Construction and validation of a video on the insertion of gastric and enteral tubes in children
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.7226.4507Keywords:
Enteral Nutrition; Child Health; Nursing; Nursing Education; Nursing Methodology Research; Instructional Film and VideoAbstract
Objective: to construct and validate an educational video on the procedure for inserting gastric and enteral tubes in children. Method: a methodological study in three phases: a) pre-production of the video; b) production; and c) post-production. First, a script was created based on scientific literature. The video was recorded in the Simulation Laboratory and edited using Movavi® software. The script and video were evaluated by 23 and 12 experts, respectively, via Google Forms®. The Health Education Content Validation, Video Validation, and Content Validity Index instruments were used, with a cut-off point ≥ 0.80. Results: the experts covered three regions of the country. The video contains scenes recorded with a pediatric simulation mannequin, images of materials used in the procedure, and screens with theoretical content. The video script obtained an overall content validation index of 0.83 and the video 0.94, both in one round. The final video lasts 10 minutes and 10 seconds. Conclusion: the script and video were validated. It is freely available on YouTube® and can be used by nurses/nursing students as a tool for study and professional assistance.
Downloads
References
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.
