Take Care: development and evaluation of a serious game about violence against children and adolescents
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.7939.4738Keywords:
Educational Technology; Violence; Child; Adolescent; Continuing Education; Play and PlaythingsAbstract
Objective: to develop a serious game for nurses and physicians in Primary Health Care based on clinical cases that address types of violence against children and adolescents, and evaluate the serious game based on player satisfaction. Method: applied research of technological nature. Four stages were carried out: development of fictitious clinical cases as a basis for the serious game; evaluation of clinical cases by eight experts intentionally selected for participating in the Protection Network; development of the serious game by an interdisciplinary team; and evaluation of satisfaction with playing the game, using the e-GameFlow scale, with the participation of 33 nurses and 15 physicians. Results: seventeen clinical cases were developed, representing different types of violence. “Take Care” was developed as a simulation using Unity® software, set in a virtual doctor’s office. The game’s evaluation achieved a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.970. The areas of greatest satisfaction were: improvement in knowledge, concentration, and clarity of objectives. All participants said they would play again, 91% felt safe, 89% would not give up, and 70% finished without reporting the violence. Conclusion: “Take Care” was evaluated positively. It is suggested that it be used for continuing education, as an aid in identifying and reporting situations of violence.
Downloads
References
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.