Construction and validation of an information portal on combined HIV prevention
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.7221.4510Keywords:
Validation Study; HIV; Educational Technology; Disease Prevention; Access to Information; NursingAbstract
Objective: to build and validate an information portal on the combined prevention of human immunodeficiency virus infection. Method: a four-stage methodological study: definition, architecture, design, and implementation. The validation process was carried out by 24 nurses and 23 professionals specializing in Information Technology. A Likert-type questionnaire described the agreement between nurses/experts and IT professionals concerning the different attributes. The Content Validity Index was considered to have a cut-off point equal to or greater than 0.80. Results: the agreement rates were satisfactory, totaling 0.94 overall among nurses and 0.96 among IT professionals. The validity indicators showed satisfactory agreement in the attributes of general impression (0.96), objectives (0.90), adequacy of content (0.98) and language (1.00), relevance (0.96), high potential for attractiveness (0.91), and for innovation (0.90). In addition, the proposed technology has resources that guarantee easy navigation (0.96), as well as the quality of the interface (0.96), aesthetics, and audiovisuals (0.99). Conclusion: it can be concluded that PREVI@IDST is an innovative educational resource because it brings together valid evidence for information and guidance on combined HIV prevention.
Downloads
References
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.