, v. 18, n. 4, p. 1039-1046, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1208/s12248-016-9915-0. Acesso em: 14 nov. 2018.

CHENG, Ching-Lin et al. Biowaiver extension potential to BCS Class III high solubility-low permeability drugs: bridging evidence for metformin immediate-release tablet. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, v. 22, n. 4, p. 297-304, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2004.03.016. Acesso em: 15 dez. 2018.

CHILUKURI, Dakshina Murthy; SUNKARA, Gangadhar; YOUNG, David (Ed.). Pharmaceutical product development. New York: Informa Healthcare USA, Inc., 2007.

COOK, Jack. Impact of discordance among regulations for biopharmaceutics classification system based waivers of clinical bioequivalence studies. Dissolution Technologies, v. 22, n. 2, p. 6-10, 2015. Disponível em: http://dissolutiontech.com/DTresour/201505Articles/DT201505_A01.pdf. dx.doi.org/10.14227/DT220215P6.

DAHAN, Arik; LENNERNÄS, Hans; AMIDON, Gordon L. The fraction dose absorbed, in humans, and high jejunal human permeability relationship. Molecular pharmaceutics, v. 9, n. 6, p. 1847-1851, 2012. https://dx.doi.org/10.1021%2Fmp300140h. Acesso em: 10 jan. 2019.

DAVIT, Barbara M. et al. BCS biowaivers: similarities and differences among EMA, FDA, and WHO requirements. The AAPS Journal, n. 3, v. 18, p. 612–618, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-016-9877-2. Acesso em: 15 out. 2018.

DRESSMAN, J. (Ed.). Biowaiver monographs 2004-2018. Holanda: FIP, 2018.

ESTEVES, Valéria Sant’Anna Dantas. Bioisenção com base no Sistema de Classificação Biofarmacêutica (SCB) no cenário regulatório brasileiro e mundial: uma análise a partir do estudo da Dipirona sódica comprimido simples de 500 mg. 2019. Tese (Doutorado) – Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro-RJ, 2019.

EUROPEAN MEDICINES AGENCY. Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). Guideline on the investigation of bioequivalence. 2010. Disponível em: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2010/01/WC500070039.pdf. Acesso em: 17 jul. 2016.

GOVERNMET OF CANADA. Health Canada. Guidance document: Biopharmaceutics Classification System based biowaiver. 2014. Disponível em: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-health-products/drug-products/applications-submissions/guidance-documents/biopharmaceutics-classification-system-based-biowaiver.html. Acesso em: 24 nov. 2018.

HANDOO, Shweta et al. A comprehensive study on regulatory requirements for development and filing of generic drugs globally. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation, v. 2, n. 3, p. 99-105, 2012. Disponível em: http://www.jpionline.org/temp/PharmInvestigations2399-3265395_090413.pdf. Acesso em: 24 nov. 2018.

HOFSÄSS, Martin A.; DRESSMAN, Jennifer B. The discriminatory power of the BCS-based biowaiver: a retrospective with focus on essential medicines. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, v. 108, n. 9, p. 2824-2837, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xphs.2019.04.030. Acesso em: 24 nov. 2019.

INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR HARMONISATION OF TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR PHARMACEUTICALS FOR HUMAN USE (ICH). ICH Harmonised Guideline. Biopharmaceutics Classification System-Based Biowaivers M9, Final version. 2018. Disponível em: https://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/M9_Guideline_Step4_2019_1116.pdf. Acesso em: 19 dez. 2019.

KUBBINGA, Marlies; MOGHANI, Laura; LANGGUTH, Peter. Novel insights into excipient effects on the biopharmaceutics of APIs from different BCS classes: Lactose in solid oral dosage forms. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, v. 61, p. 27-31, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2014.03.008. Acesso em: 24 nov. 2018.

LAHMANN, Walker Magalhães et al. Stable oral pharmaceutical composition. U.S. Patent Application, n. 15/105, 299, 3. nov. 2016.

LENNERNÄS, Hans. Modeling gastrointestinal drug absorption requires more in vivo biopharmaceutical data: experience from in vivo dissolution and permeability studies in humans. Current Drug Metabolism, v. 8, n. 7, p. 645-657, 2007. https://doi.org/10.2174/138920007782109823. Acesso em: 24 nov. 2018.

LENNERNÄS, Hans. Regional intestinal drug permeation: Biopharmaceutics and drug development. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, v. 57, p. 333-341, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2013.08.025. Acesso em: 24 nov. 2018.

PAN AMERICAN HEALTH ORGANIZATION - PAHO. Framework for implementation of equivalence requirements for pharmaceutical products. Washington: PAHO, 2011. (PANDRH Technical Report n. 8). Disponível em: http://iris.paho.org/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/31220/9789275132227-eng.PDF?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. Acesso em: 18 set. 2018.

PARR, Alan et al. The effect of excipients on the permeability of BCS Class III compounds and implications for biowaivers. Pharmaceutical Research, v. 33, n. 1, p. 167-176, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11095-015-1773-4. Acesso em: 18 set. 2018.

PEREIRA, Dárcio Gomes. Importância do metabolismo no planejamento de fármacos. Química Nova, v. 30, n. 1, p. 171-177, 2007. http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-40422007000100029&lng=en&nrm=iso. Acesso em: 22 abr. 2019.

STORPIRTIS, S. et al. Biofarmacotécnica. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan, 2008.

TAYLOR, John B.; TRIGGLE, David J. Comprehensive Medicinal Chemistry II. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2007. Disponível em: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/referenceworks/9780080450445. Acesso em: 17 set. 2018.

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Guidance for industry: waiver of in vivo bioavailability and bioequivalence studies for immediate-release solid oral dosage forms based on a Biopharmaceutics Classification System. 2017. Disponível em: http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM070246.pdf. Acesso em: 17 fev. 2018.

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Waiver of in vivo bioavailability and bioequivalence studies for immediate-release solid oral dosage forms based on a Biopharmaceutics Classification System. 2015. Disponível em: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceCompliance RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM070246.pdf. Acesso em: 24 nov. 2018.

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Dissolution testing and specification criteria for immediate release solid oral dosage forms containing BCS class 1 and class 3 drugs. 2015. Disponível em: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM456594.pdf. Acesso em: 24 nov. 2018.

TSUME, Yasuhiro; AMIDON, Gordon L. The biowaiver extension for BCS class III drugs: the effect of dissolution rate on the bioequivalence of BCS class III immediate-release drugs predicted by computer simulation. Molecular Pharmaceutics, v. 7, n. 4, p. 1235-1243, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1021/mp100053q. Acesso em: 15 dez. 2018.

UNGELL, A.-L. et al. Membrane transport of drugs in different regions of the intestinal tract of the rat. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, v. 87, n. 3, p. 360-366, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1021/js970218s. Acesso em: 15 out. 2018.

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION – WHO. General notes on biopharmaceutics classification system (BCS)-based biowaiver applications. WHO: Genebra, 2014. Disponível em: https://extranet.who.int/pqweb/sites/default/files/documents/35%20Biowaiver%20general_March2019_newtempl.pdf. Acesso em: 24 nov. 2018.

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION – WHO. Multisource (Generic) pharmaceutical products: guidelines on registration requirements to establish interchangeability. 2015. (WHO Technical Report Series n. 992, annex 7). Disponível em: http://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/documents/s21898en/ s21898en.pdf. Acesso em: 24 nov. 2018.

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION – WHO. Multisource (generic) pharmaceutical products: guidelines on registration requirements to establish interchangeability. 2017. (WHO Technical Report Series, n. 1003, annex 6). Disponível em: http://www.gmp-compliance.org/guidemgr/files/who_trs1003_annex6.pdf. Acesso em: 17 fev. 2018.

YU, Lawrence X. et al. Biopharmaceutics classification system: the scientific basis for biowaiver extensions. Pharmaceutical Research, v. 19, n. 7, p. 921-925, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1016473601633. Acesso em: 17 fev. 2018.

Published

2021-12-08

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Esteves, V. S. D., Fonseca, L. B. da, & Leandro, K. C. (2021). Biowaiver requirements based on the Biopharmaceutical Classification System in Brazil and worldwide. Journal of Health Law, 21, e0023. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2316-9044.rdisan.2021.165557