Past and present pest mitigation: insights from an international survey of practices

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2448-1750.revmae.2024.227497

Keywords:

Survey, Pesticides, Toxic treatments, Non-toxic treatments, Conservation

Abstract

Through a knowledge exchange network, many countries have developed similar timelines for using chemical substances to preserve collections in museums, libraries, and archives. To gather data on past treatment methods and current pest control practices, a survey was created. The goal was to identify the profile of toxic and non-toxic treatments used in various types of collections. The questionnaire was developed and applied to professionals working in cultural heritage preservation to identify both historical and current pest mitigation methods. The investigation aimed to determine if the traditional chemical treatments recommended by conservation manuals were widely adopted by professionals with different profiles and how current practices address pest-related issues in cultural heritage. This article presents and discusses the findings from this international survey.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Ana Carolina Delgado Vieira, Universidade de São Paulo. Museu de Arqueologia e Etnologia

    Conservator at the Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology (MAE-USP), PhD candidate in the Nuclear Technology 
    Graduate Program at the Institute for Energy and Nuclear Research – IPEN/US

  • Pablo Antonio Vasquez Salvador, Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares, IPEN–CNEN/SP

    Graduação em Engenharia Química - Escola Politécnica (1999), mestrado em ciências pela Universidade de São Paulo (2004) e doutorado em ciências pela Universidade de São Paulo e pela Washington University in St. Louis (2009). Pesquisador do Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares IPEN. Professor e orientador em nível mestrado e doutorado do Programa de Pós-graduação em Tecnologia Nuclear da Universidade de São Paulo-USP. Responsável pela linha de pesquisa e aplicação da radiação ionizante para preservação de bens culturais. Consultor da Agência Internacional de Energia Atômica AIEA para preservação de Patrimônio Cultural utilizando radiação ionizante. Pesquisador responsável/coordenador do Irradiador Multipropósito de Cobalto-60 do Centro de Tecnologia das Radiações CETER/IPEN. Aplicação e estudos da radiação ionizante para modificação de propriedades físico-químicas de materiais. Experiência na área de Engenharia Química, com ênfase na aplicação de radioisótopos na indústria para controle de qualidade e otimização de processos: gamma scanning, traçadores radioativos, tomografia computadorizada, detectores cintiladores, sistemas de controle nucleônico.

References

Almeida, T.H. 2021. Bibliotecários e cientistas versus insetos bibliófagos: o combate em acervos culturais. Museologia e Patrimônio - Revista Eletrônica do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Museologia e Patrimônio Unirio MAST, 14(2): 48-75. https://doi.org/10.52192/1984-3917.2021v14n2p48-75

Angelova, L.V. et al. 2023. The use of ‘poisonous insecticidal solutions’ in bookbinding: coping with historic pesticide treatments in the archive. Heritage Science, 11(51): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-023-00866-y

Arndt, L. 2022). Poisonous Heritage: Chemical conservation, monitored collections, and the threshold of ethnological museums. Museum and Society, 20(2): 282-301. https://doi.org/10.29311/mas.v20i2.4031

ATSDR – Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. 2023. Available at: https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/. Accessed on: 03/11/2023.

Carrasco, G.L. de A. (2004). Contaminação do acervo do arquivo histórico de Joinville por inseticidas organoclorados. Caderno Técnico APCR, 1: 50-53.

Clarke, S. 2012. Rethinking the Post-War Hegemony of DDT: Insecticides Research and the British Colonial Empire. In: Berridge, V.; Gorsky, m. (eds) Environment, Health and History. Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire, 133-153.

Cunha, C. da S.; Mattos, L. 2015. Tem um pó branco dentro do livro…. Revista Brasileira de Biblioteconomia e Documentação, 11: 147-162. Available at: https://rbbd.febab.org.br/rbbd/article/download/500/421. Accessed on: 28/07/2024.

Farber, P.L. 1976. The Type-Concept in Zoology during the First Half of the Nineteenth Century. Journal of the History of Biology, 9(1): 93-119. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4330645.pdf. Accessed on: 25/06/2023.

Gay, H. 2012. Before and After Silent Spring: From Chemical Pesticides to Biological Control and Integrated Pest Management — Britain, 1945–1980. Ambix, 59(2): 88-108. https://doi.org/10.1179/174582312X13345259995930

Goldberg, L.A. 1996. History of Pest Control Measures in the Anthropology Collections, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution. Journal of the American Institute for Conservation, 5(1): 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1179/019713696806124601

Hawks, C.; Makos, K. 2000. Inherent Hazards in Museum Collections. CRM, 5: 31-37. Available at: http://www.jorgealiaga.com.ar/documentos/gestion-SG2-Depositos/Inherent%20Hazards%20in%20Museum%20Collections.pdf. Accessed on: /07/2023.

Hough, W. 1887. The preservation of museum specimens from insects and the effects of dampness. In: United States National Museum. Report of the United States National Museum. pt. 2 of the Annual Report of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution for the years ending June 30, 1887. S. l., 549-558. Available at: https://repository.si.edu/handle/10088/29961. Accessed on: 21/07/2023.

Houlbert, C. 1903. Les insectes ennemis des livres: Leurs moeurs – moyens de lesDétruire. Alphonse Picard & fils, Paris.

Kathpalia, Y.P. 1973. Conservation et restauration des documents d’archives.UNESCO, Paris. Available at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000137650. Accessed on: 21/07/2023.

Odegaard, N.; Sadongei, A. (Eds.). 2005. Old poisons, new problems: a museum resource for managing contaminated cultural materials. Altamira Press, Walnut Creek.

Omstein, L. 2010. Poisonous Heritage: Pesticides in Museum Collections. Dissertação de Mestrado. Seton Hall University, South Orange. Available at: https://scholarship.shu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1255&context=theses. Accessed on: 21/07/2023.

Pinniger, D. 2001. Pest management in museums, archives and historic houses. Archetype Publications, London.

Plenderleith, H.J.; Werner, A.E.A. 1971. The conservation of antiquities and worksof art: treatment repair and restoration. Oxford University Press, London.

Pool, M. et al. 2005. Identifying the pesticides: pesticidenames, classification, and history of use. In: Odegaard, N; Sadongei, A. (Eds). Old poisons, new problems: a museum resource for managing contaminated cultural materials. Altamira Press, Walnut Creek, 5-31.

Sadongei, A. (2001). American Indian Concepts of Object Use. In: Proceedings of a Symposium Held at the National Conservation Training Center (NCTC), 2011, Shepherdstown, . Collection Forum, 17(1–2): 113–116. Available at: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/ncptt/upload/2002-23.pdf. Accessed on: 21 jul. 2023.

Tello, H. 2021. Les insecticides, témoins silencieux dans les collections du Musée d’ethnologie de Berlin: Les collections muséales du Musée d’ethnologie de Berlin entre preservation et délabrement. Trouble dans les collections, 2 : 1-14. Available at: https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03407895. Accessed on: 21/07/2023.

Waxman, M.F. 1998. Agrochemical and pesticide safety handbook. CRC Press, Boca Raton.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31

Funding data

How to Cite

DELGADO VIEIRA, Ana Carolina; VASQUEZ SALVADOR, Pablo Antonio. Past and present pest mitigation: insights from an international survey of practices. Revista do Museu de Arqueologia e Etnologia, São Paulo, Brasil, n. 43, p. 114–128, 2024. DOI: 10.11606/issn.2448-1750.revmae.2024.227497. Disponível em: https://revistas.usp.br/revmae/article/view/227497.. Acesso em: 3 jan. 2026.