Communication of nurses in surgical units in the orientation of patients: cultural influence

Authors

  • Márcia Maria Fontão Zago USP; Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto; Departamento de Enfermagem Geral e Especializada
  • Lisete Diniz Ribas Casagrande USP; Faculdade de Filosofia Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto; Departamento de Educação

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-11691997000400009

Keywords:

communication, orientation, surgical nursing, culture

Abstract

The aim of this study was to describe the influence of culture on the verbal interactions of the surgical nurse in the orientation of patients. On the basis of ethnography, authors describe the characteristics of the verbal interaction related to knowledge, beliefs, values, pattterns and work organization, in the cultural context.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Downloads

Published

1997-10-01

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 4 (1997)

Section

Original Articles

License

RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.
Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
 Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.

 

How to Cite

Zago, M. M. F., & Casagrande, L. D. R. (1997). Communication of nurses in surgical units in the orientation of patients: cultural influence. Revista Latino-Americana De Enfermagem, 5(4), 69-74. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-11691997000400009