Development of safety protocols for managing thirst in post-extubated and tracheostomized patients
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.7376.4498Keywords:
Thirst; Airway Extubation; Tracheostomy; Clinical Protocols; Practice Guideline; Intensive Care UnitsAbstract
Objective: to develop two distinct protocols, based on evidence, with safety criteria for post-extubated and tracheostomized patients in order to support the administration of thirst relief methods. Method: methodological study divided into two phases: definition of the scope and development of the protocols. Safety criteria were identified and submitted to the evaluation of reliability of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADEpro) system. The criteria were incorporated into flowcharts with their respective operational manuals. The Experts formulated recommendations and the Content Validity Index was calculated. Results: two protocols and its respective manuals were developed to assess the safety of the administration of thirst relief methods: one for post-extubated patients and the other for tracheostomized patients. Safety criteria listed: level of consciousness, signs of respiratory failure, nausea and/or vomiting, swallowing ability, coughing/airway protection, voice changes and adequate functioning of the tracheostomy tube. The Experts’ recommendations were obtained with a Content Validity Index of 87%. Conclusion: the clinical protocols, with six safety criteria each, based on evidence for the management of thirst in post-extubated and tracheostomized patients are innovative, allow safety assessment for thirst management and shows content validity.
Downloads
References
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.