Family health coverage and care reorganization during the COVID-19 pandemic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.7726.4790Keywords:
COVID-19; Pandemics; Primary Health Care; Public Health Surveillance; Health Management; National Health StrategiesAbstract
Objective: to evaluate the reorganization of Primary Health Care services for individuals with suspected and/or confirmed COVID-19 during the critical phase of the pandemic, considering family health team coverage. Method: analytical cross-sectional study conducted with 1,474 managers of Primary Health Care services. Data were collected using Google Forms and analyzed by prevalence ratios, employing a Poisson regression model with random effects. Results: municipalities with coverage below 25% showed a 10% higher prevalence of patient distancing, a 33% higher prevalence of attending patients with suspected/confirmed COVID-19 in a separate sector, a 60% higher prevalence of using Telehealth for monitoring mild cases, and a 7% higher prevalence of providing guidance on home isolation, compared to municipalities with coverage between 25% and 49.99%. Conclusion: the reorganization of Primary Health Care occurred differently among Family Health Strategy, with municipalities with lower coverage more frequently implementing prevention and monitoring measures. This finding underscores the need to establish and standardize protocols to guide the reorganization of health services in public health emergencies.
Downloads
References
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.