Genealogy in the development of ancient historiography: Genealogy and history in Herodotus
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2316-9141.rh.2022.180558Palabras clave:
Herodotus, Ancient historiography, Genealogy, Rhetoric, TekmerionResumen
In this article, I suggest that genealogy was a rhetorical strategy to build authority in the ancient history writing. In this way, I divide my argument into four parts. Firstly, I present my understanding of genealogy and authority, as these concepts orient my selection and analysis of the evidence. Secondly, I turn to the genealogical evidence, trying to demonstrate its relation with controversial debates and its role as a rhetorical tool. For this, I compare Herodotus’ and Isocrates’ use of genealogy, and suggest that genealogy was a form of tekmerion. Thirdly, I try to substantiate this hypothesis by looking at both Aristotle’s definition of tekmerion and to what extent Herodotus and Isocrates share his understanding of this word. Finally, I present considerations about why genealogy was such a powerful rhetorical resource in discourses of various nature, history included.
Descargas
Referencias
AUGER, Danièle. Arbre généalogique et plant de vigne. In: AUGER, Danièle; SAÏD, Suzanne (dir.) Généalogies mythiques: Actes du VIIIe Colloque du Centre de Recherches Mythologiques de l’Université de Paris-X. Paris: Centre de Recherches Mythologiques, 1998, p. 87-118.
BALL, Rashid. Generation dating in Herodotus. Classical Quarterly. Vol. 29, n. 2, 1979, p. 276-281.
BARAGWANATH, Emily; BAKKER, Mathieu de (ed.) Myth, Truth and Narrative in Herodotus. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
BOEDEKER, Deborah. The two faces of Demaratus. Arethusa. Vol. 20, 1987, p. 185-201.
BOER, Willem den. The struggle for the chronological pattern. In: Laconian Studies. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company, 1954, p. 1-150.
BRUNSCHWIG, Jacques. Aristotle’s rhetoric as a ‘counterpart’ to dialectic. In: RORTY, Amélie Oksenberg (ed.) Essays on Aristotle’s Rhetoric. Berkeley/London: University of California Press, 1996, p. 34-55.
BURNYEAT, Myles. Enthymeme: Aristotle on the rationality of rhetoric. In: RORTY, Amélie Oksenberg (ed.) Essays on Aristotle’s Rhetoric. Berkeley/London: University of California Press, 1996, p. 88-115.
CAREY, Christopher. ‘Artless’ proof in Aristotle and the orators. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies. Vol. 39, 1994a, p. 95-106.
CAREY, Christopher. Rhetorical means of persuasion. In: WORTHINGTON, Ian (ed.) Persuasion: Greek Rhetoric in Action. London: Routledge, 1994b, p. 26-45.
CAREY, Christopher. Rhetorical means of persuasion. In: RORTY, Amélie Oksenberg (ed.) Essays on Aristotle’s Rhetoric. Berkeley/London: University of California Press, 1996, p. 399-415.
CARRIÈRE, Jean-Claude. Du mythe à l’histoire. Généalogies heróïques, chronologies légendaires et historicisation des mythes. In: AUGER, Danièle; SAÏD, Suzanne (dir.) Généalogies mythiques: Actes du VIIIe Colloque du Centre de Recherches Mythologiques de l’Université de Paris-X. Paris: Centre de Recherches Mythologiques, 1998, p. 47-85.
CARSTEN, Janet. After Kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
CARTLEDGE, Paul. Appendix 3: The Spartan king-lists. In: Sparta and Lakonia. A Regional History 1300 to 362 BC. 1st edition 1979. London/New York: Routledge, 2002, p. 293-298.
CHIASSON, Charles. Myth and truth in Herodotus’ Cyrus logos. In: BARAGWANATH, Emily; BAKKER, Mathieu de (ed.) Myth, Truth and Narrative in Herodotus. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012, p. 213-232.
CINGANO, Ettore. A catalogue within a catalogue: Helen’s suitors in the Hesiodic Catalogue of Women (frr.196-204). In: HUNTER, Richard (ed.) The Hesiodic Catalogue of Women: Constructions and Reconstructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005, p. 118-152.
CRANE, Gregory. The Blinded Eye: Thucydides and the New Written Word. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 1996.
DARBO-PESCHANSKI, Catherine. Le discours du particulier: Essai sur l’enquête hérodotéenne. Paris: Seuil, 1987.
DETIENNE, Marcel. The Masters of Truth in Archaic Greece. English Translation by J. Lloyd. 1st French Edition 1967. New York: Zone Books, 1996.
DREWS, Robert. The fall of Astyages and Herodotus’ chronology of the Eastern Kingdoms. Historia. Vol. 18, n. 1, 1969, p. 1-11.
FOXHALL, Lin. The politics of affection: Emotional attachments in Athenian society. In: CARTLEDGE, Paul; MILLETT, Paul; REDEN, Sitta von (ed.) Kosmos: Essays in Order, Conflict and Community in Classical Athens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998, p. 52-67.
FOWLER, Robert. Mythos and logos. Journal of Hellenic Studies. Vol. 131, 2011, p. 45-66.
FOWLER, Robert. Early Greek Mythography. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, vol. 2.
FRAGOULAKI, Maria. Kinship in Thucydides: Intercommunal Ties and Historical Narrative. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
FRITZ, Kurt von. Herodotus and the growth of Greek historiography. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association. Vol. 67, 1936, p. 315-340.
GOTTELAND, Sophie. Généalogies mythiques et politique chez les orateurs attiques. In: AUGER, Danièle; SAÏD, Suzanne (dir.) Généalogies mythiques: Actes du VIIIe Colloque du Centre de Recherches Mythologiques de l’Université de Paris-X. Paris: Centre de Recherches Mythologiques, 1998, p. 379-393.
GOTTELAND, Sophie. Mythe et rhétorique: Les exemples mythiques dans le discours politique de l’Athènes classique. Paris: Belles Lettres, 2001.
GRIMALDI, William. A Note on the pisteis in Aristotle’s Rhetoric, 1354-1356. American Journal of Philology. Vol. 78, n. 2, 1957, p. 188-192.
GRIMALDI, William. Semeion, tekmerion, eikos in Aristotle’s Rhetoric. American Journal of Philology. Vol. 101, n. 4, 1980, p. 383-398.
HEIDEL, William Arthur. Hecataeus and the Egyptian priests in Herodotus, Book II. Memoirs of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Vol. 18, n. 2, 1935, p. 53-134.
HOW, Walter Wybergh; WELLS, Joseph. A Commentary on Herodotus. 1st Edition 1912. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979, 2 vols.
IRWIN, Elizabeth. Gods among men? The social and political dynamics of the Hesiodic Catalogue of Women. In: HUNTER, Richard (ed.) The Hesiodic Catalogue of Women: Constructions and Reconstructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005, p. 35-84.
KRAUS, Manfred. How to classify means of persuasion: The Rhetoric to Alexander and Aristotle on pisteis. Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric. Vol. 29, n. 3, 2011, p. 263-279.
KURKE, Leslie. Herodotus and Aesop: Some soundings. In: Aesopic Conversations: Popular Tradition, Cultural Dialogue and the Invention of Greek Prose. Princeton, N.J./Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2011, p. 398-431.
LIMA, Paulo Butti de. L’inchiesta e la prova: Immagine storiografica, pratica giuridica e retorica nella Grecia classica. Turin: Einaudi, 1996.
MARINCOLA, John. Rethinking Isocrates and historiography. In: PARMEGIANNI, Giovanni. Between Thucydides and Polybius: The Golden Age of Greek Historiography. Hellenic Studies Series 64. Washington, DC: Center for Hellenic Studies, 2014. Available online: <https://www.chs.harvard.edu/CHS/article/display/5851.giovanni-parmeggiani-ed-between-thucydides-and-polybius-the-golden-age-of-greek-historiography>. Access date: 24 May 2017.
MARTIN, Richard. The Language of Heroes: Speech and Performance in the Iliad. Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press, 1989.
MCADON, Brad. Probabilities, signs, necessary signs, idia, and topoi: The confusing discussion of materials for enthymemes in the Rhetoric. Philosophy & Rhetoric. Vol. 36, n. 3, 2003, p. 223-247.
MEYER, Eduard. Herodots Chronologie der Griechischen Sagengeschichte. In: Forschungen zur Alten Geschichte. 1st edition 1892. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010, p. 153-188.
MILLER, Molly. Herodotus as chronographer. Klio. Vol. 46, 1965, p. 109-128
MITCHEL, Fordyce. Herodotus’ use of genealogical chronology. Phoenix. Vol. 10, n. 2, 1956, p. 48-69.
MOYER, Ian. Herodotus and an Egyptian mirage: The genealogies of the Theban priests. Journal of Hellenic Studies. Vol. 122, 2002, p. 70-90.
MOYER, Ian. Herodotus and an Egyptian mirage. In: Egypt and the Limits of Hellenism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011, p. 42-83.
MURRAY, Oswyn. Herodotus and oral history; Herodotus and oral history reconsidered. In: LURAGHI, Nino (ed.) The Historian’s Craft in the Age of Herodotus. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001, p. 16-44, 314-325.
NENCI, Giuseppe. Commento VI, 125-131. In: Erodoto. Le Storie Libro VI. La Battaglia di Maratona. Roma/Milan: Fondazione Lorenzo Valla/Arnoldo Mondadori, 1998, p. 304-311.
PAPILLON, Terry. Isocrates and the Greek poetic tradition. Scholia. Vol. 7, 1998, p. 41-61.
PELETZ, Michael. Kinship studies in late twentieth-century anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology. Vol. 24, 1995, p. 343-372.
PELLING, Christopher. The urine and the vine: Astyages’ dreams at 1.107-8. Classical Quarterly. Vol. 46, 1996, p. 68-77.
PIAZZA, Francesca. Pisteis in comparison: Examples and enthymemes in the Rhetoric to Alexander and Aristotle’s Rhetoric. A Journal of the History of Rhetoric. Vol. 29, n. 3, 2011, p. 305-318.
PRAKKEN, Donald. Herodotus and the Spartan king lists. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association. Vol. 71, 1940, p. 460-472.
REGUERO, María del Carmen Encinas. La evolución de algunos conceptos retóricos. Semeion y tekmerion del s. V al IV a.C. Rhetorica. A Journal of the History of Rhetoric. Vol. 27, n. 4, 2009, p. 373-403.
RENAUD, Jean-Michel. La généalogie de Tydée et de Diomède. In: AUGER, Danièle; SAÏD, Suzanne (dir.) Généalogies mythiques: Actes du VIIIe Colloque du Centre de Recherches Mythologiques de l’Université de Paris-X. Paris: Centre de Recherches Mythologiques, 1998, p. 15-28.
RUTHERFORD, Ian. Mestra at Athens: Hesiod fr.43 and the poetics of PanHellenism. In: HUNTER, Richard (ed.) The Hesiodic Catalogue of Women: Constructions and Reconstructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005, p. 99-117.
THOMAS, Rosalind. Oral Tradition and Written Record in Classical Athens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
THOMAS, Rosalind. Herodotus in Context: Ethnography, Science and the Art of Persuasion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
THOMAS, Rosalind. Ethnicity, genealogy, and Hellenism in Herodotus. In: MALKIN, Irad (ed.) Ancient Perceptions of Greek Ethnicity. Washington, D.C./London: Centre for Hellenic Studies, Trustees for Harvard University, 2001a, p. 213-233.
THOMAS, Rosalind. Herodotus’ Histories and the floating gap. In: LURAGHI, Nino (ed.) The Historian’s Craft in the Age of Herodotus. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001b, p. 198-210.
VANDIVER, Elizabeth. Heroes in Herodotus: The Interaction of Myth and History. Frankfurt am Main: P. Lang, 1991.
VANNICELLI, Pietro. Herodotus’ Egypt and the foundations of universal history. In: LURAGHI, Nino (ed.) The Historian’s Craft in the Age of Herodotus. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001, p. 211-240.
VARTO, Emily. Early Greek Kinship. Vancouver: Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of British Columbia, 2009.
WADE-GERY, Henry Theodore. Herodotos’ date for Homer; ‘Stretched’ chronologies. In: The Poet of the Iliad. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1952, p. 25-29, 75-77.
WALKER, Jeffrey. The body of persuasion: A theory of the enthymeme. College English. Vol. 56, n. 1, 1994, p. 46-65.
WEST, Martin. The Hesiodic Catalogue of Women: Its Nature, Structure, and Origins. Oxford: Clarendon, 1985.
ZOGRAPHOU, Gerasimoula. Généalogie et historiographie: Une réécriture de la généalogie des rois de Sparte. Le cas de Démarate chez Hérodote. Kernos. Vol. 20, 2007, p. 189-204.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
- Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (CC BY). Esta licença permite que outros distribuam, remixem, adaptem e criem a partir do seu trabalho, mesmo para fins comerciais, desde que lhe atribuam o devido crédito pela criação original. É a licença mais flexível de todas as licenças disponíveis. É recomendada para maximizar a disseminação e uso dos materiais licenciados.
- Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).
