Os contenciosos na OMC como instrumento de abertura de mercados agrícolas
— reflexão e provocação
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.0102-8049.ip201-226Palavras-chave:
Medidas compensatórias, regime de importação, Tratamento preferencial, antidumping, Classificação alfandegária, multilateralismo, regime gerencial, cláusula de pazResumo
-
Downloads
Referências
ABBOTT, Kenneth W.; SNIDAL, Duncan. Why states act through formal international organizations. Journal of Conflict Resolution, v. 42, n. 1, p. 3–32, 1998.
BENKE, Rafael Tiago Juk. Brazilian agricultural exports: internal and external barriers. Inglaterra: University of Warwick, 2002.
BHALA, Raj. The power of the pasta: towards de jure stare decisis in WTO adjudication. George Washington International Law Review, v. 33, p. 873–978, 2001.
BRONCKERS, Marco. Private response to foreign unfair trade practices: United States and EEC complaint procedures. Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business, p. 651–695, 1984.
CHAMBOVEY, Didier. How the expiry of the peace clause (Article 13 of the WTO Agreement on Agriculture) might alter disciplines on agricultural subsidies in the WTO framework. Journal of World Trade, v. 36, n. 2, p. 305–352, 2002.
CHAYES, Abram; CHAYES, Antonia Handler. The new sovereignty: compliance with international regulatory agreements. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1995.
DAVEY, William J. Dispute settlement in GATT. Fordham International Law Journal, p. 51–78, 1987.
GARDNER, Richard N. Sterling-dollar diplomacy: Anglo-American collaboration in the reconstruction of multilateral trade. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
HART, H. L. A. The concept of law. 2. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.
HENKIN, Louis. How nations behave. 2. ed. New York: Columbia University Press, 1979.
HUDEC, Robert E. Enforcing international trade law: the evolution of the modern GATT legal system. Salem: Butterworth Legal Publishers, 1993.
HUDEC, Robert E. GATT dispute settlement after the Tokyo Round: an unfinished business. Cornell International Law Journal, v. 13, p. 145–159, 1980.
HUDEC, Robert E. Reforming GATT adjudication procedures: the lessons of the DISC case. Minnesota Law Review, v. 72, p. 1443–1510, 1988.
HUDEC, Robert E. The GATT legal system and world trade diplomacy. New York: Praeger, 1975.
HUDEC, Robert E. Thinking about the new Section 301: beyond good and evil. In: BHAGWATI, Jagdish; PATRICK, Hugh T. (eds.). Aggressive unilateralism: America's 301 trade policy and the world trade system. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1990.
ÍCONE – Instituto de Estudos do Comércio e Negociações Internacionais. O fim da cláusula de paz e os subsídios agrícolas na OMC: análise dos impactos para os interesses comerciais brasileiros perante a OMC. DT 005/03.
JACKSON, John H. The world trading system. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1997.
KEOHANE, Robert O. After hegemony: cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.
KEOHANE, Robert O.; MORAVCSIK, Andrew; SLAUGHTER, Anne-Marie. Legalized dispute resolution: interstate and transnational. International Organization, v. 54, n. 3, p. 457–488, 2000.
KIRGIS JR., Frederic L. International organizations in their legal setting. St. Paul: West Publishing, 1993.
KOH, Harold Hongju. Why do nations obey international law? Yale Law Journal, v. 106, p. 2599–2659, 1997.
LITVAK, Uri. Regional integration and the dispute resolution system of the World Trade Organization after the Uruguay Round: a proposal for the future. University of Miami Inter-American Law Review, p. 561–590.
MATSUSHITA, Mitsuo; SCHOENBAUM, Thomas J.; MAVROIDIS, Petros C. The World Trade Organization: law, practice and policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
MEDRADO, René Guilherme S. Re-negotiating remedies in the WTO: a multilateral approach. Wisconsin International Law Journal, 2004.
BRASIL. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. Balança comercial do agronegócio – dezembro de 2003. Brasília.
ORGANIZAÇÃO MUNDIAL DO COMÉRCIO. Update of WTO dispute settlement cases. WT/DS/OV/19, 6 fev. 2004.
PALMETER, David. The WTO as a legal system. Fordham International Law Journal, v. 24, p. 444–463, 2000.
ROMANO, Cesare. The proliferation of international institutions: the pieces of the puzzle. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, v. 31, p. 709–751, 1999.
SHOYER, Andrew W.; SOLOVY, Eric M.; KOFF, Alexander W. Implementation and enforcement of the WTO agreements. In: Kluwer companion to the World Trade Organization. Haia: Kluwer Law International.
STEIN, Arthur A. Coordination and collaboration: regimes in an anarchic world. In: KRASNER, Stephen D. (ed.). International regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1982.
STEINBERG, Richard H.; JOSLING, Timothy E. When the peace ends: the vulnerability of EC and US agricultural subsidies to WTO legal challenge. Journal of International Economic Law, v. 6, n. 2, p. 369–417.
SYKES, Alan O. Constructive unilateral threats in international commercial relations: the limited case for Section 301. Law and Policy in International Business, v. 23, p. 263–316, 1992.
TRACHTMAN, Joel P. The domain of WTO dispute resolution. Harvard International Law Journal, v. 40, p. 333–377, 1999.
WILLIAMSON, Oliver E. The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press, 1985.
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Direitos autorais (c) 2026 Renê Guilherme S. Medrado
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
