Clinical and epidemiological profile of pediatric patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: experience at a referral center
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.7999.4781Keywords:
Nursing; Pediatrics; Medical Records; Advanced Practice Nursing; Critical Care; Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.Abstract
Objective: to analyze the clinical-epidemiological profile of pediatric patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support at a referral center. Method: this was a cross-sectional, retrospective study based on the analysis of 108 electronic and physical medical records of pediatric patients from a public hospital. Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected using an instrument developed for this study. For the analysis, absolute and percentage frequencies, measures of central tendency and dispersion, Shapiro-Wilk normality test, Pearson’s chi-square test, logistic regression model with Stepwise input, multiple linear regression analysis, and Durbin-Watson test were used. Results: of the documents analyzed, 55.5% belonged to female patients. Regarding clinical outcomes, 76.1% were awaiting surgery before cannulation, 69.3% used vasoactive drugs, and 57.4% died. Central venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was the most used modality. The main indication for support was low cardiac output syndrome. Patients who developed mechanical complications during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation had a statistically higher risk of death (odds ratio of 2.8). Conclusion: mechanical complications were associated with an increased risk of mortality. The clinical-epidemiological profile highlights clinical severity, characterized by hemodynamic instability and surgical indication.
Downloads
References
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.