Work environment of nurses in primary health care in Manaus: an analytical cross-sectional study

Authors

  • Lucas Lorran Costa de Andrade Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Departamento de Enfermagem, Florianópolis, SC, Brasil. - Universidade Federal do Amazonas, Departamento de Saúde Coletiva, Manaus, AM, Brasil.
  • Laura Cavalcanti de Farias Brehmer Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Departamento de Enfermagem, Florianópolis, SC, Brasil.
  • Elisiane Lorenzini Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Departamento de Enfermagem, Florianópolis, SC, Brasil.
  • Sabrina Blasius Faust Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Departamento de Enfermagem, Florianópolis, SC, Brasil.
  • Wagner Ferreira Monteiro Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Departamento de Enfermagem, Manaus, AM, Brasil.
  • Letícia de Lima Trindade Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Departamento de Enfermagem, Chapecó, SC, Brasil.
  • Ronilson Ferreira Freitas Universidade Federal do Amazonas, Departamento de Saúde Coletiva, Manaus, AM, Brasil.
  • Flávia Regina Souza Ramos Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Departamento de Enfermagem, Florianópolis, SC, Brasil. - Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Departamento de Enfermagem, Manaus, AM, Brasil.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2025-0280pt

Keywords:

Primary Health Care, Work, Health Facility Environment, Nurses

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the dimensions of the work environment of primary health care nurses (PHC) and its relationship with these professionals’ sociodemographic characteristics. Method: This was a cross-sectional, analytical study conducted between April and October 2024 with 243 PHC nurses in Manaus. A questionnaire and the Workplace Environment Assessment Scale were used. Descriptive and inferential analysis was performed. Results: The overall assessment of the work environment was average, with a score of 98.1. The average score for the Motivation for Work dimension was 47.2. The Workplace Safety dimension had the lowest average (14.6), classified as “attention”, and Strategic Management for Healthy Work, with an average of 36.3, was classified as having warning points. A negative correlation was found between income and motivation, length of time working in PHC and management, age/length of work and job security. Temporary nurses evaluated strategic management more positively. Conclusion: Weaknesses were identified in security and strategic management, highlighting the need for improvements in infrastructure, participatory management, and protection of professionals’ health to promote a safer and healthier work environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Published

2026-03-06

Issue

Section

Original Article

How to Cite

Andrade, L. L. C. de, Brehmer, L. C. de F., Lorenzini, E., Faust, S. B., Monteiro, W. F., Trindade, L. de L., Freitas, R. F., & Ramos, F. R. S. (2026). Work environment of nurses in primary health care in Manaus: an analytical cross-sectional study. Revista Da Escola De Enfermagem Da USP, 60, e20250280. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2025-0280pt