Competency matrix for healthcare professionals caring for people with chronic conditions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.7751.4760Keywords:
Competency-Based Education; Chronic Disease; Health Assessment; Nursing Education; Multidisciplinary Team; Public Health Professional Education.Abstract
Objective: to develop a competency matrix for healthcare professionals caring for people with chronic conditions. Method: ex-post-facto impact assessment research, based on David Kolb’s Experiential Learning Theory. The recommendations of SQUIRE 2.0 were adopted. Intervention projects from the Specialization Course in Care for People with Chronic Noncommunicable Diseases were analyzed. The analysis involved pre-analysis, exploration, coding, categorization, treatment of results, inference, and interpretation using AtlasTi® software. Results: 337 projects were analyzed, adapted to David Kolb’s theoretical framework on the experiential learning cycle, which comprised four domains: identification, analysis, problematization, and transformation. These results supported the development of a matrix of general and specific competencies. Conclusion: the proposed matrix contributed to the qualification of health professionals, prepares specialists to work with chronic conditions and reinforced the importance of critical thinking, analytical skills, and the application of knowledge, promoting a comprehensive understanding of complex issues in learning.
Downloads
References
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.