Women’s reproductive autonomy during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.6910.4438Keywords:
Personal Autonomy , Reproductive Behavior , Womens's Health, Contraceptives Agents , Family Planning , COVID-19Abstract
Objective: to analyze the reproductive autonomy of women during the COVID-19 pandemic, considering sociodemographic, clinical, and reproductive factors. Method: a quantitative study with a cross-sectional design, conducted with 314 women aged 18 to 49 years old. Data were collected through an online questionnaire containing sociodemographic, clinical, and reproductive data, as well as the Reproductive Autonomy Scale. The Mann-Whitney and Student’s t tests were used to compare variables. Results: significant differences were found between the average scores of “decision-making” and marital status (p = <0.001); and “absence of coercion” and “communication” with age group (p = 0.03 e <0.001), residence (p = <0.001 and <0.01), schooling level (p = 0.02 e 0.02), pregnancy (p = <0.001 e 0.04) and contraception (p = 0.02 e <0.001). Conclusion: not having a sexual partner positively influenced autonomy in reproductive decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic. Women of younger age, living in the capital, with higher education levels, who had never been pregnant, and who used contraceptives during the pandemic showed greater autonomy in the absence of coercion and communication. It was possible to identify the groups that require greater attention and interventions to support their sexual health and reproductive choices.
Downloads
References
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.