Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Person-centered Practice Inventory-Staff for Brazilian culture
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.7803.4666Keywords:
Translating Process; Transcultural Studies; Validation Studies; Patient-Centered Care; Psychometrics; Reproducibility of ResultsAbstract
Objective: to translate, cross-culturally adapt and validate the Person-centered Practice Inventory-Staff into Brazilian Portuguese. Method: the methodological study followed the stages of translation, synthesis, back-translation, expert evaluation and pre-testing. Content validity was assessed using the Content Validity Index and the Content Validity Ratio. Convergent and discriminant construct validity was verified using confirmatory factor analysis. Internal consistency was checked by Cronbach’s alpha, Composite Reliability and McDonald’s Omega. Results: 15 professionals took part in the content validation and 307 in the evaluation of the construct and reliability. Content validity obtained values above 0.87 for the Content Validity Index and 0.73 for the Content Validity Ratio. The confirmatory factor analysis distributed the 59 items in the 17 original domains, with average variance extracted greater than 0.49 and factor loadings greater than 0.61. Internal consistency showed Cronbach’s alpha between 0.56 and 0.85; composite reliability between 0.75 and 0.89; and McDonald’s Omega between 0.61 and 0.88. Conclusion: the Brazilian version of the Person-centered Practice Inventory-Staff demonstrated satisfactory validity and reliability to assess the perception of person-centered care practice among nursing professionals in the hospital context.
Downloads
References
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.
