Health literacy and quality of life of riverine populations in primary health care
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.7402.4441Keywords:
Health Literacy , Quality of Life, Socioeconomic Factors, Rural Nursing , Primary Health CareAbstract
Objective: to analyze functional health literacy and health-related quality of life in riverine populations using primary care services, according to sociodemographic variables. Method: an analytical, cross-sectional study with 312 users of the riverine family health strategy. Data were collected using a health literacy test, the 12-item Health Survey, and a socioeconomic questionnaire adapted by the researchers. Spearman correlation, Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests, as well as multiple logistic regression were performed, considering p≤0.05. Results: 65.7% presented inadequate functional health literacy, with higher risk for men (p<0.001), aged 40-49 (p=0.010) and 50-59 years (p=0.031), incomplete (p<0.001) and complete (p=0.024) elementary education, and residing far from health services (p<0.001). Quality of life showed no association with health literacy. However, lower quality of life was related to female gender (p=0.049), incomplete elementary education (p=0.016), use of mobile phones with internet and radio (p=0.013), advanced age (p<0.001), increased number of children (p=0.002), and lower age at the start of work activities (p<0.001). Conclusion: functional health literacy of riverine populations is inadequate and not associated with quality of life. However, both are influenced by the sociodemographic profile.
Downloads
References
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.
